Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd
Version: 1.2.1-2
Severity: important
Might warrant higher severity, since it prevents any graphical use of the
system.
In fact, my immediate reaction was that the installation had failed; console
based virtual
terminals (and switching to them) still work.
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 22:17 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
Ross Boylan wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd
Version: 1.2.1-2
Severity: important
Might warrant higher severity, since it prevents any graphical use of the
system.
No. Higher severity are for packages breaking
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 23:33 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
Ross Boylan wrote:
FYI I had also installed fglrx-driver and related packages (no 3D
stuff). These caused X to fail and print a backtrace. I removed them
and the open source drivers seemed to get control back.
Are you saying
I can now ssh in while the system is hung up, and I have attached logs captured
during
a recent hang up. Top showed Xorg using 100% CPU at the time.
When I killed xorg (signal 9) I got a fresh, working X. The shutdown I
requested was aborted.
The timing is a little surprising, since things
The problem occurs on a Dell Latitude D630 Laptop with a 1440x900 screen
resolution.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 17:36 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
Ross Boylan wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nv
Version: 1:2.1.3-1
Severity: normal
Severity is higher for me! I'm guessing that the driver is the
ultimate source of the problem; please reassign as appropriate.
X starts
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 10:19 +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
Ross Boylan wrote:
found 342817 1:2.1.3-1
retitle 342817 nv open source driver hangs system with GeForce 6600 PCIe
thanks
I thought I'd give this another try, since the proprietary drivers (as
packaged for Debian) are unavailable
found 342817 1:2.1.3-1
retitle 342817 nv open source driver hangs system with GeForce 6600 PCIe
thanks
I thought I'd give this another try, since the proprietary drivers (as
packaged for Debian) are unavailable for the 2.6.22 kernels. As before,
it hangs the system so badly that only a manual
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.2-5
Severity: normal
This bug is causing me big problems, but I guess it's peculiar to my
setup or use (perhaps few people use multiple KDE sessions). It
appeared perhaps a month or two ago.
I use KDE and often have several user sessions running in different
Unfortunately, after the last upgrade of xorg the proprietary driver
broke. So I tried the open-source one. It still doesn't work, locking
up the entire system :(
I'm using vesa for now.
This was with
ii xserver-xorg-video-nv1:2.0.2-1
I believe I backed out the proprietary
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 00:44 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
Ross Boylan wrote:
Unfortunately, after the last upgrade of xorg the proprietary driver
broke.
Look at the bottom of
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=420177
It could help.
Thanks so much for pointing that out
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6
Severity: minor
1.
The man page for xorg.conf, in the Files section, under FontPath, says
When this entry is not specified in the config file, the server falls
back to the compiled-in default font path, which contains the
following font path
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 08:17 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
reopen 342817 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 342817 xserver-xorg-video-nv
thank you
Ross Boylan wrote:
I request that this remain open.
Done, and changed the submitter's address to the one above.
Thank you.
I tried several
it is reasonable to expect me to do so.
Testing a new version is non-trivial, since I have to shut everything down to
do so.
Ross Boylan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.1.1-10
Severity: minor
The first line of the Xorg.1 man page says
Name Xorg - X11R6 X Server
I take it from this news item
xserver-xorg-core (1:1.0.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
* With the latest updates of Xorg, we have transitioned from X11R6 to
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 01:43:51PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 06:35 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
The need to conflict with guitar was already reported in #368161. A
conflict
with xext was added in 1:7.0.21. cbb isn't in stable and testing, so open a
new report
Package: x11-common
Version: 1:7.0.20
Severity: normal
Severity note: this problem blocks the upgrade of X11 and any other
packages that happen to be upgrade targets at the same time. It may
leave the user without a functioning X. So it may warrant higher
severity. On the other hand, the
I experienced what seems to be a slight variant of this problem, and
the one reported in 332367, when upgrading to xserver-xorg
6.8.2.dfsg.1-11. I believe this was an initial install of that
package (i.e., upgrade from xfree), and the first time I switched from
xfree.
I've excerpted parts of the
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 03:26:20PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:53:54AM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
Ross, I've not worked on RC3 mainly because there didn't seem to be a need
for it. I'll try and get RC3 in to the svn repo and uploaded to
experimental ASAP so you
Ross, I've not worked on RC3 mainly because there didn't seem to be a need
for it. I'll try and get RC3 in to the svn repo and uploaded to
experimental ASAP so you can test whether or not it fixes your issue.
- David Nusinow
Thanks. Will it be safe to install the debs from experimental, or
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 10:43:20PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
Having managed to get my hard disk detected, I'm on to the next
problem. When I do a regular boot, my system appears dead:
The screen is black.
There is no response to any keyboard or mouse activity, including
ctl-alt-del, ctl-alt
to you.
So, developers/packagers, I don't know quite how you do it, but thanks
for all your work.
Ross Boylan
I'm happy to report this problem has gone away with the upgrade to 4.3.
Perhaps it's time to close this bug?
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 23:38, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 06:18:22PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
I notice this bug is tagged moreinfo, unreproducible, but also
I notice this bug is tagged moreinfo, unreproducible, but also upstream.
In reviewing this bug, and the ones it is merged with, I don't see where
the moreinfo and unreproducible came from. Unfortunately, it continues
to be very reproducible for me. I've also received no requests for more
info
I just apt-get source xterm, which pulled in 4.2.1-15. After a look
at the documents, I tried
debian/rules checksource
But this ran into trouble at
Applying patch debian/patches/001a_damn_cpp_3.3_to_hell.diff...done.
Applying patch debian/patches/001b_m68k_haslinuxinput_too.diff...dry run
Here are some of the errors I referred to in my original report:
/bin/sh ../../../libtool --silent --mode=link --tag=CXX g++ -Wnon-virtual-dtor
-Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -ansi
-D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts
Package: xrender
Severity: minor
The changelog entry for xrender (0.8.3-5) includes the sentence
This prevents libxrender1 from being removed because.
I think you left out the reason.
By the way, while trying to build KDE, libtool gave me some warnings
about libxrender (sorry, the details are
This is just to confirm that it works for me too, even with the
slightly earlier 4.2.1-12.1 version.
I can't really tell what the problem or fix was, but I guess upstream
took care of it.
Thanks to all.
Package: xfonts-scalable
Version: 4.2.1-11
Severity: important
Justification: fails to install
This is almost certainly the same problem as reported in 143476 and
16457 for this package and 117225 for xbase-clients on xftcache.
However, since the line number of the failure is a bit different, and
Package: xfonts-scalable
Version: 4.2.1-11
Severity: important
Justification: fails to install
This is almost certainly the same problem as reported in 143476 and
16457 for this package and 117225 for xbase-clients on xftcache.
However, since the line number of the failure is a bit different, and
I've been trying to understand how fonts work on Debian over the last few days, and
thought it might be useful
to share some of the references that look especially useful and some things I think
I've found out. I was
inspired particularly by some problems with fonts under KDE, and I haven't
I've been trying to understand how fonts work on Debian over the last few days,
and thought it might be useful
to share some of the references that look especially useful and some things I
think I've found out. I was
inspired particularly by some problems with fonts under KDE, and I haven't
Is there any chance that freetype should be working in woody? I just
did a dist-upgrade (with a lot of rough spots) and am not having much
luck with it or other proportional fonts. My test case is xman, since
I noticed it got much better when I installed the true-type font
server in olden days
Is there any chance that freetype should be working in woody? I just
did a dist-upgrade (with a lot of rough spots) and am not having much
luck with it or other proportional fonts. My test case is xman, since
I noticed it got much better when I installed the true-type font
server in olden days
34 matches
Mail list logo
