Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 12:10:10AM +, ROBERTOJIMENOCA wrote:
> > I saw this post on slashdot.org:
> > http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=121015&cid=10187780
> > This isn't funny.
> >
> > Do you have any roadmap to have x.org Debian packages?
> > How may
Felix Schulte wrote:
[snip]
> > Since the xprint-org package is anyway maintained outside the xfree86
> > tree AND considering that the whole purpose of these new X.org packages
> > is to split the tree as much as possible, I suggest that we can just
> > stop shipping the xprint code from x.org tre
Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 03, 2004 at 07:44:30AM +0200, Roland Mainz wrote:
> > > |>|>+ server are not licensed at all, and some of the fonts bear no
> > > |>|>+ copyright information whatsoever.
> > >
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
> |>| The SPSPARC2 model wasn't removed in the Xorg repository and is still
> |>| there in DESTDIR after a % make install # ...
> |>
> |>This file was not removed from our Xfree86 tree either, but
> |>SPSPARC2/fonts is now empty. I will correct the note in the CHANGESE
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Roland,
>
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> | X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote:
> |
> |>Author: fabbione
> |
> |>+* Import and adapt debian/scripts/prune-non-free:
&
X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin wrote:
>
> Author: fabbione
> +* Import and adapt debian/scripts/prune-non-free:
> + + update and review debian/copyright file.
> + (note xc/programs/Xserver/XpConfig/C/print/models/SPSPARC2/ disappeared
> from
> + upstream)
> +19
> +
The SPSPARC2 mode
Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 11:03:29PM -0400, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> > Package: xprt
> > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-5
> > Severity: important
> >
> > On startup, xprt immediately exits because it can't find the "fixed"
> > font. Nevertheless, the font is there:
> >
> > $ xl
Package: xfonts-base
Version: 4.2.1-16
RFE: Please update the encoding files and mkfontscale in Debian to
Xfree86 V4.4.0RC2.
There are lots of fixes in the encoding files, mainly for the Arabic
encodings (iso8859-6.8x and iso8859-6.16), Honkong locales and the new
sun-indic unicode mapping. mkfont
Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> When starting xprint, at boot time, i always get an error :
> "cat: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fs/config: No such file or directory"
>
> The error comes from the fact that i use xfs-xtt instead of xfs, so it
> install config in fs-xtt/config.
>
> The patch is simple and is attach
Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 05:42:04PM +0200, unai wrote:
> > Well, may it's better said X crashing...?
> >
> > Trying to open a powerpoint presentation file with
> > openoffice.org.1.0.1-5+woody crash X-Windows with a last line X-log:
> >
> > Fatal server error:
> > Beziers
Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 05:42:04PM +0200, unai wrote:
> > Well, may it's better said X crashing...?
> >
> > Trying to open a powerpoint presentation file with
> > openoffice.org.1.0.1-5+woody crash X-Windows with a last line X-log:
> >
> > Fatal server error:
> > Beziers
Drew Parsons wrote:
> > The name "xprint-xorg" may be slighly misleading since it is not based
> > on the plain X.org source; I am using a tree based on the X.org tarballs
> > with tons of my own patches to get the little monster working...
> >
> > What about "xprint-xprintorg" ? :)
> >
>
> OK, w
Drew Parsons wrote:
> > The name "xprint-xorg" may be slighly misleading since it is not based
> > on the plain X.org source; I am using a tree based on the X.org tarballs
> > with tons of my own patches to get the little monster working...
> >
> > What about "xprint-xprintorg" ? :)
> >
>
> OK,
Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > I would therefore like to take his standalone xprint code and package it
> > > for
> > > Debian. Any suggestions for naming? xprint or xprt-x11 or ...??
> >
> > I suggest xprint-xorg for the source package. For the binary package I
> > recommend a down-cased version o
Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > I would therefore like to take his standalone xprint code and package it for
> > > Debian. Any suggestions for naming? xprint or xprt-x11 or ...??
> >
> > I suggest xprint-xorg for the source package. For the binary package I
> > recommend a down-cased version of the
Drew Parsons wrote:
> The reason it's required, or at least useful, is that the mozilla default
> printing driver (postscript) is, to some degree, broken. Although pages are
> rendered correctly on screen, they are sometimes defective on the printed
> page. For instance, non-latin letters do not
Drew Parsons wrote:
> The reason it's required, or at least useful, is that the mozilla default
> printing driver (postscript) is, to some degree, broken. Although pages are
> rendered correctly on screen, they are sometimes defective on the printed
> page. For instance, non-latin letters do no
17 matches
Mail list logo
