Bug#345645: xlibs-data: Prompted about unchanged conffile /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/dvorak

2007-02-02 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 02:06:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Feb 2, 2007 at 19:19:48 +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:48:02PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: > > > About 1 year ago, you reported a bug to the Debian BTS regarding a &

Bug#345645: xlibs-data: Prompted about unchanged conffile /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/dvorak

2007-02-02 Thread Hamish Moffatt
prompted about that file again. However I accepted dpkg's prompting last time - I can't verify that the problem has been solved based on this alone. Also that conffile seems to belong to xlibs instead of xlibs-data now. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL

Bug#345645: xlibs-data: Prompted about unchanged conffile /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/dvorak

2006-01-02 Thread Hamish Moffatt
Package: xlibs-data Version: 6.9.0.dfsg.1-1 Severity: normal When I upgraded from X 6.8.2.dfsg.1-11 to 6.9.0.dfsg.1-1 (specifically xlibs-data), I was prompted to accept conffile changes to the file /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/dvorak. I have not changed this file myself though. I have attached the old

Bug#237509: Followup for #237509

2004-03-16 Thread Hamish Moffatt
It's not as simple as "dpkg -r libxft-dev" because a heap of GNOME -dev libraries depend on that package directly or indirectly. Is it necessary to divert a file to a name used by a previous version of the package? Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#206900: xserver-xfree86: blew my config away

2003-08-27 Thread Hamish Moffatt
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-10 Followup-For: Bug #206900 The upgrade to 4.2.1-10 blew away my whole configuration really. Firstly it asked me a few additional questions (not the whole lot), then wrote the basic XF86Config-4 which of course didn't include my dual head setup etc. If I

Bug#206900: xserver-xfree86: blew my config away

2003-08-26 Thread Hamish Moffatt
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-10 Followup-For: Bug #206900 The upgrade to 4.2.1-10 blew away my whole configuration really. Firstly it asked me a few additional questions (not the whole lot), then wrote the basic XF86Config-4 which of course didn't include my dual head setup etc. If I

Re: XFree86 4.x Phase 2 is ready

2000-09-07 Thread Hamish Moffatt
onitors on a dual head Matrox G400 yet? I tried it (set up second screen and monitor entries and modified the screenlayout) and got a signal 11 from the server. I can provide the log file or debug info if anyone wants it. thanks, Hamish (please cc me on any replies as I am not on debian-x) -

Re: XFree86 4.x Phase 2 is ready

2000-09-07 Thread Hamish Moffatt
onitors on a dual head Matrox G400 yet? I tried it (set up second screen and monitor entries and modified the screenlayout) and got a signal 11 from the server. I can provide the log file or debug info if anyone wants it. thanks, Hamish (please cc me on any replies as I am not on debian-x) -