Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeon
Version: 1:6.12.3-1
I also get those random crashes on debian/unstable since upgrading xserver and
KDE. It often happens when I start applications like Konqueror, especially
when another application, e.g. VDR is already running. This did not happen
before the
Ping...
On So, 25 Okt 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > Wrong. The device file is grabbed by the driver when the first device
> > (the xorg.conf one) is initialized. The automatically added device then
> > just sits idle because it doesn't get any events.
>
> Then why are the settings in xorg.c
Hello,
I recently upgraded my kernel to 2.6.30-2 from 2.6.22-something, and the
crashes no longer happen.
This could explain why other people had trouble reproducing this bug.
Maybe this could be resolved by a Conflicts: or Depends: line.
Regards
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 20:13 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Did you even check? AFAICT all the relevant patches are in 1.6.4.
You're right, the changelog is mentioning the relevant patches were
merged somewhere between 1.6.4RC1 and 1.6.4.
BUT, since g-p-m is still reporting a broken display driver
The bug fix in http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=30489 fixed the
problem for me. I hope that this fix can be applied to the next version of
xkb-data.
my /etc/default/console-setup contains
XKBMODEL="apple"
XKBLAYOUT="us+stuart+level3(win_switch)+ctrl(nocaps)"
XKBVARIANT=""
XKBOPTIO
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 552361 normal
Bug #552361 [xserver-xorg-core] xserver-xorg-core: Broken display server causes
gnome-power-manager blanking issues
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'
> tag 552361 - patch
Bug #552361 [xserver-xorg-core] xserver-xor
severity 552361 normal
tag 552361 - patch
kthxbye
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 19:13:31 +0100, Apelete Seketeli wrote:
> gnome-power-manger has recently been updated to 2.28, and it is reporting a
> problem with the display server:
>
> Seesion active, not inhibited, screen idle.
> If you can see this
act ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: compiz
Version: 0.8.2-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091028 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevan
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 09:54:06 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 5:27 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > ... and now I wonder if the foo.alias files really need to stay in /etc,
> > or if we can move them somewhere else where they'll be removed with the
> > correspond
Source: compiz
Version: 0.8.2-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091028 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> ** Using build dependencies supplied
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 14:55 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 18:16 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Release planning
> >
> > Proposing a new freeze date is not easy. Taking into account all of
> > the feedback we have received, both online (by e-mail, IRC) as well a
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 15:05 +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> If there are no howling cries of outrage, I'll create libxfont1.3
> branches and packages to do this.
I'd prefer to see it die sooner rather than adding that kind of kludges,
but well, it's not my time, so...
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSC
12 matches
Mail list logo
