Hi, Michel,
I think I may have a lead on the blending problems with the r200 DRI
driver. The problem seems to go away if I apply the attached patch to
Mesa-6.5.3. This seems to work when tested under gcc 4.1.3 or 4.2
(20070528).
Open questions include:
- Is the "0" usage in "asm" statements
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:05:04 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389727: xserver-xorg: Server died with backtrace
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 01:14:55PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2007 at 11:54:02 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> > * Josh Triplett:
> >
> > > Barring that, how about shipping an executable script
> > > /usr/share/doc/sun-java{5,6}-bin/unbreak-my-java ?
> >
> > The license does
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 at 10:51:32 +0200, Jan Gorski wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2007 at 20:21:24 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > About 2 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding being
> > unable to change focus from galeon to firefox. Did you reproduce this
> > problem recently? With Xorg
Hi,
> About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding a crash
> of the X server when using xawtv. Did you reproduce this problem
> recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest xserver-xorg-core in unstable? If
> not, I will close this bug in the next weeks.
reproduced with 2:1.1.1-21, u
Brice Goglin schrieb am Sun 03. Jun, 21:39 (+0200):
> About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding a crash
> of the X server (which you provided a backtrace for). It looks like a
> GLX problem (builtin GLcore/mesa module in the server). However, I
> didn't find a similar backtra
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:44:15PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About 6 months ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding DPMS
> not kicking automatically as expected. Did you reproduce this problem
> recently? With latest xserver-xorg-core in unstable? Xserver 1.3 has
> been ther
> we forward the bug report it on
> bugzilla.freedesktop.org and wait for upstream developer to fix it.
It would be brilliant that the Debian community were able to do better than the
upstream :-D
>
> If your bug is the same than one above, then upstream is already
> notified of your problem a
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:21:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#39: xserver-xorg: monitor comes out of power-save mode
without user action
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
I am now running Etch and have not seen this problem recently.
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 22:41 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Several months ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding
> powersave mode ending without any user action. Did you reproduce this
> problem recently? With Xorg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 427422 important
Bug#427422: xserver-xorg: does not return to console after end of xsession
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
severity 427422 important
kthxbye
On Sun, Jun 3, 2007 at 22:39:12 +0200, Michael Hierweck wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.1.0-16
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
No, this doesn't make the X server unusable for everyone. Please don't
file bugs with exc
Hi,
Several months ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding Xorg
not working anymore on your cg14 board. The bug was expected to be fixed
soon. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With latest
xserver-xorg-core and drivers?
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
About 6 months ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding DPMS
not kicking automatically as expected. Did you reproduce this problem
recently? With latest xserver-xorg-core in unstable? Xserver 1.3 has
been there for a while, and the bug was expected to be fixed in Xserver 1.2.
Thank
Hi,
Several months ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding
powersave mode ending without any user action. Did you reproduce this
problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest xserver-xorg-core and
drivers? If so, could you send the output of
/usr/share/bug/xserver-xorg-core/script
Hi,
About 6 months ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding X
crashing on a Savage board when a remote session opens. Did you
reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest
xserver-xorg-core and drivers?
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:26:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382975: xorg: Barebone X (for example kdm or xinit) won't
let me change virtual console
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Hi Giacomo,
I guess this problem with the RGB database being replaced by a static
table still occurs wth latest xserver-xorg-core 1.3, right? For the
record, it looks like we could revert to the old behavior by defining
USE_RGB_BUILTIN to 0 during the build (see os/oscolor.c). However, I am
not su
On Sunday 03 June 2007, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding the
> upgrade to Xorg 7.0 causing switching to VT console to not work anymore.
> Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest
> xserver-xorg-core and driver
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 09:25:51PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest
Yes, this bug is constantly reproducing, but I am using sid, not
etch.
> xserver-xorg-core and drivers? If so, could you get a backtrace from the
> bottom the Xorg.0.l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> tags 183029 + wontfix
Bug#183029: xfree86: put X server, XIM, and font server Unix domain sockets in
/var/run/X11 instead of /tmp
Tags were: upstream patch
Tags added: wontfix
>
End
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:00:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381069: causes excessive CPU usage by Xorg
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Brice Goglin wrote:
> About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding an
> excessive CPU usage in Xorg. Did you reproduce this problem recently?
> With Xorg/Etch? With latest xserver-xorg-core in unstable? If not, I
> will close this bug in the next weeks.
Hi, thanks for the remin
Hi,
Several months ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding Xorg
not willing to change the Hz of your tdf board. Did you reproduce this
problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest xserver-xorg-core and drivers?
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 395558 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4696
Bug#395558: xserver-xorg-core: tulip crashes X with sigsegv on file->new
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4696.
> thank
forwarded 395558 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4696
thank you
Hi,
Several months ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding a
crash of the X server when running tulip. Did you reproduce this problem
recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest xserver-xorg-core in unstable? If
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding a crash
of the X server (which you provided a backtrace for). It looks like a
GLX problem (builtin GLcore/mesa module in the server). However, I
didn't find a similar backtrace on the upstream bugzilla, so it's hard
to know wheth
debian/changelog |6 ++
debian/watch |2 +-
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 15d73ffe58cfd260937996409f8bab721ff8241e
Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun Jun 3 21:36:37 2007 +0200
Update watch file (s/i810/intel/)
diff --
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding matlab
causing X to crash. I am sorry we did not reply to your submission
earlier. Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With
latest xserver-xorg-core in unstable?
If so, could you look at the bottom of Xorg.0
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding the
upgrade to Xorg 7.0 causing switching to VT console to not work anymore.
Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest
xserver-xorg-core and drivers? If not, I will close this bug in the next
weeks.
Th
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding X
crashing during xlock after a switching to VT console and back to X. Did
you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest
xserver-xorg-core and drivers? If so, could you get a backtrace from the
bottom the Xorg.
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding an
excessive CPU usage in Xorg. Did you reproduce this problem recently?
With Xorg/Etch? With latest xserver-xorg-core in unstable? If not, I
will close this bug in the next weeks.
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
D G wrote:
> Thank you.
>
>
>> This error points me to the following bugs:
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9930
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10912
>> You might want to look at them.
>>
>
> Then, what do you mean? Do you mean that it is a bug on ano
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:34:07 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#362556: xserver-xorg-core: Need to document Xkb changes
for xorg.conf
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Thank you.
>
> This error points me to the following bugs:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9930
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10912
> You might want to look at them.
Then, what do you mean? Do you mean that it is a bug on another package, not on
xserver-
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding the X
server reporting some duplicated keycodes. Did you reproduce this
problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest xserver-xorg-core in
unstable? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks.
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUB
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding a crash
of the X server when using xawtv. Did you reproduce this problem
recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest xserver-xorg-core in unstable? If
not, I will close this bug in the next weeks.
Thanks,
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Accepted:
x11-utils_0.1.dsc
to pool/main/x/x11-utils/x11-utils_0.1.dsc
x11-utils_0.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/x11-utils/x11-utils_0.1.tar.gz
x11-utils_0.1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/x11-utils/x11-utils_0.1_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
x11-utils_0.1.dsc - optional x11
x11-utils_0.1
Accepted:
xauth_1.0.2-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xauth/xauth_1.0.2-1.diff.gz
xauth_1.0.2-1.dsc
to pool/main/x/xauth/xauth_1.0.2-1.dsc
xauth_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xauth/xauth_1.0.2-1_i386.deb
xauth_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/xauth/xauth_1.0.2.orig.tar.gz
Override entries for
Accepted:
x11-xfs-utils_0.1.dsc
to pool/main/x/x11-xfs-utils/x11-xfs-utils_0.1.dsc
x11-xfs-utils_0.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/x11-xfs-utils/x11-xfs-utils_0.1.tar.gz
x11-xfs-utils_0.1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/x11-xfs-utils/x11-xfs-utils_0.1_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
x11-xfs-ut
Accepted:
x11-xkb-utils_0.1.dsc
to pool/main/x/x11-xkb-utils/x11-xkb-utils_0.1.dsc
x11-xkb-utils_0.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/x11-xkb-utils/x11-xkb-utils_0.1.tar.gz
x11-xkb-utils_0.1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/x11-xkb-utils/x11-xkb-utils_0.1_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
x11-xkb-ut
Accepted:
x11-apps_0.1.dsc
to pool/main/x/x11-apps/x11-apps_0.1.dsc
x11-apps_0.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/x11-apps/x11-apps_0.1.tar.gz
x11-apps_0.1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/x11-apps/x11-apps_0.1_i386.deb
Override entries for your package:
x11-apps_0.1.dsc - optional x11
x11-apps_0.1_i386.deb -
Accepted:
x11-xserver-utils_0.1.dsc
to pool/main/x/x11-xserver-utils/x11-xserver-utils_0.1.dsc
x11-xserver-utils_0.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/x11-xserver-utils/x11-xserver-utils_0.1.tar.gz
x11-xserver-utils_0.1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/x11-xserver-utils/x11-xserver-utils_0.1_i386.deb
Override
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding a
random crash of the server, possibly related to the screensaver.
Did you reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest
xserver-xorg-core and drivers? If not, I will close this bug in the next
weeks.
Thanks,
Bric
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding a crash
of the X server possibly related to a GL screensaver. Did you reproduce
this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest xserver-xorg-core and
drivers? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks.
Thanks,
Brice
Hi,
About a years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding a
crash of the X server with an undefined symbol error regarding fonts
when looking at the font list in openoffice.org. Did you reproduce this
problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest xserver-xorg-core in
unstable? If not,
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding a crash
of the X server after keyboard selection with xkbsel{,-aw}. Did you
reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest
xserver-xorg-core in unstable? If not, I will close this bug in the next
weeks.
Thanks,
Bri
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:43:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363680,xserver-xorg-core: default nice value makes xorg
behave nasty.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding a
freeze of the X server after upgrading to Xorg 7.0. Did you reproduce
this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest xserver-xorg-core and
drivers? If not, I will close this bug in the next weeks.
Thanks,
Brice
--
To U
Hi,
About a year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding a crash
of the X server while running a dual-head ATI + nVidia config. Did you
reproduce this problem recently? With Xorg/Etch? With latest
xserver-xorg-core and drivers? With the free nv driver instead of the
binary nvidia one?
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jun 2007 18:45:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349544: xmodmap insists that the user specify mapping for
9 buttons for a mouse with only 5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> notfound 349544 1:7.2.ds2-1
Bug#349544: xmodmap insists that the user specify mapping for 9 buttons for a
mouse with only 5
Bug marked as not found in version 1:7.2.ds2-1.
>
End of
On Sun, Jun 3, 2007 at 17:29:49 +0100, Sheridan Hutchinson wrote:
> Given there probably aren't many compiz 0.2.2-1 users in lenny, I'd
> thought I'd report this.
>
> I'm using KDE 3.5.5 and compiz worked wonderfully before 02/05/07 where
> the libc6 upgrade and a slew of other packages came t
tags 427346 +unreproducible
thank you
hramrach wrote:
> I tried to swap my mouse buttons with xmodmap -e "pointer 3 2 1"
>
You meant "pointer = 3 2 1" (equal sign was missing), right?
> xmodmap warns that it changes only the first three buttons, and the
> mouse is not remapped. However, xmo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 427346 +unreproducible
Bug#427346: xbase-clients: xmodmap fails to remap mouse buttons
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Package: compiz
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: important
Hi,
Given there probably aren't many compiz 0.2.2-1 users in lenny, I'd
thought I'd report this.
I'm using KDE 3.5.5 and compiz worked wonderfully before 02/05/07 where
the libc6 upgrade and a slew of other packages came through.
After this
debian/changelog |5 -
debian/watch |2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 0d6c6efdb89df678812020c4c9dfac9bbc9eaa7a
Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun Jun 3 18:33:04 2007 +0200
Fix watch file.
diff --git a/debian/chang
On Sun, 3 Jun 2007, Brice Goglin wrote:
From what I see in the log, the ATI board is correctly initialized by
the ati driver 6.6.3, but the nvidia driver is not found for the nvidia
board. It would mean that the bug is not related to ATI+nvidia/nv
dual-head, and actually appears with single-head
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg-server
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #341376
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2368
# * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-tseng
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #394687
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11106
# * remote status changed: (
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 1:7.2.ds2-2
Severity: normal
I tried to swap my mouse buttons with xmodmap -e "pointer 3 2 1"
xmodmap warns that it changes only the first three buttons, and the
mouse is not remapped. However, xmodmap -pp shows the buttons swapped.
Mapping all 12 buttons does not
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-intel
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #426893
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10706
# * remote status changed: (
Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> On Mon, 28 May 2007, Brice Goglin wrote:
>> I am just pinging you about this bug in case there has been any
>> improvement with the latest releases of xserver-xorg-core and/or
>> xserver-xorg-video-nv currently in experimental. If they helped, please
>> let me know.
>
> Hi
On Mon, 28 May 2007, Brice Goglin wrote:
I am just pinging you about this bug in case there has been any
improvement with the latest releases of xserver-xorg-core and/or
xserver-xorg-video-nv currently in experimental. If they helped, please
let me know.
Hi. Sorry it took a while to get round t
64 matches
Mail list logo
