Bug#182632: xterm: bad upgrade

2003-02-27 Thread Lazarus Long
3484 Feb 19 03:33 /bin/readlink > 3) What's the output of "which readlink" in a shell with the same > environment as the one in which you upgraded xterm? # which readlink bash: which: command not found It looks like your shell script was calling a command that do

Bug#182632: xterm: bad upgrade

2003-02-27 Thread Lazarus Long
3484 Feb 19 03:33 /bin/readlink > 3) What's the output of "which readlink" in a shell with the same > environment as the one in which you upgraded xterm? # which readlink bash: which: command not found It looks like your shell script was calling a command that do

Bug#182633: xterm: MORE!

2003-02-26 Thread Lazarus Long
Package: xterm Severity: normal Screenfuls! Here is the tail end. Preparing to replace xfonts-75dpi 4.2.1-5 (using .../xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-6_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement xfonts-75dpi ... The readlink command was not found. Please install version 1.13.1 or later of the debianutils package.

Bug#182632: xterm: bad upgrade

2003-02-26 Thread Lazarus Long
Package: xterm Severity: normal No way to know which of the X packages is causing this, but xterm was part of the run. (All the X packages were install'ed together.) Preconfiguring packages ... The readlink command was not found. Please install version 1.13.1 or later of the debianutils package

Bug#182633: xterm: MORE!

2003-02-26 Thread Lazarus Long
Package: xterm Severity: normal Screenfuls! Here is the tail end. Preparing to replace xfonts-75dpi 4.2.1-5 (using .../xfonts-75dpi_4.2.1-6_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement xfonts-75dpi ... The readlink command was not found. Please install version 1.13.1 or later of the debianutils package.

Bug#182632: xterm: bad upgrade

2003-02-26 Thread Lazarus Long
Package: xterm Severity: normal No way to know which of the X packages is causing this, but xterm was part of the run. (All the X packages were install'ed together.) Preconfiguring packages ... The readlink command was not found. Please install version 1.13.1 or later of the debianutils package

Bug#163885: additional info -- [dri] r128.o kernel module version is 2.1.6 but version 2.2 or greater is needed.

2002-10-08 Thread Lazarus Long
nPGP) encrypt all mail whenever possible. Request the following Public Keys for Lazarus Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TypeBits/KeyIDFingerprint DSA KeyID: ElGamal: 2048g/CCB09D64 8270 4B79 CB1E 433B 6214 64EB 9D58 28A9 E8B1 27F4 pgpok5zS67o62.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#163885: xserver-xfree86: [dri] r128.o kernel module version is 2.1.6 but version 2.2 or greater is needed.

2002-10-08 Thread Lazarus Long
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: N/A Severity: important (Probably higher severity, due to hardware threat, but ... ?) (Invoked as user, with a plain "startx" command line) (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600) Release Date: 3 September 2002 If the server is older than

Bug#163885: additional info -- [dri] r128.o kernel module version is 2.1.6 but version 2.2 or greater is needed.

2002-10-08 Thread Lazarus Long
nPGP) encrypt all mail whenever possible. Request the following Public Keys for Lazarus Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TypeBits/KeyIDFingerprint DSA KeyID: ElGamal: 2048g/CCB09D64 8270 4B79 CB1E 433B 6214 64EB 9D58 28A9 E8B1 27F4 msg04054/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#163885: xserver-xfree86: [dri] r128.o kernel module version is 2.1.6 but version 2.2 or greater is needed.

2002-10-08 Thread Lazarus Long
Package: xserver-xfree86 Version: N/A Severity: important (Probably higher severity, due to hardware threat, but ... ?) (Invoked as user, with a plain "startx" command line) (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600) Release Date: 3 September 2002 If the server is older than