Bug#372278: marked as done (xserver-xorg-input-all: using clipboard with >8 bits characters doesn't work)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:11:50 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372278: xserver-xorg-input-all: using clipboard with >8 bits characters doesn't work has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#362637: marked as done (xorg-dev: Spelling mistake in package description)

Your message dated Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:30:20 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#362637: xorg-dev: Spelling mistake in package description has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#406061: "X: user not authorized to run the X server, aborting"

In my case, I had no Xwrapper.config at all; plenty of space. kitlann, what did you get? an empty Xwrapper.config? a file containing a wrong allowed_users= line?

Re: -ati driver (was: X.org plans for the lenny cycle)

Le dimanche 15 avril 2007 à 22:29 +0200, Brice Goglin a écrit : > Josip Rodin wrote: > > BTW, is there any chance that the -ati driver is going to include support > > for newer cards, the Radeon X series? It's sort of pointless for any newer > > machine, it won't even start X... > > > > Dave Ai

-ati driver (was: X.org plans for the lenny cycle)

Josip Rodin wrote: > BTW, is there any chance that the -ati driver is going to include support > for newer cards, the Radeon X series? It's sort of pointless for any newer > machine, it won't even start X... > Dave Airlie did some work on R500 last year, but he was waiting for ATI's approval be

Bug#418953: xserver-xorg: Xorg sporadically segfaults at system startup

Package: xserver-xorg Version: 1:7.1.0-18 Followup-For: Bug #418953 I also have the problem that the Xserver sometimes segfaults at startup and sometimes works. But there is no "rule" when it works again (like every second time as for the original reporter). Sometimes I even have to reboot. Maybe

Bug#295015: marked as done (xkbprint segfaults when )

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:11:48 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#295015: xkbprint segfaults when has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#406061: "X: user not authorized to run the X server, aborting"

Hi, Olaf, you got no /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config at all after upgrading x11-common? Or an empty one? Do you remember seeing any error in the postinst script output? kitlann, what did you get? an empty Xwrapper.config? a file containing a wrong allowed_users= line? Did you guys have space available

[bts-link] source package libxau

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package libxau # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #356545 # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5628 # * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED # *

[bts-link] source package xbase-clients

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xbase-clients # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #46892 # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10575 # * remote status changed: NEW -> ASSIGN

Bug#415541: [Debian bug#415541] xmms lockup when libX11 1.1.1 uses XCB

Hi XCB maintainers, Arthur Marsh reported on the Debian BTS 3 about weeks ago that libX11 1.1.1 was causing a lockup of its X server when running xmms. When trying with libX11 1.1 with XCB *disabled*, the problem goes away. Before possibly reassigning the bug to xmms, I would like to get upstream

Bug#133151: marked as done (xbase-clients: [xmag] SEGV in GetMinIntensity() when trying to magnify top edge of screen)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:40:24 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

xorg: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

debian/changelog |8 debian/local/dexconf | 14 +++--- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) New commits: commit ac3bb8a797b09ed7530f082149052671bb31c54b Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun Apr 15 13:43:16 2007 -0400 * Don't write the

libdrm: Changes to 'refs/tags/libdrm-2.3.0-3'

Tag 'libdrm-2.3.0-3' created by David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-04-15 17:39 + Tagging upload of libdrm-2.3.0-3 to experimental. Changes since libdrm-2.3.0-1: Aapo Tahkola (4): Sync from r300_reg.h from Mesa. Add support for texture cache flushes (R300_TX_CNTL) Add

libdrm: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

.gitignore | 99 autogen.sh | 12 debian/changelog | 10 debian/control |5 debian/docs|1 shared-core/drm_drawable.c | 330 + shared-core/drm_pciids.txt | 464 + shared-core/i915_dma.c | 846 +++ share

libdrm_2.3.0-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libdrm-dev_2.3.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libd/libdrm/libdrm-dev_2.3.0-3_i386.deb libdrm2-dbg_2.3.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libd/libdrm/libdrm2-dbg_2.3.0-3_i386.deb libdrm2_2.3.0-3_i386.deb to pool/main/libd/libdrm/libdrm2_2.3.0-3_i386.deb libdrm_2.3.0-3.diff.gz to pool/main/libd/

Processing of libdrm_2.3.0-3_i386.changes

libdrm_2.3.0-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libdrm_2.3.0-3.dsc libdrm_2.3.0-3.diff.gz libdrm-dev_2.3.0-3_i386.deb libdrm2_2.3.0-3_i386.deb libdrm2-dbg_2.3.0-3_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

libdrm: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

debian/changelog | 10 ++ debian/control |4 ++-- debian/patches/01_default_perms.diff | 13 + debian/patches/series|1 + debian/rules |5 +++-- 5 files changed, 29 insertions(+),

Processing of xorg-server_1.2.99.905-3_i386.changes

xorg-server_1.2.99.905-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xorg-server_1.2.99.905-3.dsc xorg-server_1.2.99.905-3.diff.gz xprint-common_1.2.99.905-3_all.deb xserver-xorg-core_1.2.99.905-3_i386.deb xserver-xorg-dev_1.2.99.905-3_i386.deb xdmx_1.2.99.905-

Processing of xorg_7.2-2_i386.changes

xorg_7.2-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xorg_7.2-2.dsc xorg_7.2-2.tar.gz xserver-xorg_7.2-2_all.deb xserver-xfree86_7.2-2_all.deb xorg_7.2-2_all.deb xorg-dev_7.2-2_all.deb xlibs-data_7.2-2_all.deb xlibs-static-dev_7.2-2_all.deb xlibmesa-dri

xorg_7.2-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: libglu1-xorg-dev_7.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/x/xorg/libglu1-xorg-dev_7.2-2_all.deb libglu1-xorg_7.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/x/xorg/libglu1-xorg_7.2-2_all.deb x-window-system-core_7.2-2_all.deb to pool/main/x/xorg/x-window-system-core_7.2-2_all.deb x-window-system_7.2-2_all.deb to p

xorg-server_1.2.99.905-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: xdmx-tools_1.2.99.905-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx-tools_1.2.99.905-3_i386.deb xdmx_1.2.99.905-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx_1.2.99.905-3_i386.deb xnest_1.2.99.905-3_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xnest_1.2.99.905-3_i386.deb xorg-server_1.2.99.905-3.

xorg override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): xlibmesa-dri_7.2-2_all.deb: package says section is libs, override says x11. xlibs-static-dev_7.2-2_all.deb: package says section is libs, override says libdevel. Either the package or th

Re: nouveau maintainership

On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 12:24:49AM +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote: > Hi, I saw the mail to debian-devel-release about XSF plans for lenny > asking for a maintainer for nouveau. I'm not yet a DD (I'm in NM), > however, I'm very interested in the nouveau project and have several > nvidia cards (princip

Bug#413492: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-all: amd64 can have xserver-xorg-video-vmware)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#413492: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#417149: marked as done (xorg: typo in xconf.org comments)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#408114: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#363910: marked as done (xorg: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD (missing vars.kfreebsd-i386 and vars.kfreebsd-amd64))

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#363910: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#314598: marked as done (xvfb: should depend on xfonts-base)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#314598: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.2.99.905-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#408114: marked as done (xorg: xorg.conf comment advises user to use full path to read manpage)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#408114: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#413454: marked as done (xorg: allow GNU/kFreeBSD console users to start X)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 16:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#413454: fixed in xorg 1:7.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

xorg: Changes to 'refs/tags/xorg-1_7.2-2'

Tag 'xorg-1_7.2-2' created by David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-04-15 15:48 + Tagging upload of xorg-1_7.2-2 to experimental. Changes since xorg-1_7.1.0-15: Colin Watson (1): debian/xserver-xorg.config.in: fix LP #68267. David Nusinow (6): * New upstream release *

xorg: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

debian/changelog |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit d6d092980fba60e8dd6693508806377a3c14 Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun Apr 15 11:48:06 2007 -0400 Prepare changelog for upload diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/ch

xorg-server: Changes to 'refs/tags/xorg-server-2_1.2.0-3-3'

Tag 'xorg-server-2_1.2.0-3-3' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-02-17 11:21 + Tagging upload of xorg-server 2:1.2.0-3 to experimental. Changes since xorg-server-2_1.1.1-18: Aaron Plattner (31): Export miDisableCompositeWrapper. Bump the video driver module ABI

xorg-server: Changes to 'refs/tags/xorg-server-2_1.2.99.905-3'

Tag 'xorg-server-2_1.2.99.905-3' created by David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-04-15 15:42 + Tagging upload of xorg-server-2_1.2.99.905-3 to experimental. Changes since xorg-server-2_1.2.99.905-2: David Nusinow (3): * Add 05_module_defaults.diff. This provides default modules lo

xorg-server: Changes to 'refs/tags/xorg-server-1.2.99.901'

Tag 'xorg-server-1.2.99.901' created by Keith Packard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-03-05 05:09 + Xorg Server Version 1.2.99.901 (1.3 RC1) Changes since xorg-server-1.2.0: Aaron Plattner (5): Add an RDTSC implementation to the x86 emulator. Return BadMatch if a client tries to clon

xorg-server: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

debian/changelog |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit 64b350545f7a4d3f02875b2bc3d0006ab460a7a6 Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun Apr 15 11:42:46 2007 -0400 Prepare changelog for upload diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/ch

xorg: Changes to 'debian-experimental'

debian/changelog|7 debian/control |5 debian/local/dexconf| 16 - debian/po/ar.po | 316 ++--- debian/po/bg.po | 328 ++ debian/po/bs.po

Bug#419372: marked as done (xorg)

Your message dated Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:08:27 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#419372: xorg has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Re: X.org plans for the lenny cycle

El Sábado, 14 de Abril de 2007, Noah Meyerhans escribió: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:25:31AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > > These are a real thorn in our sides. Another issue is the nvidia code > > obfuscation bug, which we can fix when we get nouveau in to the archive. > > I'd love to have a ded

Bug#295015: xkbprint segfaults when

Hi! About 2 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding a segfault of xkbprint. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks. Yes, that's correct. I had to look at the bug to refresh my memory. I attempted to reproduce t

Bug#419372: xorg

Package: xorg Version: 1:7.1.0-18 Severity: wishlist In the release notes for etch (section 2.3.3), it states that 'discover' is used by Xorg in order to detect what graphics controller is present in the system. Maybe discover should be made a dependency for an xorg installation? -- System Inf

Re: X.org plans for the lenny cycle

On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 12:24:24PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > BTW, is there any chance that the -ati driver is going to include support > for newer cards, the Radeon X series? It's sort of pointless for any newer > machine, it won't even start X... The problem is that the newer cards have dramati

Re: X.org plans for the lenny cycle

On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:25:31AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > > 1) active probing of video cards to allow a more dynamic setting and > > resetting of video modes used. This work is mostly complete already > > (available in experimental xserver-xorg-video-intel, soon to appear in > > unstable).

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ATI Radeon Xinerama problems.]

From: Michael Geddes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ATI Radeon Xinerama problems. Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:03:43 +1100 Hi David, I'm emailing you because you were in the changelog of the debian radeon xorg drivers... I'm hoping you might be able to help me with a problem I