libdrm_2.4.82-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:libdrm-common is NEW. binary:libdrm-common is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are

Processing of libdrm_2.4.82-1_amd64.changes

libdrm_2.4.82-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libdrm_2.4.82-1.dsc libdrm_2.4.82.orig.tar.gz libdrm_2.4.82-1.diff.gz libdrm-amdgpu1-dbgsym_2.4.82-1_amd64.deb libdrm-amdgpu1_2.4.82-1_amd64.deb libdrm-common_2.4.82-1_all.deb

libdrm: Changes to 'refs/tags/libdrm-2.4.82-1'

Tag 'libdrm-2.4.82-1' created by Emilio Pozuelo Monfort at 2017-07-28 20:45 + Tagging upload of libdrm 2.4.82-1 to unstable. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEcJymx+vmJZxd92Q+nUbEiOQ2gwIFAll7olIACgkQnUbEiOQ2

libdrm: Changes to 'debian-unstable'

debian/changelog |6 -- debian/control |2 +- debian/rules |4 ++-- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) New commits: commit fc3d4a6ecc5435f07b9408249042d61f667487ba Author: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort Date: Fri Jul 28 22:40:23 2017 +0200

Bug#869773: xdm logs failed logins that may be sensitive

Le decadi 10 thermidor, an CCXXV, Julien Cristau a écrit : > Isn't that true pretty much whichever way you log in (ssh, login, ...), > not just xdm? Probably. I just noticed it and verified it on xdm. If other login prompts have the same issue, a common solution may be better. Note that with

Bug#870006: xserver-xorg: X60 libreboot Xorg hangs reproducibly after upgrade to stretch

Package: xserver-xorg Version: 1:7.7+19 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, After upgrading to Stretch, X stopped working. - Encrpytion password can be entered - Rescue mode can be started successfully - After trying to start graphical mode screen always stays black with a non-blinking cursor

Bug#869773: xdm logs failed logins that may be sensitive

On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 21:06:47 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > The unknown username should not be in the log, login(1) replaces names > of non-existent users with "UNKNOWN" when logging failed attempts. > How about this then (not even build tested): diff --git a/greeter/greet.c b/greeter/greet.c

Bug#869773: xdm logs failed logins that may be sensitive

On 2017-07-28 20:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:51:10 +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > >> Package: xdm >> Version: 1:1.1.11-3 >> Severity: normal >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> >> When somebody tries to log in and fails, xdm writes the given user name in >> the system

Bug#869773: xdm logs failed logins that may be sensitive

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:51:10 +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Package: xdm > Version: 1:1.1.11-3 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > When somebody tries to log in and fails, xdm writes the given user name in > the system logs. Unfortunately, typing the password in the login field is a

Processed: Re: Bug#866031: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics: Breaks xserver-xorg-input-libinput on jessie → stretch upgrade

Processing control commands: > tag -1 - l10n Bug #866031 [xserver-xorg-input-synaptics] xserver-xorg-input-synaptics: Breaks xserver-xorg-input-libinput on jessie → stretch upgrade Removed tag(s) l10n. -- 866031: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866031 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#866031: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics: Breaks xserver-xorg-input-libinput on jessie → stretch upgrade

Control: tag -1 - l10n On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 19:29:49 +0100, Conrad Hughes wrote: > Package: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics > Version: 1.9.0-1+b1 > Severity: normal > Tags: l10n > > Dear Maintainer, > > I've just upgraded from jessie to stretch on a laptop with a "SynPS/2 > Synaptics >

Bug#869773: xdm logs failed logins that may be sensitive

At 2017-07-26T11:51:10+0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Package: xdm > Version: 1:1.1.11-3 > Severity: normal > > Dear Maintainer, > > When somebody tries to log in and fails, xdm writes the given user name in > the system logs. Unfortunately, typing the password in the login field is a > common

Re: Info over uw diensten

Beste, Waarschijnlijk is onderstaande e-mail u even ontsnapt, u mag mij gerust doorverwijzen naar een collega, ik vond ondertussen de naam van jullie zaakvoerder niet echt terug, zou dit een goeie ingang zijn? Met vriendelijke groeten, Daphne Winants +32 2 669 90 60