probably become
true fairly soon.
It's not a particularly good idea though; if you've got an RC bug,
you need to fix it, not find ways to get it ignored.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred
changed to:
] pending
] A solution to this bug has been found and an upload will be
] made soon.
The (release critical) bugs above have been tagged pending for over a
month, so by the new definition the tag appears to not apply to the above
bugs.
--
Anthony Towns
changed to:
] pending
] A solution to this bug has been found and an upload will be
] made soon.
The (release critical) bugs above have been tagged pending for over a
month, so by the new definition the tag appears to not apply to the above
bugs.
--
Anthony Towns
/etc/motd | wc -c` `./gzip /etc/motd | md5sum | cut -d\ -f1`
277 e73b4f30720cf2a29c2b774078237ea4
Note that i386 has an assembly implementation of longest_match() which
may or may not have the bug.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak
this be looked into, please?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations --
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
/etc/motd | wc -c` `./gzip /etc/motd | md5sum | cut -d\ -f1`
277 e73b4f30720cf2a29c2b774078237ea4
Note that i386 has an assembly implementation of longest_match() which
may or may not have the bug.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak
this be looked into, please?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations --
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
reassign 128101 xserver-xfree86
thanks
The lockup occurs under the following
condition:
the frame buffer device (atyfb) is loaded and used by console. Start a
second X-server from an xterm on the first X-server.
If I start a second X-server from the console, even a fb-enabled console,
reassign 128101 xserver-xfree86
thanks
The lockup occurs under the following
condition:
the frame buffer device (atyfb) is loaded and used by console. Start a
second X-server from an xterm on the first X-server.
If I start a second X-server from the console, even a fb-enabled console,
as a mailing list.
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 09:10:13AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
I'd marked that bug as applying to the version in testing way back before
woody was released. So either no or it was already special cased.
Oh ah. Is that marking visible in any publicly-readable file?
auric:/org
as a mailing list.
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 09:10:13AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
I'd marked that bug as applying to the version in testing way back before
woody was released. So either no or it was already special cased.
Oh ah. Is that marking visible in any publicly-readable file?
auric:/org
the package from being considered. That was the case
for xutils until you downgraded the bug.
And in any event it already went in today, along with pam.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred
uploaded for about eight days -- so it would've been too young to be a
valid candidate.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do
the package from being considered. That was the case
for xutils until you downgraded the bug.
And in any event it already went in today, along with pam.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 04:48:58AM -0500, Anthony Towns wrote:
X4 hasn't gone into woody yet; somehow or other it's breaking the testing
update scripts --- blowing out the runtime from 20 minutes in total to
more like 10 or 20 hours (I haven't let it run to see exactly).
Okay, so X4
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 04:48:58AM -0500, Anthony Towns wrote:
X4 hasn't gone into woody yet; somehow or other it's breaking the testing
update scripts --- blowing out the runtime from 20 minutes in total to
more like 10 or 20 hours (I haven't let it run to see exactly).
Okay, so X4
Hi all,
X4 hasn't gone into woody yet; somehow or other it's breaking the testing
update scripts --- blowing out the runtime from 20 minutes in total to
more like 10 or 20 hours (I haven't let it run to see exactly). I'll
poke around a bit more to try and fix this, but my net access is a
little
Hi all,
X4 hasn't gone into woody yet; somehow or other it's breaking the testing
update scripts --- blowing out the runtime from 20 minutes in total to
more like 10 or 20 hours (I haven't let it run to see exactly). I'll
poke around a bit more to try and fix this, but my net access is a
little
get hurt?
I think so. Branden?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Thanks to all avid pokers out there''
-- linux.conf.au, 17-20 January 2001
PGP signature
get hurt?
I think so. Branden?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Thanks to all avid pokers out there''
-- linux.conf.au, 17-20 January 2001
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:22:13PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:20:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
For reference: m68k is the only released architecture that doesn't have
X4 uploaded yet.
I know that.
I figured. :) It was the bit after that I thought
).
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Thanks to all avid pokers out there''
-- linux.conf.au, 17-20 January 2001
pgpjvbmRFavSf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:22:13PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:20:51PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
For reference: m68k is the only released architecture that doesn't have
X4 uploaded yet.
I know that.
I figured. :) It was the bit after that I thought might
).
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Thanks to all avid pokers out there''
-- linux.conf.au, 17-20 January 2001
PGP signature
. The Packages/Sources files may or may not end up pointing at
the symlinks rather than the pool. This will probably first happen
sometime after the changeover, but will definitely happen during
2.2r2.
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak for anyone
Hello world,
xfree86-xserver only has an unversioned dependency on xserver-common,
but includes binaries linked to the new glibc. Presumably there's a
shlib:Depends missing somewhere or something.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak
Hello world,
xfree86-xserver only has an unversioned dependency on xserver-common,
but includes binaries linked to the new glibc. Presumably there's a
shlib:Depends missing somewhere or something.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/
I don't speak
27 matches
Mail list logo
