Processed: severity of 445029 is wishlist, severity of 445026 is wishlist

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.8 > severity 445029 wishlist Bug#445029: compiz-gtk: Can't raise windows by clicking on an edge Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > severity 445026 wishlist Bug#445026: compiz: Al

Bug#428091: Disabling DDC

Andrew Ruthven wrote: > Okay, I've installed xserver-xorg-core-dbg, but how do I tell X.org to > use these debug modules instead? > There's nothing to do. The server still uses the same modules, but gdb will know where to look for the corresponding debugging symbols that xserver-xorg-core-dbg i

Bug#242216: marked as done (xserver-xfree86: [debconf] monitor selection method defaults to advanced in too many siutations)

Your message dated Thu, 04 Oct 2007 08:34:30 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#242216: xserver-xfree86.config hardcodes different defaults for display selection method on different priorities has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#445023: compiz: Problem with struts on top and left panels

Tony Houghton wrote: > I use ROX-Filer which has panels you can use a bit like GNOME panels. > However, only panels on the bottom or right screen edge work correctly. > Top and left panels are placed away from the edge by the same distance > as the struts they set to make other windows avoid them.

Bug#443936: xserver-xorg-video-mga: windowmaker and 1.9.99 get along terribly

kls wrote: > I finally got around to upgrading my laptop (ATI M6LY)'s install of > sid, and found that this is *not* a problem in the mga driver. It's a > problem in some other random xorg component, presumably > libxcomposite1. > > To work around it, I have to disable both the Composite extension

Bug#445100: xserver-xorg: Ctl-Alt-Fx has stopped working after a fresh install

clayton wrote: > Package: xserver-xorg > Version: 1:7.3+2 > Severity: normal > > > I just did a fresh install to a new hard-drive, everything up-to-date to > the latest "testing". Now when I hit Ctl-Alt-F1, instead of getting a > console, the keyboard and mouse are locked up. This happens at both

Bug#364587: marked as done (manpage for xfs.options(5) mentioned in /etc/X11/fs/xfs.options not available)

Your message dated Thu, 04 Oct 2007 01:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#364587: fixed in xfs 1:1.0.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

xfs_1.0.5-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: xfs_1.0.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xfs/xfs_1.0.5-1.diff.gz xfs_1.0.5-1.dsc to pool/main/x/xfs/xfs_1.0.5-1.dsc xfs_1.0.5-1_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xfs/xfs_1.0.5-1_i386.deb xfs_1.0.5.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/x/xfs/xfs_1.0.5.orig.tar.gz Override entries for your package: xfs_1.0.5

xfs: Changes to 'refs/tags/xfs-1_1.0.5-1'

Tag 'xfs-1_1.0.5-1' created by David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-10-04 01:18 + Tagging upload of xfs-1_1.0.5-1 to unstable. Changes since xfs-1_1.0.4-2: Ademar de Souza Reis Jr (1): Document catalogue: feature Brice Goglin (1): Restore and update the old debian/local/xfs

xfs: Changes to 'upstream-unstable'

configure.ac|4 +++- difs/dispatch.c | 13 + difs/fontinfo.c | 19 +++ xfs.man | 39 --- 4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) New commits: commit 0bd59b5938059c7ff5501b928ebe80ecea27f008 Author: Mat

xfs: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

configure.ac |4 +- debian/changelog | 11 +- debian/patches/01_xfs_fixes.diff | 64 +-- difs/dispatch.c | 13 +++ difs/fontinfo.c | 19 +++ xfs.man

Processing of xfs_1.0.5-1_i386.changes

xfs_1.0.5-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xfs_1.0.5-1.dsc xfs_1.0.5.orig.tar.gz xfs_1.0.5-1.diff.gz xfs_1.0.5-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Re: libpciaccess: Changes to 'refs/tags/libpciaccess-0.8.0+git20071002-1'

On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 08:13:40AM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > David Nusinow wrote: > > Tag 'libpciaccess-0.8.0+git20071002-1' created by David Nusinow <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> at 2007-10-03 01:44 + > > > > Tagging upload of libpciaccess-0.8.0+git20071002-1 to experimental. > > > > Changes sin

Re: Prefer nvidia over nv when available

On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 11:08:29AM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Hi David, > > |--==> David Nusinow writes: > > DN> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 11:30:26PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > >>Hi all, > >> > >>is there a way to instruct the script(s) that generate the xorg.conf > >>file at inst

[bts-link] source package xserver-xorg-video-intel

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-intel # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #445067 # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11932 # * remote status changed: (

[bts-link] source package xorg-server

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg-server # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #413424 # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11073 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW use

Bug#242216: xserver-xfree86.config hardcodes different defaults for display selection method on different priorities

> tags 242216 - patch > reassign 242216 xserver-xorg > kthxbye > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2004 at 11:29:46 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: > > > > Could you please explain what you mean? > > > > > > Sure. > > > ... > > > I am referring to the large case statement at line 990 of > > > xserver-xfree86.

Bug#443936: xserver-xorg-video-mga: windowmaker and 1.9.99 get along terribly

> kls wrote: > > The previously observed abysmal 2d performance seems to be triggered > > by WindowMaker. This does not seem to be a compositing problem, > > because it is identical regardless of whether I have DRI enabled or > > not. It also appears independent of number of active screens. > > > >

Processed: Re: Bug#445067: upgrade breaks EDID probing with Intel 945GM chipset

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forcemerge 437066 445067 Bug#437066: xserver-xorg-video-intel: refuses 1366x768 because detects 1024x768 panel size Bug#445067: xorg: upgrade breaks EDID probing with Intel 945GM chipset Forcibly Merged 437066 445067. > thank you Stopping processing h

Bug#445067: upgrade breaks EDID probing with Intel 945GM chipset

forcemerge 437066 445067 thank you James R. Van Zandt wrote: > Here's the revised report. I see the EDID information does appear now, so > your diagnosis looks right. > > [...] > > (II) intel(0): Not using default mode "1024x768" (exceeds panel dimensions) > (II) intel(0): Not using default mod

Bug#445097: bitmap program disappeared?!

On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 11:50:53AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > Yes, I did the original split, but didn't think that anyone actually used > bitmap :) (it isn't included in Fedora, for instance) > > Anyway, it will be added to x11-apps. Thanks! For what it's worth, this program, simple as it is,

Re: Prefer nvidia over nv when available

Hi David, |--==> David Nusinow writes: DN> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 11:30:26PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: >>Hi all, >> >>is there a way to instruct the script(s) that generate the xorg.conf >>file at installation time to prefer nvidia over nv when the first is >>available? (and possi

Bug#356558: marked as done (xserver-xorg: Matrox 550 DVI port doesn't work)

Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:50:03 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 1:1.9.100.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#445097: bitmap program disappeared?!

On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Rich Felker wrote: Package: xbase-clients Version: 1:7.3+2 Severity: normal The program 'bitmap' from the standard X clients seems to have disappeared with the split of the xbase-clients package. As far I can can tell it is gone, not moved to another package. I use this prog

Bug#445100: xserver-xorg: Ctl-Alt-Fx has stopped working after a fresh install

Package: xserver-xorg Version: 1:7.3+2 Severity: normal I just did a fresh install to a new hard-drive, everything up-to-date to the latest "testing". Now when I hit Ctl-Alt-F1, instead of getting a console, the keyboard and mouse are locked up. This happens at both the gdm login prompt and wh

Bug#445097: bitmap program disappeared?!

Package: xbase-clients Version: 1:7.3+2 Severity: normal The program 'bitmap' from the standard X clients seems to have disappeared with the split of the xbase-clients package. As far I can can tell it is gone, not moved to another package. I use this program frequently and consider its disappeara

Bug#372067: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-mga: Please explicitly say in the package description and man page what the driver is capable of)

Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:50:03 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 1:1.9.100.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#324500: marked as done (mga: G550 Dualhead)

Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:50:03 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 1:1.9.100.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#376326: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-mga: MGA G550 DVI output doesn't work)

Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:50:03 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 1:1.9.100.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#372079: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-mga: strange frequency behavior with dvi)

Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:50:03 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 1:1.9.100.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#444114: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-mga: Xinerama not working since last update)

Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:50:03 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 1:1.9.100.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#337694: marked as done (xserver-xorg: Second display not used on Matrox G550.)

Your message dated Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:50:03 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in 1:1.9.100.dfsg.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

Bug#444183: works for me...

Package: xserver-xorg-input-mouse Followup-For: Bug #444183 I wonder why it does not work for you... however it works here on this mbp1,1 ... -- Package-specific info: Contents of /var/lib/x11/X.roster: xserver-xorg /etc/X11/X target unchanged from checksum in /var/lib/x11/X.md5sum. X server s

Bug#420350: Fwd: Bug#420350: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Bug in driver

2007/10/3, Brice Goglin: > > Thanks I am looking forward for that. Can You post direct url ? > > http://people.debian.org/~bgoglin/rebuilds/i810/1.7.2-Xserver1.4/ > > Untested, of course :) Tested. ~$ glxinfo | grep render dir