On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:57:52AM +0100, Michael Piefel wrote:
> I see.
>
> For me, that means I'm going to continue using the debconfized X config
> the way I already do: Make an initial XF86Config-4, and then edit it by
> hand. Actually, that's OK for me, altough it would be nice to get not
> o
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:57:52AM +0100, Michael Piefel wrote:
> I see.
>
> For me, that means I'm going to continue using the debconfized X config
> the way I already do: Make an initial XF86Config-4, and then edit it by
> hand. Actually, that's OK for me, altough it would be nice to get not
> o
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:50:55PM +0100, Michael Piefel wrote:
> As an advanced option, one should be able to enter arbitrary sizes.
I disagree. That is beyond the intended scope of the X server debconf
support.
Quoting dexconf(8):
It is also important to note that dexconf, and the co
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:50:55PM +0100, Michael Piefel wrote:
> As an advanced option, one should be able to enter arbitrary sizes.
I disagree. That is beyond the intended scope of the X server debconf
support.
Quoting dexconf(8):
It is also important to note that dexconf, and the co
4 matches
Mail list logo
