Hi,
Looks like it's time for great news :
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/11/171
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/nouveau/linux-2.6/commit/?id=6ee738610f41b59733f63718f0bdbcba7d3a3f12
(see the comment of the commit).
http://nouveau.freedesktop.org (head news)
So nouveau kms is going to go in .33.
Maybe
list.
Regards,
--
Henry-Nicolas Tourneur
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Le lundi 23 mars 2009 à 12:24 +0100, Michel Dänzer a écrit :
> On Sam, 2009-03-21 at 00:52 +0100, Henry-Nicolas Tourneur wrote:
> > > No, EXA has been backwards compatible since before xserver 1.1, so the
> > > drivers should continue working without a rebui
> No, EXA has been backwards compatible since before xserver 1.1, so the
> drivers should continue working without a rebuild (and also with one).
>
> > For the second solution, I definitely don't know enough either Xorg or
> > nouveau to know if that would be easy or not.
>
> It shouldn't be too
>
> There are other potential options, e.g.
>
> * Backport EXA changes required by nouveau to the lenny
> xserver-xorg-core. This might benefit other drivers as well.
> * Ship EXA bits required by nouveau as part of
> xserver-xorg-video-nouveau.
>
>
Of course that w
interested in that work ? Currently, I'm a programmer
and I just get a big picture of the way Xorg works, I did never hack on
it so I probably won't be some kind of leader for that work.
Thanks for reading the whole mail and considering that problem.
Kind regards,
Henry-Nicolas Tourn
Hi,
I'm now running the updated (ati -> radeon) driver. But I expected
something more performant (I'm using a 1680x1050 screen). While seeing
this [0], I expected to be able to play at Nexuiz for example, but I'v
got only 1FPS. So I would like to know if I missed something during my
configuration
7 matches
Mail list logo