[ Bcc debian-x and debian-gtk-gnome, discussion on -devel as the topic
crosses the boundaries of multiple teams ]
Hello,
it has been some time that GNOME 3.20 users have been unable to configure
their touchpad[1] because:
1/ xserver-xorg-input-synaptics cherry-picked an upstream commit[2]
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi,
On Sun, 01 Mar 2015, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I've enabled the kernel's qxl driver, but disabled by default so that
it doesn't conflict with wheezy's version of xserver-xorg-video-qxl.
Please install a modprobe configuration file with the
Hello dear maintainer(s),
the Debian LTS team would like to fix the security issues which are
currently open in the Squeeze version of libxfont:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-1802
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2015-1803
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010, Marcelo wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 09:23:34AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
That's not the case here with 0.44-1 and IIRC it was not the case with
0.43 either.
Maybe this is an useful datapoint: it used to be the case that
when triple-clicking a line
[ Same message sent in bcc to all remaining FTBFS with new source format ]
Hello,
the new source format 3.0 (quilt) is now allowed in testing/unstable and
having all packages buildable with the new format is a release goal
(http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/NewDebFormats).
Thus it would be
Hello,
since dpkg 1.15, update-alternatives is more strict and forbids lots of
silly operations that were previously accepted. Unfortunately improper
usage of u-a in the past could lead to cruft files that cause bugs on
upgrade. You have examples in #530633 and #531611.
| Setting up
On Thu, 28 May 2009, Mathias Brodala wrote:
Here’s the output:
File: „/var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/x-terminal-emulator“
That's not the good file. I asked for
/var/lib/dpkg/alternatives/x-terminal-emulator.1.gz.
(Hence the rest of the mail is useless, we know the x-terminal-emulator
to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
them back)
Cheers,
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/04/msg4.html
[2] the upcoming dpkg-dev 1.14.20 is more tolerant with patches, you can
grab it here if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael
it here if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-announce/2008/04/msg4.html
[2] the upcoming dpkg-dev 1.14.20 is more tolerant with patches, you can
grab it here if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-announce/2008/04/msg4.html
[2] the upcoming dpkg-dev 1.14.20 is more tolerant with patches, you can
grab it here if you want to try with that version:
http://people.debian.org/~hertzog/packages/dpkg-dev_1.14.20_all.deb
--
Raphael Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello,
I've been trying to recompile all packages as if we were using the 3.0 (quilt)
source package by default and investigating the related build failures. In
theory all quilt-based packages should _not_ fail but all the
xserver-xorg-* (and a few other X related package) do fail because
they
BTW, please CC me on reply, I'm not subscribed to the list.
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
For reference here are the X related packages where I saw those failures:
Of course I missed all the other that did not start by x:
libice_2:1.0.4-1_sid32-gcc43.buildlog
libxau_1:1.0.3
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007, Julien Cristau wrote:
Or we can change type-handling too. Apparently xorg only uses the fact
that type-handling provides not+sparc but it doesn't use the type-handling
program which is the real user of dpkg-architecture. Is that right?
Yes, that's correct.
Maybe
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 09:42:17PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007, Robert Millan wrote:
Please could you move dpkg-architecture from dpkg-dev to dpkg ? It seems
that
because of this, it turns out that having the xorg meta
On Mon, 01 May 2006, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:00:07PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hello people,
could you package the xset program as part of the X Strike Force ?
The package already exists in Ubuntu and is maintained by Daniel Stone.
It is used by the package
Hello people,
could you package the xset program as part of the X Strike Force ?
The package already exists in Ubuntu and is maintained by Daniel Stone.
It is used by the package acpi-support that I'd like to integrate in
Debian.
Cheers,
Raphaël.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:48:56PM -0500, Branden Robinson écrivait:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 07:05:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
[...]
That doesn't quite take care of getting them onto the first CD though.
And it's a bunch of special purpose code I would like to avoid
maintaining, if there
Le Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 11:56:14AM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait:
I was told they are scattered amoung the first three cd's.
Discover was already on the first CD. I don't know for the two other
packages. Anyway, they'll be on the first CD next time we build a CD set
(if Phil uses the latest CVS
Le Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:48:56PM -0500, Branden Robinson écrivait:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 07:05:10PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
[...]
That doesn't quite take care of getting them onto the first CD though.
And it's a bunch of special purpose code I would like to avoid
maintaining, if there
Le Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 11:56:14AM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait:
I was told they are scattered amoung the first three cd's.
Discover was already on the first CD. I don't know for the two other
packages. Anyway, they'll be on the first CD next time we build a CD set
(if Phil uses the latest CVS
26 matches
Mail list logo
