Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 14:41:24 +0200, Marc Brockschmidt wrote: * How many big transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should those happen? Can we do something to make them easier? One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with their Q4 2009 release (meaning

Bug#545220: #545220 xterm: mutt line-character graphics show up wrong

2009-09-09 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 06:04:58PM -0700, Paul Vojta wrote: XTerm.vt100.boldFont: lucidasanstypewriter-bold-14 XTerm.vt100.font: lucidasanstypewriter-14 this does something odd - will investigate/fix (thanks) -- Thomas E. Dickey dic...@invisible-island.net http://invisible-island.net

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Bastian Blank
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something we'll want for squeeze, depending on the freeze date you pick). Oh, no. Not again. It

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something we'll want for

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Andreas Barth
* Bastian Blank (wa...@debian.org) [090909 12:37]: On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with their Q4 2009 release (meaning December this year, so probably something we'll want for squeeze, depending

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: One more thing. Intel plans to deprecate userspace mode setting with their Q4 2009 release (meaning

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 14:42:52 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 13:31 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: This might

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 09 septembre 2009 à 14:04 +0200, Andreas Barth a écrit : If not at X side, is it a possibility to either (a) add the new memory manager to lenny (I assume not), or (b) tell the users you need to upgrade your kernel first (and make the new X pre-depending somehow on the kernel).

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Bastian Blank
[ Remove -release, this is technical stuff. ] On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:31:36PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Is KMS backward compatible with older versions of the intel driver? No :/ What happens when a old driver runs on a KMS

Re: X.org plans for the squeeze cycle

2009-09-09 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 18:05 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: [ Remove -release, this is technical stuff. ] On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:31:36PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:36:58 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Is KMS backward compatible with older versions of the intel

Bug#540876: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Very slow/lazy graphic card

2009-09-09 Thread Martin Šín
Hi again, you are right. linux-image without bigmem is much better. I will stay with this kernel - this version works fine. Many thanks, Martin Sin. On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:18:26 +0200 Eric Estievenart eric.estieven...@free.fr wrote: I have the same slowdown on sid after switching to a bigmem

Bug#540876: marked as done (xserver-xorg-video-intel: Very slow/lazy graphic card)

2009-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:08:32 +0200 with message-id 4aa7ef20.6010...@ens-lyon.org and subject line Re: Bug#540876: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Very slow/lazy graphic card has caused the Debian Bug report #540876, regarding xserver-xorg-video-intel: Very slow/lazy graphic card to be

Bug#545220: #545220 xterm: mutt line-character graphics show up wrong

2009-09-09 Thread Thomas Dickey
It was an optimization that wasn't completely right (fix will be in #248). For reference, current changes toward #248 are attached. -- Thomas E. Dickey dic...@invisible-island.net http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net xterm-247a.patch.gz Description: Binary data

xserver-xorg-video-ati: Changes to 'upstream-unstable'

2009-09-09 Thread Brice Goglin
configure.ac |2 src/ati_pciids_gen.h | 15 + src/atombios_output.c | 479 +++--- src/pcidb/ati_pciids.csv | 25 + src/r600_exa.c| 11 src/r600_textured_videofuncs.c|1

xserver-xorg-video-ati: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

2009-09-09 Thread Brice Goglin
ChangeLog | 167 + configure.ac |2 debian/changelog |7 src/ati_pciids_gen.h |5 src/atombios_output.c | 479 +++--- src/pcidb/ati_pciids.csv

xserver-xorg-video-ati: Changes to 'refs/tags/xserver-xorg-video-ati-1_6.12.3-1'

2009-09-09 Thread Brice Goglin
Tag 'xserver-xorg-video-ati-1_6.12.3-1' created by Brice Goglin bgog...@debian.org at 2009-09-10 05:52 + Tagging upload of xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.12.3-1 to unstable. Changes since xserver-xorg-video-ati-1_6.12.2-3: Adam Jackson (1): Fix misleading filenames in DRI setup failure

Processing of xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.12.3-1_i386.changes

2009-09-09 Thread Archive Administrator
xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.12.3-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.12.3-1.dsc xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.12.3.orig.tar.gz xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.12.3-1.diff.gz xserver-xorg-video-ati_6.12.3-1_i386.deb