Package: xorg
Version:
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n, patch
The updated Vietnamese translation for the program file: xorg
translated and submitted by:
Clytie Siddall (vi-VN, Vietnamese free-software translation team /
nhóm Việt hóa phần mềm tự do)
vi.po.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 06:39:53AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
reassign 426897 xorg
thanks
Quoting Zamorano ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: installation
Severity: important
The translation to spanish of the description makes that a user who
wants all the resolutions listed installed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 426897 xorg
Bug#426897: Bad spanish translation on display selection during installation
process
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `xorg'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
reassign 426897 xserver-xorg
thanks
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 07:55:17AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:51:57PM +0200, Zamorano wrote:
Package: installation
Severity: important
The translation to spanish of the description makes that a user who
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 426897 xserver-xorg
Bug#426897: Bad spanish translation on display selection during installation
process
Bug reassigned from package `xorg' to `xserver-xorg'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Hi,
a quick grep on old syslogs shows no unaligned traps in Xorg since 6.
Mar. 2007. I'm using testing.
Yours,
Andreas.
Am 31.05.2007 um 20:19 schrieb Brice Goglin:
Hi,
About 2 years ago, you reported (or replied to) a bug in the Debian
BTS
regarding Xorg causing unaligned traps on
El viernes, 1 de junio de 2007, Steve Langasek escribió:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 07:55:17AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:51:57PM +0200, Zamorano wrote:
Sorry, but I don't understand this report. What precise text are you
referring too? The
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
tags 425304 + fixed-upstream
Bug#425304: xkb-data: layout se broken, comment delimiter (//) missing on
line 212 in symbols/se
Tags were: pending confirmed
Tags added: fixed-upstream
On Thu, 31 May 2007 at 20:21:24 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
About 2 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding being
unable to change focus from galeon to firefox. Did you reproduce this
problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest xserver-xorg-core in
unstable? If not, I will
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6~custom
Severity: important
Hi !
I have updated the fglrx-driver package into unstable and it does work
with current xorg.
Could you remove the conflicts on fglrx-driver then ?
On a side remark, I feel it completly inapropriate to add such
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
notfound 427035 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6~custom
Bug#427035: xserver-xorg-core: please remove conflicts on fglrx-driver
Bug marked as not found in version 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6~custom.
found 4270352:1.3.0.0.dfsg-5
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
notfound 427035 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6~custom
forcemerge 424975 427035
kthxbye
On Fri, Jun 1, 2007 at 14:29:19 +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6~custom
There is no such version of this package in debian.
Severity: important
Hi !
I have
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
notfound 427035 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6~custom
Bug#427035: xserver-xorg-core: please remove conflicts on fglrx-driver
Bug marked as not found in version 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6~custom.
forcemerge 424975 427035
Bug#424975: please don't conflict with fglrx-driver
Le Friday 01 June 2007 14:53:29 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit :
package A does not work with package B seems to me like a good reason
for a conflict.
This has never been true in sid so I don't see the point.
Given the amount of users annoyed by this bug I think it's not needed to argue
Le Friday 01 June 2007 14:57:16 Romain Beauxis, vous avez écrit :
Le Friday 01 June 2007 14:53:29 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit :
package A does not work with package B seems to me like a good reason
for a conflict.
This has never been true in sid so I don't see the point.
Given the
Tag 'xorg-server-2_1.3.0.0.dfsg-6' created by Julien Cristau [EMAIL
PROTECTED] at 2007-06-01 13:50 +
Tagging upload of xorg-server 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6 to unstable.
Changes since xorg-server-2_1.3.0.0.dfsg-5:
Julien Cristau (1):
fglrx has fixed their version check.
---
debian/changelog
debian/changelog |6 ++
debian/control |2 +-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 94b8195fc2870690a8b0e3ed8a750b5e92f96a41
Author: Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jun 1 15:06:19 2007 +0200
fglrx has fixed their version check.
xorg-server_1.3.0.0.dfsg-6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
xorg-server_1.3.0.0.dfsg-6.dsc
xorg-server_1.3.0.0.dfsg-6.diff.gz
xprint-common_1.3.0.0.dfsg-6_all.deb
xserver-xorg-core_1.3.0.0.dfsg-6_i386.deb
xserver-xorg-dev_1.3.0.0.dfsg-6_i386.deb
Accepted:
xdmx-tools_1.3.0.0.dfsg-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx-tools_1.3.0.0.dfsg-6_i386.deb
xdmx_1.3.0.0.dfsg-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xdmx_1.3.0.0.dfsg-6_i386.deb
xnest_1.3.0.0.dfsg-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xorg-server/xnest_1.3.0.0.dfsg-6_i386.deb
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 14:02:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#424975: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 14:02:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#424975: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 14:02:10 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#424975: fixed in xorg-server 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Thank you for you interest.
The bug does not appear at this time.
debian xserver-core 2:1.1.1-21
On Wed, 30 May 2007 10:03:54 -0400
amc.bst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Brice Goglin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 4:49 PM
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg-server
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #393190
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11073
# * remote status changed: (?) - NEW
Your message dated Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:08:32 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#410768: gdm fails causes restart with no warning
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hmm, as I've just noted in the bug log, this is not a question of the
fidelity of the translation; it's a problem with the resulting behavior
which is reported to be different from what's documented in both the English
and Spanish debconf templates.
H, OK. So the point becomes: is the
tags 426798 pending
thanks
Quoting Clytie Siddall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: xorg
Version:
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n, patch
The updated Vietnamese translation for the program file: xorg
translated and submitted by:
Committed.
--
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
debian/changelog|4
debian/po/ar.po | 318 +---
debian/po/bg.po | 330 ++
debian/po/bs.po | 328 ++---
debian/po/ca.po | 343
On Fri, Jun 1, 2007 at 19:14:14 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Hmm, as I've just noted in the bug log, this is not a question of the
fidelity of the translation; it's a problem with the resulting behavior
which is reported to be different from what's documented in both the English
and
As an update to the prior report... In the current experimental
version of mesa-dri (6.5.3-1), the driver shows the same symptons as
my home-compiled version. That is, when using the r200 DRI driver,
the test program shows a solid color (see attached screenshot) --
rather than the desirable 50%
debian/changelog |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 0ad67361199f1d16e75ad56d2c5e419901a42227
Author: Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri Jun 1 22:45:03 2007 +0200
Prepare changelog for upload.
diff --git a/debian/changelog
Tag 'xserver-xorg-input-aiptek-1_1.0.1-3' created by Julien Cristau [EMAIL
PROTECTED] at 2007-06-01 20:46 +
Tagging upload of xserver-xorg-input-aiptek 1:1.0.1-3 to unstable.
Changes since 1_1.0.1-2:
Adam Jackson (8):
Bug #3626: _X_EXPORT tags for video and input drivers.
xserver-xorg-input-aiptek_1.0.1-3_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
xserver-xorg-input-aiptek_1.0.1-3.dsc
xserver-xorg-input-aiptek_1.0.1-3.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-input-aiptek_1.0.1-3_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
Accepted:
xserver-xorg-input-aiptek_1.0.1-3.diff.gz
to
pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-input-aiptek/xserver-xorg-input-aiptek_1.0.1-3.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-input-aiptek_1.0.1-3.dsc
to pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-input-aiptek/xserver-xorg-input-aiptek_1.0.1-3.dsc
About a years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding XKB
option grp:alt_shiht_toggle not cycling between layouts. Did you
reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest
xserver-xorg-core in unstable? Does the problem still matter, even after
reading Denis' reply[1] to
Your message dated Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:02:49 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
on Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 07:55:27AM +0200, Brice Goglin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
retitle 426970 xrandr segfaults
thank you
Karsten M. Self wrote:
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 1:7.1.ds1-2
Severity: normal
xrandr segfaults when invoked.
Does it happen with
Your message dated Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:31:06 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#426970: xbase-clients: xrandr segfaults reading
/lib/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:27:51 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#350253: xserver-xorg: XKB option grp:alt_shift_toggle does
not cycle between layouts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
FYI: The status of the libdrm source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.0.2-0.1
Current version: 2.3.0-4
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
FYI: The status of the libsm source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.0.2-2
Current version: 2:1.0.3-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
FYI: The status of the libxcursor source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.1.7-4
Current version: 1:1.1.8-2
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
FYI: The status of the libxfont source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.2.2-2
Current version: 1:1.2.8-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
FYI: The status of the libxaw source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.0.2-4
Current version: 1:1.0.3-3
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
FYI: The status of the libxext source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.0.1-2
Current version: 1:1.0.3-2
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
FYI: The status of the libxcomposite source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:0.3-3
Current version: 1:0.3.2-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
FYI: The status of the libxfixes source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:4.0.1-5
Current version: 1:4.0.3-2
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
FYI: The status of the libxres source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2:1.0.1-2
Current version: 2:1.0.3-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
FYI: The status of the libxrender source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:0.9.1-3
Current version: 1:0.9.2-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
FYI: The status of the libxkbfile source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.0.3-2
Current version: 1:1.0.4-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
FYI: The status of the libxss source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.1.0-1
Current version: 1:1.1.2-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
FYI: The status of the libxrandr source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2:1.1.0.2-5
Current version: 2:1.2.1-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
FYI: The status of the xbase-clients source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:7.1.ds1-2
Current version: 1:7.2.ds2-2
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
FYI: The status of the xfs source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.0.1-5
Current version: 1:1.0.4-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
FYI: The status of the xserver-xorg-video-nv source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.2.0-3
Current version: 1:2.0.2-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for
FYI: The status of the xutils-dev source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:7.1.ds-6
Current version: 1:7.2.ds2-1
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
Package: xserver-xephyr
Version: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-5
Severity: normal
Xephyr -xinerama and Xephyr -extension XINERAMA don't actually turn off
Xinerama, according to xdpyinfo.
- Josh Triplett
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'),
tags 402165 + patch
tags 414535 + patch
thanks
I worked with jcristau and christoph4 via IRC on #debian-x, and we managed to
track down the problem with broken locking in Sun Java 1.5 and 1.6. It only
occurs if Java finds the Xinerama extension, at which point it does something
broken with
Package: xserver-xephyr
Version: 2:1.1.1-21
Severity: normal
This package is missing a man page for the Xephyr command
(/usr/bin/Xephyr).
Per Debian Policy 12.1:
Each program, utility, and function should have an associated manual
page included in the same package. It is suggested
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Brice Goglin wrote:
It looks like another PCI domain related problem. The PCI code is being
reworked upstream, but it is not clear when it will be ready.
Sigh :( I'd be happy to test any WIP - is there an experimental version
of newer upstream ?
Did you ever get Xorg to
60 matches
Mail list logo
