libdrm-intel1 2.4.58-2 from jessie seems to have solved the issue. At
least get X to start!
Can I hassle someone from a backport I wonder? :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
htt
Hi there Julien,
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014, at 02:26 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Seems like you're using an old unsupported kernel.
3.16 from backports doesn't seem to make a difference.
http://s.natalian.org/2014-12-19/3-16.Xorg.0.log
https://github.com/Webconverger/webc/commits/kernelupgrade
How do
Hi there,
What's good general advice for dealing with xrandr issues for end users?
I had a look at http://x.debian.net/
The search link on https://lists.debian.org/debian-x/ is pretty useless
I tried to help a user here:
http://askubuntu.com/questions/123953/
And I ended up pointing him to Inte
I'll look into replicating your good work on Webconverger. :-)
Previously I bemoaned that my auto-building scripts weren't working.
http://git.webconverger.org/?p=build.git
Now they are working! See:
http://build.webconverger.com/
Tbh I am not sure why the xfonts-scalable problem went away. I'v
Package: xfonts-scalable
Version: 1:1.0.0-6
Severity: normal
This bug looks similar to #300990.
When I install xfonts-scalable without a terminal in a script I think inside
debian/xsfbs/xsfbs.sh when it calls message() reject_nondigits() could do more
by checking that columns are within a certain
I think I have a problem related to #300990
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-live-devel/2008-August/004063.html
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-live-devel/2008-August/004081.html
Have you every seen errors like:
Setting up xfonts-scalable (1:1.0.0-6) ...
/dev/
Currently debian live seems to use a 1:7.3+5 deprecated way of setting
the resolution:
http://git.debian.net/?p=live-initramfs.git;a=blob;f=scripts/live-bottom/21xvidemode;h=a11dc77a47f5d70f610b380a9ad5bcedd1c427db;hb=HEAD#l41
Use debconf from which dexconf generated the xorg.conf with the wanted
Running as the user 'webc' with groups: webc root kmem video
# ARGS="-logfile /tmp/runmeX.txt -config xorg.webc.conf"
# Error: xf86EnableIOPorts: failed to set IOPL for I/O (Operation not permitted)
# ARGS="-logfile /tmp/runmeX.txt"
# Error: The '-logfile' option can only be used by root.
ARGS="
On 2008-05-28T01:15+0200 Brice Goglin wrote:
> Try passing /etc/X11/xorg.webc.conf instead of a relative path. IIRC, we
> only allow alternative config files from /etc/X11.
Not sure about the argument ordering:
xinit /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc -- /usr/bin/X -conf /etc/X11/xorg.webc.conf :1
-auth /tmp
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Brice Goglin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think both startx and xserverrc should do the trick.
Tried passing -config over startx and it didn't work.
Now I'm a little confused between /usr/bin/Xorg and /usr/bin/X11/X.
Shouldn't they be the same?
> These manpage
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82852/855GM Integrated
Graphics Device (rev 02)
VMWARE and mplayer, my two favourite suspect apps lockup my TP X40.
--
http://webconverger.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 1:7.0.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #366001
I have the problem. I replaced /etc/X11/Xsession and it still doesn't
work.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh
I upgraded today to the new x.org packages in unstable and my bold fonts
are blurry.
http://flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=25895415&size=o
Otherwise it was a surprisingly smooth upgrade!!
Best wishes,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Package: xutils
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14
Severity: minor
Since 2002-09-28 (/usr/share/doc/coreutils/changelog.gz) mkdir from
coreutils supports the creation of directory hierarchies with a switch.
Therefore there is no need for mkdirhier, except to confuse people into
using it and depending on xu
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 01:08:10AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Sure? Mutt is a bad example; you need to install mutt-utf8 in order to
> work in an UTF-8 terminal. The version from the "mutt" package shows
Oops. Sorry, I didn't know such a package existed.
I've blogged about it here, in order t
Package: xterm
Version: 4.2.1-12.1
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #215828
http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/hendry/pictures/debian/xterm-utf8.png
It's not refreshing properly
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bilbo 2.4.22-1-k7 #1 Sat Sep 6 02
16 matches
Mail list logo