Bug#438426: xserver-xorg-video-i810: Suspend to RAM doesn't work

On Sunday 25 November 2007 22:33:19 Brice Goglin wrote: Having the kernel change the behavior like this is interesting. Do you happen to have a framebuffer console running? (with intelfb or vesafb kernel module or so). No, I don't (at least there's no such module listed by lsmod). Also, you

xorg: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

debian/changelog |6 -- debian/control |2 +- debian/rules |8 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) New commits: commit 1072b68ec2c1b9c527ec4aba740b06cab8eb13ca Author: David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun Dec 16 10:35:16 2007 -0500 Prepare

Bug#147716: Enter the New Year without ED_dysfunction

Hello Your holiday would be not full without gd se.. http://sensefollow.com Kerstin mcclafferty And everyone said, 'How tall they've grown! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#451293: marked as done (xorg: mass bug filing for cross build support)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:02:10 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#451293: fixed in xorg 1:7.3+8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#210309: Become a se.[EMAIL PROTECTED] marathon champion with our offer

Hello Your holiday would be not full without gd se.. http://meanthard.com Kerstin mcclafferty And besides, to the Crumpetty Tree -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: notfound 455539 in latest

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 notfound 455539 latest Bug#455539: please bring back the -core metapackage Bug no longer marked as found in version latest. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Processing of compiz_0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1_amd64.changes

compiz_0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: compiz_0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1.dsc compiz_0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14.orig.tar.gz compiz_0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1.diff.gz compiz_0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1_all.deb

Bug#437207: xserver-xorg-video-i810: X Locks up randomly

Package: xserver-xorg-video-i810 Version: 2:2.2.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #437207 X will crash pretty frequently for me and I have no idea if there is any exact cause. I have DRI and composite enabled, but it will crash both when running metacity or compiz. (After the crash restart also fails,

compiz_0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: compiz-core_0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/c/compiz/compiz-core_0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1_amd64.deb compiz-dev_0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/c/compiz/compiz-dev_0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1_amd64.deb

Bug#454055: Subject: xserver-xorg: Sproingies xscreensaver crashes X session

On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 21:11 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: Also, it would be very good to catch a debugging backtrace with gdb. I installed xserver-xorg-core-dbg and tried attaching to the running X server using gdb, but that didn't generate any useful info: $ cat ~root/gdb.txt Attaching to

Bug#390929: marked as done (compiz: Another window manager is already running on screen: 0)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#390929: fixed in compiz 0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#446901: marked as done (compiz ignores gconf modifications and number_of_desktops value)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#446901: fixed in compiz 0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#390929: marked as done (compiz: Another window manager is already running on screen: 0)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#400583: fixed in compiz 0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#393501: marked as done (compiz: Please add Xgl support to wrapper)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#393501: fixed in compiz 0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#445026: marked as done (compiz: Always uses gtk-window-decorator)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#445026: fixed in compiz 0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#440095: marked as done (compiz should enable many plugins by default, at least decoration)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#447345: fixed in compiz 0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#447345: marked as done (compiz doesn't seem to start)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#440095: fixed in compiz 0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#447345: marked as done (compiz doesn't seem to start)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#447345: fixed in compiz 0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#440095: marked as done (compiz should enable many plugins by default, at least decoration)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#440095: fixed in compiz 0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#449389: marked as done (compiz-kde: kde-window-decorator starts but has no effect)

Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2007 17:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#449389: fixed in compiz 0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#455750: compizconfig-settings-manager: Errors when installing

It seems you have python2.3 still installed. What other python packages you have installed? (you can run 'dpkg --get-selections |grep python|awk '{print $1}'|xargs dpkg --list') How python-support handles these conflicts/problems? Maybe someone can help us. I think that a dependency to

Re: Bug#455750: compizconfig-settings-manager: Errors when installing

On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 18:42:49 +0100, Emilio Scalise wrote: It seems you have python2.3 still installed. What other python packages you have installed? (you can run 'dpkg --get-selections |grep python|awk '{print $1}'|xargs dpkg --list') Emilio, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address doesn't reach

Re: compiz-manager script in compiz package

hey emilio, On Sunday 16 December 2007 06:22:57 pm emisca wrote: Do you have considered inclusion of the compiz-manager (http://releases.compiz-fusion.org/0.6.0/compiz-manager-0.6.0.tar.gz) in the compiz package, or as a new separate package? i guess we were thinking the same thing... because

Bug#454055: Subject: xserver-xorg: Sproingies xscreensaver crashes X session

On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 18:25 +0100, I wrote: Any pointers? Thomas I tried the version 1 hint (batch script) from http://xorg.freedesktop.org/wiki/Development/Documentation/ServerDebugging and found the crash didn't occur when I called /usr/bin/X directly. One problem is that I don't

Bug#454055: Info received (Bug#454055: Subject: xserver-xorg: Sproingies xscreensaver crashes X session)

Well, here we go again. I finally managed a backtrace using the core dump method (and yes, this froze my machine :-) Hope this is of help for somebody. Thomas Script started on Sun Dec 16 21:53:17 2007 meiner:~# gdb /etc/X11/X /etc/X11/core GNU gdb 6.6.90.20070912-debian Copyright (C)

Bug#456604: xserver-xorg-input-evdev: Option Name no longer works

Package: xserver-xorg-input-evdev Version: 1:1.2.0-1 Severity: important No mouse is found when using Options Name mousename or Dev Phys dev -- Package-specific info: Contents of /var/lib/x11/X.roster: xserver-xorg /var/lib/x11/X.md5sum does not exist. X server symlink status: lrwxrwxrwx 1

Processed: [bts-link] source package xserver-xorg-video-ati

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-ati # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). # remote

Processed: [bts-link] source package xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]). # remote

[bts-link] source package xserver-xorg-video-ati

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-ati # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #444049 # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12544 # * remote status changed:

[bts-link] source package compiz

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package compiz # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #428974 # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9077 # * remote status changed: (?) - RESOLVED # *

[bts-link] source package xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #447808 # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12907 # * remote status

[bts-link] source package xserver-xorg-video-mga

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-mga # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #452223 # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12811 # * remote status changed:

[bts-link] source package xserver-xorg-video-intel

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-video-intel # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #443809 # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10773 # * remote status changed:

[bts-link] source package xorg-server

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg-server # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #452167 # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13511 # * remote status changed: (?) - NEW

[bts-link] source package xserver-xorg-input-mouse

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xserver-xorg-input-mouse # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #454546 # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13662 # * remote status changed:

[bts-link] source package mesa

# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package mesa # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #455682 # * https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12164 # * remote status changed: (?) - REOPENED

Bug#456625: compiz: Wobbly windows plugin should allow snapping to edges without sticking to edges

Package: compiz Version: 0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1 Severity: wishlist I like the behavior of snapping to the edges of the screen or to other windows by requiring a bit of resistance to push the edge of the dragged window past the edge of the screen or another window. However, I do not like the

Processed: reassign 456625 to compiz-plugins

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 reassign 456625 compiz-plugins Bug#456625: compiz: Wobbly windows plugin should allow snapping to edges without sticking to edges Bug reassigned from package `compiz' to

Bug#456628: compiz: fails to start when POSIXLY_CORRECT is set

Package: compiz Version: 0.6.3~git20071208.25941d14-1 Severity: important Tags: patch When POSIXLY_CORRECT is set, compiz fails to start: lakeview ok % Checking for Xgl: not present. Detected PCI ID for VGA: 00:02.0 0300: 8086:27a2 (rev 03) (prog-if 00 [VGA]) Checking for texture_from_pixmap: