On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 23:34:51 -0600, Joseph Neal wrote:
> X fails to start following today's upgrade. A hard reset is required to
> restore any kind of functionality. I used
> 'dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg" to get a fresh xorg.conf which failed to make
> a difference.
>
Try disabling DRI
But the workaround for this bug was already mentioned on 3 November in Dwayne
Litzenberger's response (see above) to this bug... It can attest that it
works, so no need to be without Sid for over a week while waiting for the
upgrade to wend its way through uploads.
--
Henk Koster
"Behavioral a
> Michel Dänzer a écrit :
>
>>> Did a killall compiz.real, which restarts it. The behaviour is the same
>>> as before : the first terminal is ok, the second one is sluggish.
>>>
>>
>> Note how both windows were created before the second compiz instance
>> started, which contradicts your theory.
>>
This company proved to all about its record breaking growth in a short time
period, and in long term aswell.
Its the right time to invest in it, for a long term investment, Tuesday`s open
will be something amazing for
all investors, just dont miss your chance.
>> d m h n .p k <<
(D.Y.N.A.M.I.C M
This company proved to all about its record breaking growth in a short time
period, and in long term aswell.
Its the right time to invest in it, for a long term investment, Tuesday`s open
will be something amazing for
all investors, just dont miss your chance.
>> d m h n .p k <<
(D.Y.N.A.M.I.C M
This company proved to all about its record breaking growth in a short time
period, and in long term aswell.
Its the right time to invest in it, for a long term investment, Tuesday`s open
will be something amazing for
all investors, just dont miss your chance.
>> d m h n .p k <<
(D.Y.N.A.M.I.C M
please can you give any information about this bug??
Package: compiz
Severity: important
Version: 0.6.3~git20071104.c9009efd-1
Tags: patch
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
the current version of compiz has unsatisfied Build-Depends on
libfuse-dev under non-linux ports.
Please, could you exclude linux specific package in Build-Dep
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.10
> forcemerge 448863 450894
Bug#448863: xserver-xorg: Package can not be installed (so is mostly unuseable)
Bug#450894: problem installing xserver-xorg in unstable
Forcibly Merged 44886
configs/debian-default|1 -
configs/debian-osmesa-default |4
debian/changelog |8
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit 4971a009e0dd9a68be4b4ca679765ab23e37717d
Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue No
debian/changelog |3 ++-
debian/control |2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 1bf7ce97c01e391bb3debc04fdc5e24543334e97
Author: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue Nov 13 21:40:49 2007 +0100
* Add build-dep on libxext-dev. Thanks, Ti
debian/changelog |7 +++
debian/patches/evdev_no_flush_on_init.diff | 20
debian/patches/series |1 +
man/evdev.man |2 +-
4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commit
Tag 'xserver-xorg-input-evdev-1_1.2.0-git20070819-4' created by Julien Cristau
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-11-13 20:58 +
Tagging upload of xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:1.2.0~git20070819-4 to unstable.
Changes since xserver-xorg-input-evdev-1_1.2.0_git20070819-3:
Julien Cristau (2):
New p
xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.2.0~git20070819-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully
to localhost
along with the files:
xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.2.0~git20070819-4.dsc
xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.2.0~git20070819-4.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.2.0~git20070819-4_i386.deb
Greetings,
Accepted:
xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.2.0~git20070819-4.diff.gz
to
pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-input-evdev/xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.2.0~git20070819-4.diff.gz
xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.2.0~git20070819-4.dsc
to
pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-input-evdev/xserver-xorg-input-evdev_1.2.0~git20070819-4.ds
Tag 'mesa-7.0.2-2' created by Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at 2007-11-13
20:35 +
Tagging upload of mesa 7.0.2-2 to unstable.
Changes since mesa-7.0.2-1:
Brice Goglin (1):
Prepare changelog for upload
Julien Cristau (2):
Don't set -fno-strict-aliasing in configs/debian-defaul
debian/changelog |5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit ae0bf74db93b5c3f9260fefd3546dccfea1e80fc
Author: Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue Nov 13 21:44:00 2007 +0100
Prepare changelog for upload
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/cha
mesa_7.0.2-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mesa_7.0.2-2.dsc
mesa_7.0.2-2.diff.gz
libgl1-mesa-dev_7.0.2-2_all.deb
mesa-common-dev_7.0.2-2_all.deb
mesa-swx11-source_7.0.2-2_all.deb
libgl1-mesa-swx11_7.0.2-2_i386.deb
libgl1-mesa-swx11-dbg_7.0.2-2_i
New branch 'ubuntu' available with the following commits:
commit cdbd6982b7b1bde03adfe1f1f0f3a2e778c5c14f
Author: Timo Aaltonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED](none)>
Date: Thu Nov 8 08:13:15 2007 +0200
Prepare changelog for upload.
commit b9e483ae40f58534e76e1c2f15e3d37a1c7c0347
Merge: 017d13843d43ac1f
New branch 'ubuntu' available with the following commits:
commit b9c9d184aeefef8e7d2090efa1dadcecff66582a
Author: Timo Aaltonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED](none)>
Date: Sat Nov 10 15:27:09 2007 +0200
Brown paper bag release: include all the patches.
Building the source package filtered one p
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
libgl1-mesa-dri_7.0.2-2_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override
says extra.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and t
Accepted:
libgl1-mesa-dev_7.0.2-2_all.deb
to pool/main/m/mesa/libgl1-mesa-dev_7.0.2-2_all.deb
libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg_7.0.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/mesa/libgl1-mesa-dri-dbg_7.0.2-2_i386.deb
libgl1-mesa-dri_7.0.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/m/mesa/libgl1-mesa-dri_7.0.2-2_i386.deb
libgl1-mesa-glx-db
Hi,
as Jörg mentioned in his mail
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/11/msg2.html), packets
uploaded in a short period around the occurence of the hardware problem might
still be missing in the repositories.
So, could you perhaps verify if your new xserver-xorg packet was
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 00:09:20 +0100, Matthias Breier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as Jörg mentioned in his mail
> (http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/11/msg2.html),
> packets uploaded in a short period around the occurence of the hardware
> problem might still be missing in the repos
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-intel
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remot
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg-server
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status repo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report for
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-intel
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #435621
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12262
# * remote status changed: N
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #445236
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10304
# * remote status changed: (?) -> RESOLVED
# *
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package mesa
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #439668
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12164
# * remote status changed: RESOLVED -> REOPENED
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg-server
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #449238
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13078
# * remote status changed: NEW -> RESOLVE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-ati
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-ati
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #447321
# * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1082
# * remote status changed: NEW
> No it doesn't break unrelated software :)
I thought that might be a stretch. The Gimp doesn't work too well without it
though.
> Did you just upgrade xserver-xorg-video-savage? or anything else?
> The previous package (1:2.1.3-3) is available from
It was a full 'aptitude safe-upgrade' bringi
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Cristau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 09:07 AM
> To: 'Joseph Neal', [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug#451074: xserver-xorg-video-savage: X fails to start locking
> system after upgrade
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 23:34
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
webvinz . com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
54 matches
Mail list logo
