Bug#272496: xserver-xfree86: [ati/radeon] power resume fails on iBook with Radeon Mobility M7 LW [regression from 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4]

2007-01-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 11:21:48PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: Hi Christoph, About 2 years ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding power resume failing on a iBook with a Radeon Mobility board. Did you reproduce this problem recently? If not, I will close this bug in the next

Re: xterm.deb build from Thomas E. Dickey's tree directly

2005-06-27 Thread Christoph Hellwig
ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: I've tried to build new xterm.deb package from Thomas' tree last weekend. I think it is 1st step for pruning xterm from xorg-x11 orig tarball (it is listed in TODO list of xorg-x11) Why would you want to prune it from the tarball? Not building it makes lots of

Re: Proposal on how to handle xorg include patches (WAS: Re: X Strike Force XOrg SVN commit: r28 - /)

2004-10-12 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 09:20:21AM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: | +| | +|-- xorg-source-include -- xorg-include Hi XSF, ~ as you might have noticed, we started

Re: new nv driver that should fix Xv extensions: please test!

2004-09-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 02:24:00PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: Hi everybody, thanks a lot for all the tests you have been done so far. I uploaded again a new nv driver that should fix the Xv extension here: http://people.no-name-yet.com/~fabbione/nv/i386/ Do you also have

Re: new nv driver that should fix Xv extensions: please test!

2004-09-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
They are up now: http://people.no-name-yet.com/~fabbione/nv/powerpc/ sorry.. the 2 files are bigger than the others because they haven't be stripped from the debugging symbols, but they will work as the normal one. This one works fine for me.

Bug#272496: [radeon] resume fails on iBook2

2004-09-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 When suspending my iBook the resume fails after resuming the sungem ethernet if I had been running X when suspending. Not runing X or downgrading to xserver-xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 from

Re: Bug#270228: [nv] GeForce FX 5200 Ultra DVI output messed up

2004-09-07 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 01:21:57PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 When I connect a flatpanel through a DVI cable with my G5 Mac that screen is completely garbled. An 'Option CrtcNumber 1' in XF84Config the picture almost except

Bug#270228: [nv] GeForce FX 5200 Ultra DVI output messed up

2004-09-06 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 When I connect a flatpanel through a DVI cable with my G5 Mac that screen is completely garbled. An 'Option CrtcNumber 1' in XF84Config the picture almost except the last ~1cm on the very right side are displayed on the very left. Replacing

Bug#270228: [nv] GeForce FX 5200 Ultra DVI output messed up

2004-09-06 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 03:50:19AM -0700, Daniel Stone wrote: On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 11:12:14AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: When I connect a flatpanel through a DVI cable with my G5 Mac that screen is completely garbled. An 'Option CrtcNumber 1' in XF84Config the picture almost except

Re: status of 2.6.7 ? (Was Re: Bug#256763: kernel-image-2.6.6-i386: not ready for sarge just yet)

2004-07-03 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 10:43:20PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: The /dev/psaux situation seems to be a big mess. I added /dev/psaux upstream long ago so I wouldn't have to change my XF86Config for 2.4 vs 2.6. In the meantime X can have two different input devices specified and won't fail if

Re: status of 2.6.7 ? (Was Re: Bug#256763: kernel-image-2.6.6-i386: not ready for sarge just yet)

2004-07-03 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 11:29:47PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: I don't quite like either of those. I'll try to take a look at the X Code and/or talk to the X folks on whether we could fix X to autoprobe for a corepointer. I would rather fix it in the installed XF86Config file, so we have

Re: status of 2.6.7 ? (Was Re: Bug#256763: kernel-image-2.6.6-i386: not ready for sarge just yet)

2004-07-03 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 11:36:02PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: Well, there's people dual-booting into both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels. I do that myself, although on macs we've used /dev/input/mice in 2.4 already anyway. Becaue you had a usb keyboard. Also, this is one of the reason i want to

Re: status of 2.6.7 ? (Was Re: Bug#256763: kernel-image-2.6.6-i386: not ready for sarge just yet)

2004-07-03 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 11:34:37PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Actually it's a (fake-)adb keyboard. But adb already uses the generic input layer in 2.4 like usb, so it's the same reason. s/keyboard/trackpad/ the former is true aswell, but completely irrelevant for this discussion ;-)

Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: r1347 - in trunk/debian: . patches scripts

2004-05-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 12:10:03PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote: +@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ + #ifdef _LP64 + # if defined(__sparcv9) + # define _MACH64_NAMEsparcv9 +-# elif defined(__ia64__) ++# elif defined(__ia64__) || defined(__amd64__) + # undef MACH64_NAME

Re: description of fix for #230204 for clean-room reimplmentation

2004-04-23 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 08:36:19PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: Around 16 o'clock on Apr 21, Branden Robinson wrote: In the source file xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/lnx_io.c: I'll note that the version of KDKBDREP_ioctl_ok in X.Org CVS does: static int

Re: licensing of commit to XFree86 CVS

2004-04-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 02:17:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: Also, if there is a C programmer present who is willing to perform such a clean-room rewrite should it come to that, please speak up. Please note that it's just the *change* that needs to be rewritten, not the entire files. In

Re: licensing of commit to XFree86 CVS

2004-04-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Okay, I looked over lnx_kbd.c, there's two thing that sprang to my mind: - the ifndef sparc and comment below is obviously wrong, the ioctl is implemented in Linux common code, specifically vt_ioctl.c. - fd 0 for the ioctl seems bogus. These ioctls are on the console device, and to my

Re: licensing of commit to XFree86 CVS

2004-04-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 04:11:49PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: Err, when pasting source code regarding an issue like this, where we need a clean-room reimplementation, please identify the origin of every line. The surrounding code is from XFree CVS when I last updated (about two weeks

Re: licensing of commit to XFree86 CVS

2004-04-21 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 11:02:12PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: So what about the following unutested patch: Sorry but i can't accept an untested patch. Would you mind to give it a shot at least? I don't think I have the time for a full blown X build, sorry.

Re: X Strike Force XFree86 SVN commit: rev 998 - branches/4.3.0/sid/debian

2004-01-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 06:04:01PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: [...] * When replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send a carbon copy (CC) to the original poster unless they explicitly request to be copied. What about proper Headers instead of longish

Bug#228665: xserver-xfree86: [mouse] SendCoreEvents + ServerLayout entry leads to doubled events

2004-01-23 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 10:00:24PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: That's not what I asked. :) I asked if /dev/psaux now also gives the events of all mice handled by the input layer, which handles most if not all input in 2.6 kernels. By default /dev/psaux doesn't exist in 2.6 kernels. I

Bug#168794: synaptics support in XFree86

2003-09-03 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 01:35:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: While 2) is probably not a practical concern with respect to an input driver, it's very important for things like the shared libraries in the XFree86 distribution. Hmm, what's the legal situation of having the driver loaded into

Bug#207481: xserver-xfree86: proposed debconf overhaul

2003-08-27 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:08:02PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: Package: xserver-xfree86 Severity: wishlist Okay, here is what I would change in xserver-xfree86.config. - xserver-xfree86/config/device/use_fbdev: check for existance of /proc/fb before asking the question about

Bug#207481: xserver-xfree86: proposed debconf overhaul

2003-08-27 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:08:02PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: Package: xserver-xfree86 Severity: wishlist Okay, here is what I would change in xserver-xfree86.config. - xserver-xfree86/config/device/use_fbdev: check for existance of /proc/fb before asking the question about

Bug#207481: xserver-xfree86: proposed debconf overhaul

2003-08-27 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:49:12PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: Moin Christoph! Christoph Hellwig schrieb am Wednesday, den 27. August 2003: On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:08:02PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote: Package: xserver-xfree86 Severity: wishlist Okay, here is what I would change

Bug#207481: xserver-xfree86: proposed debconf overhaul

2003-08-27 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 07:02:44PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: framebuffer for nvidia cards? (and the framebuffer driver is called rivafb, just btw..) which doesn't show up in /proc/fb but at least in the 2.6 driver the string nvidia won't appear in it either, just RIVA-*/GeForce*/etc..

Re: Running X server chroot?

2003-08-22 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 04:24:46PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: (Hmm, maybe you could use tmpfs for /tmp, and mount the same one in both the real root and the chroot? I've never tried this myself.) Doesn't help as tmpfs instances are compeltly separate. You could mount --bind the real /tmp