On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 20:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
...
> Otavio/-boot@: the thread started here:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/02/msg00286.html
...
It is OK for us.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 09:43, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> this is just for your information, no action is needed on your side.
...
Thanks by informing us.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile:
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 06:09, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Otavio Salvador
> → xresprobe. It got NMU'd recently, and from our (Julien's and my)
> point of view, it should be orphaned/removed, but debian-edu
> seemed to need it.
IMO it could be removed.
AFAIK
Luk Claes writes:
>> This means that we have to back it out again and the only question is if
>> we will do that for r0 or r1.
>
> I think it's best to delay that to r1. Can someone please provide a text
> for the release notes to describe the problem, TIA?
I also agree about let it for r1; it w
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's a tough choice. The ease of use of stgit sounds really nice to me, but
> I also love the transparency that having the patches in a location like
> debian/patches affords us. I'm not horribly worried about that though, but
> it is a real benefit. We
Thierry Reding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A very related issue is how to work with Debian-specific branches. Should we
> use a master branch which we keep the packaging files in and into which we
> merge/cherry-pick from the upstream branches as necessary? Or would it be
> better to have separa
Thierry Reding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Which exact version are you running? If you have an account on Alioth you can
> clone the git repository where I've just packaged the latest upstream version
> (0.3.4):
>
> $ git-clone ssh://alioth.debian.org/git/pkg-xorg/app/compiz.git
>
> Does a
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> commit b25f4dfbbd86e21146d1f9121c29d48e0c3a2678
> Author: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue Nov 21 21:52:28 2006 -0500
>
> Add quilt as a build-depend
I've been using git for sometime to maintain our specific patches of
debian packages
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 20:12 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > In order to get a backtrace from the segfault, you need to run gdb on an
>> > X server with de
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Otavio,
>
> the core file you sent is not really usable as Xorg catches the SIGSEGV,
> so the core file is only showing an abort.
> In order to get a backtrace from the segfault, you need to run gdb on an
> X server with debugging symbols enabled, wh
More info:
Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x84) [0x80c4354]
1: [0xe420]
2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libramdac.so(xf86SetCursor+0x10b) [0xafa7e6db]
3: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libramdac.so [0xafa7dd43]
4: /usr/bin/X(miPointerUpdate+0x167) [0x8112be7]
5: /usr/bin/X [0x8112cf9]
6: /usr/bin/X [
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 15:19:35 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>> Backtrace:
>> 0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x84) [0x80c4354]
>> 1: [0xe420]
>> 2: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libramdac.so(xf86SetCursor+0x10b) [0xa
Package: xserver-xorg-video-savage
Version: 1:2.1.2-1
Severity: important
KDM doesn't restart anymore when user logoff. I did a test and it
works fine wih 2.1.1-4 version so shouldn't be too difficult to
identify which change broke it.
If you wish any more testing, let me know.
,[ syslog err
Gustavo Noronha Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> That would be good to be add in cdbs. I think we might want to have it
>> more flexible to allow it to work for CDDs too but I liked it very
>> much :-D
>
> It does not look right to me, though.. what about buildds? And what
> about people forge
Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> e.g.
> build: test_stable patch build-stamp
> instead of
> build: patch build-stamp
That would be good to be add in cdbs. I think we might want to have it
more flexible to allow it to work for CDDs too but I liked it very
much :-D
--
O T A V
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a package ready at the moment. However, it only cleanly builds
> with the version of gcc in Sarge. I have been assured by upstream that
> a new release is forthcoming which fixes the build issues with gcc 4.x.
> Once it is out, the packa
Hello,
Today I upgraded a test server that runs LTSP for internal development
for our current sid release of modular X packages. The only issue that
we had is regarting to XFS upgrade since it doesn't use
/etc/X11/fs/config file anymore but should do it otherwise all changes
will be loose between
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does it from gluck?
Hey Christian,
Use the port :1817 in svn command ;-)
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5
Hello,
I had problem upgrading some machines that runs sid here. Looks like
x11-common needs to provide libxft-dev. I was upgrading to x11 -5
packages.
Thanks in advance,
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN:
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Um, neither does xserver-xorg.{config,postinst,templates}. So there's
>> not much point until those get fixed. I've been meaning to do it, but
>> never got around to it. (Don't count on me doing it, seriously.)
>
> I may do it on the purely xresprobe l
Hello,
I compiled current experimental package on PowerPC and its
MANIFEST.powerpc need the following patch:
--- debian/MANIFEST.powerpc 2005-11-25 18:36:35.660373000 -0200
+++ debian/MANIFEST.powerpc.new 2005-11-25 18:36:35.464373000 -0200
@@ -478 +477,0 @@
-usr/X11R6/bin/pclcomp
@@ -1233,0
Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 08:30:49PM +, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
>> It already prints ccedilla in non-qt aplications (xterm for example),
>
> This was added into Debian by #204148, and not incorporated upstream.
>
>> 'c is much more common combination (
David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 08:01:59AM -0700, Archive Administrator wrote:
>> xorg-x11_6.9.0.dfsg.1-0pre1+SVN_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
>> localhost
>
> Grr... my first upload got processed before I had time to upload the
> .orig.tar.gz. I re-up
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > This is quite a big problem when using low res (800x600), since a lot
>> > of windows are taller than 600 pixel, and many of them cannot be
>> > resized.
>
> The fix would be to make them resizeable to less thna 600 pixel, right ?
Sometimes isn't easy
Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've heard, that with xorg-6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 came new savage drivers.
>
> Could this bug have something to do with the new drivers? What is the easiest
> way to check this out?
Test with previous binary release?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O
X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Exclude some packages from the list of packages to be stripped. This is an
> ugly hack and I'll probably come up with something better later, but it
> works for now.
I think you can use dh_listpackages for it.
--
O T A V
David Martínez Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tend to think in testing as in the next stable, so maybe my feelings
> about
> stability are heading my way. Sorry if this clashes with the general
> interest.
Sure but it won't be release until november or december of 2006, probably.
>>>>> "david" == David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
david> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 08:10:42PM -0300, Otavio Salvador
david> wrote:
>> Since we'll review all changes made by Ubuntu makes more sense
>> to me do it while
> "daniel" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
daniel> I've been working upstream on the modular tree on my week
daniel> off, and the libs are done, and the server is well on the
daniel> way.
>> How far we currently are from modular tree? If it's not so
>> far, co
> "daniel" == Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
daniel> Another interesting question is what to do with version
daniel> numbers, since 6.8.2-1 will suddenly become ambiguous.
Well, one possible solution could be use 6.8.2.debian-1 as version.
>> 3) Make sure they build
> "david" == David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
david> I'd like to hammer out a roadmap for getting X.org packages
david> ready to go. Feedback from everyone is critical, of
david> course. Here's what I've got so far:
david> 1) Import Ubuntu packaging for X.org in to
|| On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:40:35 +0100
|| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) wrote:
db> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 06:56:17PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 02:05:04AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
>> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 08:09:07AM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote:
>> > > > Unfort
|| On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:58:57 +1100
|| Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ds> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:37:59PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository
Admin wrote:
>> Log:
>> Bring README document up to date with recent developments:
>> * Add URLs to xorg-x11, xresprobe, and xsftoolbox rep
Hello folks,
Today you received a wrong mail talking about a upload. Sorry for
that. I forgot to change the maintainer field before upload it to my
dak installation.
Really sorry :(
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
|| On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:34:41 -0500
|| Alan McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
am> I don't have to recapitulate what needs to be fixed -- the inadequacies
am> are apparent from the numbers 1, 2, and 3 above. I hope that attention
am> will be paid and efforts will be made to make a standard t
35 matches
Mail list logo
