I also have a workaround:
Make the Xnest main window 'sticky' (so it stays there on all desktops)
and the problem never happens.
Note that shading the window doesnt cause any problems provided it is sticky
This is a bit annoying but it works
--
Andrew McDonnell
B. Eng (CSE)
Member, IEEE
Mem
I can reproduce this as follows:
1. I'm running Debian Etch with PREEMPT enabled + KDM + fluxbox + Xorg
Info:
X Window System Version 7.1.1
Release Date: 12 May 2006
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 7.1.1
Build Operating System: UNKNOWN
Current Operating System: Linux angel4-Etch 2.6
Your message dated Tue, 22 May 2007 00:41:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349348: xserver-xorg: gamma should be set by configure
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 400632 +wontfix
Bug#400632: x11-common: should not ship a SUID root binary
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
tags 400632 +wontfix
thank you
We are not going to remove the SUID bit because of this. The actual
problem here is: why do you need x11-common installed on this system?
Probably because of complex dependencies between all X packages? The
upcoming xbase-clients split might make things better in th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 358433 +wontfix
Bug#358433: xserver-xorg: man 5x xorg.conf refers to README.DRI which is not
included in the package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
On Sunday 20 May 2007 21:32, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Michael Eyrich wrote:
> > modeline for 1600x1400 external lcd for mergedFB is no
> > longer accepted (virtual size seems to be restricted to
> > the size of the primary LCD), which worked well in
> > version 2:1.1.1-21
>
> Could you try with xserve
Hi,
On Mon, 21 May 2007 21:25:26 +0200, Brice Goglin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
It might be good to test Mesa 6.5.3-1 which has been uploaded to
experimental today. There are so many changes since 6.5.2 that it's
probably worth a try.
unfortunately no, the problem did not go away. But
Package: compiz-plugins
Version: 0.5.0.dfsg-1
Severity: normal
I get this message when I'm trying to start compiz;
/usr/bin/compiz.real: symbol lookup error:
/usr/lib/compiz/libdecoration.so: undefined symbol:
decor_apply_gravity
Upgrading libdecoration0 solves this, so I guess a versioned
Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Got a better one:
>
Great, thanks.
> Please decide whether this is a duplicate of #420860 and merge it if you
> think it to be the case.
>
It's hard to tell, it's somehow similar but still different.
The best would probably be to backport the fix[1] for #420860 in m
Package: xorg-docs
Severity: normal
Hi,
This package conflicts with xprt-xprintorg
The problem comes from file /usr/share/man/man7/Xprint.7.gz
See below
Regards
Stephane
Atteint ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable Release.gpg
Atteint ftp://ftp2.fr.debian.org unstable Release
Atteint ftp://ftp2.
Hi,
It might be good to test Mesa 6.5.3-1 which has been uploaded to
experimental today. There are so many changes since 6.5.2 that it's
probably worth a try.
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
It might be good to test Mesa 6.5.3-1 which has been uploaded to
experimental today. There are so many changes since 6.5.2 that it's
probably worth a try.
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ingo,
It might be good to test Mesa 6.5.3-1 which has been uploaded to
experimental today. The upstream bug that you reported has not been
touched yet, but there are so many changes since 6.5.2 that it's
probably worth a try.
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Hi Nikita,
It might be good to test Mesa 6.5.3-1 which has been uploaded to
experimental today. The upstream bug that you reported has not been
touched, but there are so many changes since 6.5.2 that it's probably
worth a try.
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Your message dated Mon, 21 May 2007 20:44:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391952: nexuiz: Nexuiz always segfaults
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Mon, 21 May 2007 20:40:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408702: glPointSize() doesn't always take effect with r300
driver
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 21 May 2007 20:38:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409212: amoeba: crashes on startup
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: libx11
Severity: normal
When cross-building (Emdebian), libx11 compiles src/util/makekeys.c
using the --host compiler then tries to execute it on the --build
system, causing a failure:
arm-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -g -O2 -DLIBXCURSOR=\"libXcursor.so.1\" -o makekeys
makekeys-makekeys.o -
Your message dated Mon, 21 May 2007 20:19:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379323: mesa-utils: glxinfo does not report library open
problems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 21 May 2007 20:21:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388860: mesa: [INTL:sv] Swedish translation
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Accepted:
libxpm-dev_3.5.6-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxpm/libxpm-dev_3.5.6-3_i386.deb
libxpm4-dbg_3.5.6-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxpm/libxpm4-dbg_3.5.6-3_i386.deb
libxpm4_3.5.6-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxpm/libxpm4_3.5.6-3_i386.deb
libxpm_3.5.6-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/libx/
libxpm_3.5.6-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libxpm_3.5.6-3.dsc
libxpm_3.5.6-3.diff.gz
libxpm4_3.5.6-3_i386.deb
libxpm4-dbg_3.5.6-3_i386.deb
libxpm-dev_3.5.6-3_i386.deb
xpmutils_3.5.6-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
debian/changelog |6 --
debian/rules |2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 6c13b5404423b87088304e2eff6af4f74895568d
Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon May 21 17:37:23 2007 +0200
Fix dh_shlibdeps invocation so xpmutils
Tag 'libxpm-1_3.5.6-3' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at
2007-05-21 15:51 +
Tagging upload of libxpm 1:3.5.6-3 to unstable.
Changes since libxpm-1_3.5.6-2:
Julien Cristau (2):
Put the binary packages in the correct sections.
Fix dh_shlibdeps invocation so xpmutils
Accepted:
xserver-xorg-video-voodoo_1.1.1-2.diff.gz
to
pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-voodoo/xserver-xorg-video-voodoo_1.1.1-2.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-video-voodoo_1.1.1-2.dsc
to pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-voodoo/xserver-xorg-video-voodoo_1.1.1-2.dsc
xserver-xorg-video-voodoo_1.1.1-2_i386.de
xserver-xorg-video-voodoo_1.1.1-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
xserver-xorg-video-voodoo_1.1.1-2.dsc
xserver-xorg-video-voodoo_1.1.1-2.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-video-voodoo_1.1.1-2_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Tag 'xserver-xorg-video-voodoo-1_1.1.1-2' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> at 2007-05-21 13:40 +
Tagging upload of xserver-xorg-video-voodoo 1:1.1.1-2 to unstable.
Changes since xserver-xorg-video-voodoo-1_1.1.1-1:
Alan Coopersmith (1):
Replace references to XFree86/XF86Co
debian/changelog | 16 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit bd1588021150660b4e239baa840892f51c58dde8
Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon May 21 15:22:32 2007 +0200
Prepare changelog for upload, and fix history.
On
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-nv
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #425279
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11006
# * remote status changed: (?)
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-intel
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #424941
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10645
# * remote status changed: (
I will check and keep you informed. thanks for the link.
> wri-ano wrote:
> > in source package, file src/xf86Fpit.c , line 91, in "#define
> > PROXIMITY_BIT 0x20
> > " ... replacing 0x20 with 0x40 fixed the problem.
> > Indeed, according to the comments in the file itself, it was
> > previously
Accepted:
libgl1-mesa-dev_6.5.3-1_all.deb
to pool/main/m/mesa/libgl1-mesa-dev_6.5.3-1_all.deb
libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg_6.5.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/mesa/libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg_6.5.3-1_i386.deb
libgl1-mesa-dri_6.5.3-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/mesa/libgl1-mesa-dri_6.5.3-1_i386.deb
libgl1-mesa-glx-db
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libgl1-mesa-dri_6.5.3-1_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and t
mesa_6.5.3-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mesa_6.5.3-1.dsc
mesa_6.5.3.orig.tar.gz
mesa_6.5.3-1.diff.gz
libgl1-mesa-dev_6.5.3-1_all.deb
mesa-common-dev_6.5.3-1_all.deb
mesa-swx11-source_6.5.3-1_all.deb
libgl1-mesa-swx11_6.5.3-1_i386.deb
libgl1
Tag 'mesa-6.5.3-1' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-05-21
11:09 +
Tagging upload of mesa 6.5.3-1 to experimental.
Changes since mesa-6.5.2-5:
Aapo Tahkola (6):
Fix invalid enums passed to MapBuffer
Fix invalid enums passed to MapBuffer
typo fix. this ca
debian/changelog| 12 +---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/radeon_lock.c |4 +++-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit e1b0715dd6326033b15b6dd2bb2fcbcfdb950df9
Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon May 21 11:35:28 2
Your message dated Mon, 21 May 2007 11:11:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422089: New upstream version available (0.4 stable and 0.5
devel)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 21 May 2007 08:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#411012: fixed in compiz 0.5.0.dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 21 May 2007 08:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408605: fixed in compiz 0.5.0.dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Mon, 21 May 2007 08:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#411012: fixed in compiz 0.5.0.dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Accepted:
compiz-core_0.5.0.dfsg-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/c/compiz/compiz-core_0.5.0.dfsg-1_i386.deb
compiz-dev_0.5.0.dfsg-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/c/compiz/compiz-dev_0.5.0.dfsg-1_i386.deb
compiz-gnome_0.5.0.dfsg-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/c/compiz/compiz-gnome_0.5.0.dfsg-1_i386.deb
compiz-gtk_0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> tags 370379 + fixed-upstream
Bug#370379: xbase-clients: Very noisy after upgrade to Xorg 7.0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing
compiz_0.5.0.dfsg-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
compiz_0.5.0.dfsg-1.dsc
compiz_0.5.0.dfsg.orig.tar.gz
compiz_0.5.0.dfsg-1.diff.gz
compiz_0.5.0.dfsg-1_all.deb
compiz-core_0.5.0.dfsg-1_i386.deb
compiz-dev_0.5.0.dfsg-1_i386.deb
compiz-gtk_0.5.0.d
Tag 'compiz-0.5.0.dfsg-1' created by Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at
2007-05-21 08:31 +
Tagging upload of compiz 0.5.0.dfsg-1 to unstable.
Changes since compiz-0.3.6-1:
Bellegarde Cedric (8):
Add option for disabling focus prevention.
Add translucent flag properly.
Ad
debian/changelog |6 +-
debian/rules |2 --
dev/null |binary
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 54bf8ba31a2684cc031e8f0f64bacd8935efbbec
Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat May 19 17:36:14 2007 +0200
Don't remove .
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 09:18 +0200, Alexandre Rossi wrote:
>
> > > (WW) intel(0): Disabling Xv because the overlay register buffer
> > > allocation failed.
> > >
> > > If I explicitely use VideoRam 32768 in xorg.conf, xorg does not start
> > > and fails with the following message :
> > > (II) intel
Hi,
> (WW) intel(0): Disabling Xv because the overlay register buffer
> allocation failed.
>
> If I explicitely use VideoRam 32768 in xorg.conf, xorg does not start
> and fails with the following message :
> (II) intel(0): Kernel reported 110080 total, 1 used
> (II) intel(0): I830CheckAvailableM
48 matches
Mail list logo
