Bug#485465: battle for the brightness

2008-07-14 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
reassign 485465 linux-2.6 retitle 485465 thinkpad-acpi: races on brightness change on a R50e found 2.6.14-1 tag 485465 upstream forwarded 485465 [EMAIL PROTECTED] owner [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Synopsis: recently, brightness started acting up on R50e. Something is racing with the firmware. Users

Bug#485465: battle for the brightness

2008-06-25 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ah, this workaround finally worked: > # rmmod thinkpad-acpi; modprobe thinkpad-acpi brightness_mode=2 > > Fn End typed after this apparently last even thru reboots! Send me the output of the following commands, BY PRIVATE EMAIL (don't cc bugs.debian

Bug#485465: battle for the brightness

2008-06-25 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > HMH: be sure to add your warning to > linux-doc-2.6.25/Documentation/laptops/thinkpad-acpi.txt.gz There are warnings in there already, yes. > And it seems the severity of this bug should be elevated: something on > Debian is hijacking the brightness

Bug#485465: thinkpad-acpi EC/NVRAM brightness sync errors

2008-06-22 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:43:00 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > (I never tried kde, etc. so blaming it all on "xdm" for now, as that's > > > how I invoke X windows, and I don't want to get

Bug#485465: thinkpad-acpi EC/NVRAM brightness sync errors

2008-06-22 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Linux jidanni2 2.6.25-2-686 #1 SMP Thu Jun 12 16:26:30 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux > $ cat /proc/acpi/ibm/driver > driver: ThinkPad ACPI Extras > version: 0.19 These do have the locking to the brightness paths. > $ grep think /var/log

Bug#485465: thinkpad-acpi EC/NVRAM brightness sync errors

2008-06-19 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > H> 1. If it is *spamming* your logs with *lots* of EC/NVRAM out of sync > No, that message only happens when I tried > echo 0 > /sys/class/backlight/thinkpad_screen/brightness > to counteract xdm or whatever it is that turns my thinkpad to full > bri

Bug#485465: thinkpad-acpi EC/NVRAM brightness sync errors

2008-06-19 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Well, at least the thinkpad-acpi angle I can help with. I am the kernel maintainer for thinkpad-acpi. 1. If it is *spamming* your logs with *lots* of EC/NVRAM out of sync messages, you need a newer thinkpad-acpi. Depending on your kernel version, a backport will be available at ibm-acpi.sf.net.

Bug#448467: [ltp] Re: Bug#448467: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Thinkpad brightness keys don't work

2007-12-28 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote: > That's good, but there has to be a list somewhere since the kernel > backlight interface was so poorly designed. I don't care if it's in > the driver with an override list in xorg.conf or what, but it has to be > somewhere. As long as one can override

Bug#448467: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Thinkpad brightness keys don't work

2007-12-24 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote: > The Intel X driver now tries to talk to the kernel drivers directly (via > the /sys/class/backlight interface) starting with the thinkpad_screen > driver, followed by acpi_video1 and acpi_video0. Depending on how your > kernel is configured, this may w

Bug#448467: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Thinkpad brightness keys don't work

2007-12-15 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007, Marcus Better wrote: > Julien Cristau wrote: >> Looks like you built it against an old version of xserver-xorg-dev? > > Ok, I just tried with a new one, but the brightness is still broken. It > requires "native" or "combination" mode. I'd like to see X.org talking to the kern

Bug#448467: [ltp] Bug#448467: xserver-xorg-video-intel: Thinkpad brightness keys don't work

2007-10-29 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Marcus Better wrote: > The brightness control keys on my Thinkpad R60 stopped working in X > some time ago. I have probably upgraded both kernel and X.org since > then, and don't know exactly when it broke. The *60 and *61 series of ThinkPads require proper brightness support

Bug#350113: Bug#353702: hplip: hp-toolbox fails with below qt error:

2006-02-20 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
retitle 353702 hplib: hosed by libxft2/libfreetype6 braindamage severity 353702 grave tags 353702 confirmed etch block 353702 by 350113 thanks On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Fred Ringwald wrote: > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/hp-toolbox", line 41, in ? > import base.async_qt as

Re: XFree86 4.3 in unstable

2004-02-20 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Antony Gelberg wrote: > So I guess that it's dist-upgrade time, as this file must have changed > packages. Problem is, if I do an aptitude dist-upgrade, it wants to > install loads of bloat - including all of gnome? Why is this? Surely > nothing recommends all of gnome... C

Bug#183364: xserver-xfree86: xtt module has unresolved symbols

2003-03-04 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-6 Severity: normal Tags: sid Trying to start X results in: Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libspeedo.a:spencode.o": No symbols found Symbol FontFilePriorityRegisterRenderer from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libxtt.a is unresolved! Commenting

Bug#183364: xserver-xfree86: xtt module has unresolved symbols

2003-03-04 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: 4.2.1-6 Severity: normal Tags: sid Trying to start X results in: Skipping "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libspeedo.a:spencode.o": No symbols found Symbol FontFilePriorityRegisterRenderer from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libxtt.a is unresolved! Commenting

Re: PROPOSED: new package: xinit

2001-10-23 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Branden Robinson wrote: > Please address only the core of the proposal, which is: > > To create a new package "xinit" containing the programs xauth, xinit, > and startx, and their manual pages. > > Comments? Go for it. It will be a very big boon for people that need to imple

Re: PROPOSED: new package: xinit

2001-10-23 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Branden Robinson wrote: > Please address only the core of the proposal, which is: > > To create a new package "xinit" containing the programs xauth, xinit, > and startx, and their manual pages. > > Comments? Go for it. It will be a very big boon for people that need to impl