So, in short, if this bug has been reported upstream, I see a very low
benefit in keeping it opened in Debian.
Allright, then I guess the bug can be closed, as it has indeed been
reported upstream.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:43:49 +0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#417976: [INTL:ka] XKB Georgian keyboard layouts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hello, Wichert. It seems that your cistron.nl address is no longer
valid, so
I am forwarding this mail.
-- Mensaje reenviado --
Subject: Bug#82804: xbase-clients: [xmag] BadMatch during X_GetImage and then
coredump
Date: Lunes, 9 de Abril de 2007
From: Brice Goglin
This bug still exists in current xterm, as far as I can tell.
The following untested patch implements Richard Braakman's suggestion from 1997,
slightly more portably.
Open questions:
(1) Where should the logging be closed?
(2) Is any additional portability goo needed to send this upstream (e.g.
Thanks, I'll try to build it, and I'll report if it works...
2007/4/10, Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 00:20:53 +0200, emisca wrote:
I would like to backport using pbuilder the new 2.0rc intel driver
that it's present in the experimental branch of debian.
For what
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:04:38PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
|| About 6 years ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS
|| regarding xauth needing a way to identify/remove stake cookies. Did any
|| of you guys reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I
|| will
The title of this bug is misleading.
Package: libx11-6
Version: 2:1.0.3-6
Severity: important
It should read:
Package: libx11-6
Version: 2:1.0.3-7
Severity: important
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But if I want to do a complete Xorg 7.3 backport.. is there any
compilation order in addition to what we said?
2007/4/10, emisca [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks, I'll try to build it, and I'll report if it works...
2007/4/10, Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 00:20:53
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 11:10:47AM +0200, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
This bug still exists in current xterm, as far as I can tell.
I might have seen this before, but see that it's against xbase rather
than xterm - so perhaps I didn't see it...
The following untested patch implements Richard
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
package libglu1-xorg libglu1-xorg-dev x11-common xlibmesa-dri xlibmesa-gl
xlibmesa-gl-dev xlibmesa-glu xlibs-data xlibs-static-dev xorg xorg-dev
xserver-xfree86 xserver-xorg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
package libglu1-xorg libglu1-xorg-dev x11-common xlibmesa-dri xlibmesa-gl
xlibmesa-gl-dev xlibmesa-glu xlibs-data xlibs-static-dev xorg xorg-dev
xserver-xfree86 xserver-xorg
debian/changelog |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 18985c391bdfbbeb7c8bb26b6870837081e1a0fb
Author: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Apr 10 14:27:41 2007 +0200
Albanian translation has been reported as a bug now
diff --git
debian/changelog |3 ++-
debian/po/sv.po | 10 --
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 485c48d26d17b0cbb22fc43acb7217111774cdea
Author: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue Apr 10 14:29:19 2007 +0200
Swedish translation update
diff
Whats the status about this Bug?
I have applyed this trivial patch successfully
to ALL versions of XFree86 and Xorg.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
Am 2006-10-05 13:58:36, schrieb Michelle
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 391376 wontfix
Bug#391376: xserver should be able to write multiple xsession-errors
Tags were: patch
Tags added: wontfix
kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
tags 391376 wontfix
kthxbye
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 17:49:07 +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Whats the status about this Bug?
I have applyed this trivial patch successfully
to ALL versions of XFree86 and Xorg.
/etc/X11/Xsession is a conffile, so modifying it to suit your needs
locally is
.gitignore | 20
COPYING | 25
ChangeLog| 334 +
Makefile.am | 12
Makefile.in | 36
aclocal.m4 | 498 ++
config.guess | 667
debian/changelog |6 ++
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs-autoreconf.mk |2 +-
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.mk| 23 ++-
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.sh|2 +-
4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit
Tag 'libfontenc-1_1.0.4-2' created by Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
2007-04-10 16:20 +
Tagging upload of libfontenc 1:1.0.4-2 to unstable.
Changes since libfontenc-1_1.0.4-1:
Branden Robinson (3):
Set svn:keywords property to Id (keyword already present).
Note probable
libfontenc_1.0.4-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libfontenc_1.0.4-2.dsc
libfontenc_1.0.4-2.diff.gz
libfontenc1_1.0.4-2_i386.deb
libfontenc1-dbg_1.0.4-2_i386.deb
libfontenc-dev_1.0.4-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
Accepted:
libfontenc-dev_1.0.4-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/libf/libfontenc/libfontenc-dev_1.0.4-2_i386.deb
libfontenc1-dbg_1.0.4-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/libf/libfontenc/libfontenc1-dbg_1.0.4-2_i386.deb
libfontenc1_1.0.4-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/libf/libfontenc/libfontenc1_1.0.4-2_i386.deb
.gitignore | 11
ChangeLog| 531 -
Makefile.am | 18
Makefile.in | 77
XF86keysym.h |9
Xfuncproto.h | 109 -
Xfuncproto.h.in |9
Tag 'x11proto-core-7.0.10-2' created by Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
2007-04-10 16:36 +
Tagging upload of x11proto-core 7.0.10-2 to unstable.
Changes since x11proto-core-7.0.10-1:
Branden Robinson (3):
Set svn:keywords property to Id (keyword already present).
Note
x11proto-core_7.0.10-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
x11proto-core_7.0.10-2.dsc
x11proto-core_7.0.10-2.diff.gz
x11proto-core-dev_7.0.10-2_all.deb
x-dev_7.0.10-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
x-dev_7.0.10-2_all.deb
to pool/main/x/x11proto-core/x-dev_7.0.10-2_all.deb
x11proto-core-dev_7.0.10-2_all.deb
to pool/main/x/x11proto-core/x11proto-core-dev_7.0.10-2_all.deb
x11proto-core_7.0.10-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/x11proto-core/x11proto-core_7.0.10-2.diff.gz
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
x-dev_7.0.10-2_all.deb: package says section is x11, override says libdevel.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the package
Tag 'libice-1_1.0.3-2' created by Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
2007-04-10 17:24 +
Tagging upload of libice 1:1.0.3-2 to unstable.
Changes since libice-1_1.0.3-1:
Branden Robinson (3):
Set svn:keywords property to Id (keyword already present).
Note probable out-of-dateness
.gitignore | 20
ChangeLog| 345 +
Makefile.am |8
Makefile.in | 30
aclocal.m4 | 76
autogen.sh | 12
config.guess | 667 +--
libice_1.0.3-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libice_1.0.3-2.dsc
libice_1.0.3-2.diff.gz
libice6_1.0.3-2_i386.deb
libice6-dbg_1.0.3-2_i386.deb
libice-dev_1.0.3-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
libice-dev_1.0.3-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/libi/libice/libice-dev_1.0.3-2_i386.deb
libice6-dbg_1.0.3-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/libi/libice/libice6-dbg_1.0.3-2_i386.deb
libice6_1.0.3-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/libi/libice/libice6_1.0.3-2_i386.deb
libice_1.0.3-2.diff.gz
to
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libice-dev_1.0.3-2_i386.deb: package says section is x11, override says
libdevel.
libice6-dbg_1.0.3-2_i386.deb: package says section is x11, override says
libdevel.
Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
About 4 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xcalc
requiring to change app-defaults for keyboard under sawfish. Did you
reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close
this bug in the next weeks.
I do not use
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:56:11 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#187462: xbase-clients: [xcalc] need to change app-defaults
for keyboard to work under Sawfish window manager
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you
Vincent Zweije wrote:
A quick look at /usr/bin/startx suggests that the problem is still there:
an existing cookie for a display will be reused even if it is stale.
Ok, thanks. I'd be even better if you could provide a patch to do so
(and have it integrated upstream) :)
Note for the BTS:
FYI: The status of the xterm source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 222-1etch2
Current version: 225-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package libx11
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #418016
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10536
# * remote status changed: (?) - RESOLVED
#
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-input-keyboard
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #418298
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9964
# * remote status
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xbase-clients
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #46892
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10575
# * remote status changed: (?) - NEW
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg-server
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #407502
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7205
# * remote status changed: NEEDINFO -
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-intel
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #417860
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10466
# * remote status changed:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package libxfont
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #370149
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6918
# * remote status changed: NEW - CLOSED
# *
This is a list of what I've backported and its compilation order:
xcb-proto
libpthread-stubs0-dev
libxcb
xtrans
x11proto-core
x11proto-input
x11proto-randr
x11proto-damage
x11proto-gl
libxrandr
xbase-clients
libdrm
mesa
xorg-server
The packages I've updated are:
libdrm2 libgl1-mesa-dev
Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 01 April 2007 14:39, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
A very high default resolution: 1920×1200
I think this is the theoretical maximum the CRT monitor (IIyama
HM903D/DT) and VGA card, but in practise it was not OK.
I think it is better to use a maximum default
I still have to test well xrandr 1.2 and gnome. For now I tested only
KDE 3.5.6, and I noticed crashes, strange window movements, mad
panels, when I activated a second screen on the fly.
I've seen the soc ideas pages for both gnome and xorg, there is a lot
of work to do.
I can confirm
emisca wrote:
xrandr 1.2 is really a dream that become true... but perhaps there is
no application support by gnome and kde. The geometry of X changes but
the window manager doesn't read the changes or it's not notified. Do
you know if there are workarounds for this?
I have been running Gnome
Hi,
About 2 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xgamma
not reporting the correct gamma if it hasn't been set with xgamma. Did
you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will
close this bug in the next weeks.
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
About 2 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding ssh
xclock often failing. I can't reproduce here. Did you reproduce this
problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the
next weeks.
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xrandr
returning crazy Hz values. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With
Xorg/Etch? If so, could you try updating to the latest Xorg packages
currently in experimental?
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
(Please don't CC me on this BR, I'm not the submitter and I get them
through the list anyway.)
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 21:41, Brice Goglin wrote:
It's hard to find a default value that would make all machines/users
happy.
The (new?) option TargetRefresh in the Monitor section could be a
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding
serverauth files being left in your home directory. I can't reproduce
anymore.
Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch?
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding X11
forwarding not working. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With
Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks.
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
reassign 368052 xserver-xfree86
thank you
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding the X
server not starting on your Alpha machine. Did you reproduce this
problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the
next weeks.
Thanks,
Brice
--
To
Hi,
About a years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding startx
not working anymore after an upgrade to Xorg 7. Did you reproduce this
problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the
next weeks.
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 368052 xserver-xfree86
Bug#368052: Reporting a problem related to a server crash on Digital Alpha1200
Server
Bug reassigned from package `xbase-clients' to `xserver-xfree86'.
thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding oclock
not being updated after a time skip. Did you reproduce this problem
recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks.
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:59:05 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#382848: Upgrading xbase-clients : NVidia TwinView stops
working
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Hi,
About a years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding
xvidtune failing to start. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With
Xorg/Etch? If so, could you give more details how to reproduce the
problem? Does strace or gdb give anything interesting?
Thanks,
Brice
--
To
Hi,
About 6 months ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xbiff
not finding its bitmaps. I can't reproduce here. Did you reproduce this
problem recently?
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:07:22 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#399416: xbase-clients: xhost(1) refers to missing
Xsecurity(7)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Hi,
About 5 years ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS
regarding xclipboard problems when pasting 8-bit content into rxvt. Did
any of you guys reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not,
I will close this bug in the next weeks.
Thanks,
Brice
--
To
I haven't tried in a while, and don't have access to a linux machine at
the moment. The bug report has clear steps for reproducing it, so you
should easily be able to check if the bug still exists.
Wichert.
Previously David Martínez Moreno wrote:
Hello, Wichert. It seems that your
Hi,
About 3 years ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian BTS
regarding xmodmap problems. Does any of you guys still experience this
problem nowadays? With Xorg/Etch?
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:19:50 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found 321357 1:7.2.ds2-1
Bug#321357: xbase-clients: [xset] allowing autorepeat for a single key does not
work
Bug marked as found in version 1:7.2.ds2-1.
found 321434 1:7.2.ds2-1
Bug#321434: xedit: requires to press 'save' twice
Bug marked as found
Hi Michelle,
Could you try xbase-clients 1:7.2.ds2-1 currently sitting in
experimental? If the problem exists there too, we should forward this
bug on the upstream bugzilla (http://bugzilla.freedesktop.org, product
xorg, component App/other).
thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
found 402755 1:7.2.ds2-1
thank you
Hi Michelle,
This bug is apparently still present in xbase-clients 1:7.2.ds2-1
currently in experimental. Since, we are probably not going to add a
patch in our packaging to fix this, I suggest you forward your fix
upstream at bugzilla.freedesktop.org, product
Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:07:43 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#402755: *sampleTextUCS: is not valid UCS2 or better UTF-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
After looking at the corresponding beryl bug [1], it seems that this is
in fact a Firefox bug [2] [3].
[1] http://bugs.beryl-project.org/ticket/9
[2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368029
[3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215762
--
David Härdeman
.gitignore| 21
COPYING |2
ChangeLog | 268
Makefile.am |2
Makefile.in | 342
aclocal.m4| 3426 +
Tag 'xft-2.1.12-2' created by Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] at 2007-04-10
22:36 +
Tagging upload of xft 2.1.12-2 to unstable.
Changes since xft-2.1.12-1:
Branden Robinson (3):
Set svn:keywords property to Id (keyword already present).
Note probable out-of-dateness of
FYI: The status of the xorg source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:7.1.0-16
Current version: 1:7.1.0-18
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 392255 iceweasel
Bug#392255: compiz: Firefox autoscroll cursor leaves trailing marks
Bug reassigned from package `compiz' to `iceweasel'.
thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
reassign 392255 iceweasel
thank you
David Härdeman wrote:
After looking at the corresponding beryl bug [1], it seems that this
is in fact a Firefox bug [2] [3].
[1] http://bugs.beryl-project.org/ticket/9
[2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368029
[3]
xft_2.1.12-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xft_2.1.12-2.dsc
xft_2.1.12-2.diff.gz
libxft2_2.1.12-2_i386.deb
libxft2-dbg_2.1.12-2_i386.deb
libxft-dev_2.1.12-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
libxft-dev_2.1.12-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xft/libxft-dev_2.1.12-2_i386.deb
libxft2-dbg_2.1.12-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xft/libxft2-dbg_2.1.12-2_i386.deb
libxft2_2.1.12-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xft/libxft2_2.1.12-2_i386.deb
xft_2.1.12-2.diff.gz
to
Brice == Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brice Hi, About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS
Brice regarding oclock not being updated after a time skip. Did you
Brice reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will
Brice close this bug in the next weeks.
Go
Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:16:45 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#355691: oclock fails to update after time skip
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Brice Goglin escreveu:
Hi,
About 9 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding xsn
failing to reload twm. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With
Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks.
No; in fact, it's been some eight years since I last touched twm or
Version: 1:7.1.ds1-2
On Monday 09 April 2007 08:43, Brice Goglin wrote:
About 5 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding
apropos not working, and you said last year that it was still not
working, even if Denis couldn't reproduce the problem. Did you
reproduce? With Xorg/Etch?
79 matches
Mail list logo
