On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:57:12AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> tags 349318 + fixed-upstream
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:44:28AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > So, I suppose most of you have read
> > <http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00016.html>
inking, but -L/usr/X11R6/lib is not...
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
diff -u xft-2.1.7/debian/chan
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
:c
:i
This is the error reort you asked for Steve Lagasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have to bare with me Linux is new for me bug tracking tag 349135
-- Package-specific info:
Contents of
reassign 349135 xserver-xfree86 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1
severity 349135 important
tags 349135 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 05:56:13PM +1000, Steve Williams wrote:
> Package: xserver-common
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1
> Severity: critical
> F
Package: xserver-common
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1
Severity: critical
File: Xserver
Justification: breaks unrelated software
the problem I encountered is stoping the xwindows implementation from starting
aand so makes this setup of Linux not to useful for me. I have not run Linux
for about 1
That would make udev broken.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 11:30:38AM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 12:11:38AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On IRC request from Steve, attached is a list of packages, sorted by
> > maintainer, that still build-depend on xlibs-dev. It's rather large, but
can track how things
> progress. Thanks!
I don't see anything that should block letting this in next week, at least
if libxrender turns out to be a shlibs change and not an soname change.
Let's let the rest of the release team comment as well, though.
--
Steve Langasek
.a, and possibly adjust the GLcore
> one if there's also a .so available. Add a Conflicts on older versions
> of nvidia-glx from xserver-xorg. Which is still messy, but there you
> go.
Yes, that's a perfectly reasonable solution AFAICT.
--
Steve Langasek Gi
t;= 6.8.1-0.2)
Replaces: xserver-xorg (<= 6.8.1-0.2)
should almost certainly be a Replaces *without* a Conflicts. The Conflicts
is only warranted if replacing the corresponding files from xserver-xorg
causes xserver-xorg to not work correctly in some way.
--
Steve Langasek
e86-common and
x11-common own the /etc/X11/rgb.txt conffile. So, if the user purged
xfree86-common (which he shouldn't have done)... poof.
- --
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and
answered "No".
Since I was upgrading, even once was too many, but three times seems
excessive...perhaps you need a "Really definitely no, please don't ask
again!" choice. :-)
Steve
PS In the interest of brevity, I deleted the xorg.conf and xserver log
file from this report
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 08:29:22AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2005-09-25 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, you would only need to ship the *md5sum* of the old xfree86-common
> > conffile with the x11-common package, for comparison with the currently
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 05:48:51PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 07:38:11PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Package: x11-common
> > Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2
> > Severity: important
> > When installing x11-common on my existing sid system that
eady used in production in Ubuntu, and secondly that having
xserver-xorg available in testing doesn't mean users must immediately
migrate to it since xserver-xfree86 is still around (at least for a little
while). I don't think it's appropriate to hold xorg out of testing due to
non-specific bugs.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
As reported on debian-alpha, trying to run xorg-xserver on alpha outputs
a large number of
Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 28
messages and then segfaults. Once again, the toolchain has moved the
bar for
Followup:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 01:49:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 11:29:31PM -0400, jacob wrote:
> > Greetings all.
> > Today with a day of mixed blessings. I was over-joyed to see X.org
> > finally make into the Alpha/Sid. However, no amou
On a second machine, I received similar conffile dialogs for
/etc/X11/xkb/keymap/sun/* when installing xlibs.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ing up our minds.
> Maybe
> they have a preferred way to go.
As we discussed on IRC, I think the second option is reasonable.
And FWIW, yes, debian-release@lists.debian.org is the address to use for
contacting the release team.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: xlibs-dev
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2
Severity: serious
The current version of xlibs-dev is not fully backwards-compatible with
previous versions built from xfree86, because in the xorg tree a number of
packages have been split out of the xlibs-static-dev package, e.g.,
libxxf86vm-dev. Packa
Package: x11-common
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-2
Severity: important
When installing x11-common on my existing sid system that had the latest
xfree86-common installed, I was presented with conffile prompts for
/etc/X11/Xsession and /etc/X11/Xsession.options even though I have never
edited them. This i
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:00:12PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 03:09:18AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Also, for those who aren't aware, the new xorg packages now in
> > unstable are also implicated in the C++ transition, because libGLU is
bugs.debian.org as well.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.0 in etch, so it'd be great if this could be applied and uploaded to
unstable post haste so that we can move forward with the ABI transition for
all the packages above xlibmesa-glu in the tree.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Index: debian/xlibmesa-
mber
> to ask the RMs to force -14 into sarge.
As previously noted on IRC, please upload -14 directly as soon as you have
a chance to do so.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[...]
if has_multiplexed_mouse; then
Well, has_multiplexed_mouse returns 0 if the configured mouse *is* USB
(etc), so the logic is exactly reversed.
Patch attached. Sorry for not catching this on its way through, guys.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Index: debia
; /usr/lib/i686/mmx/cmov/libGL.so.1
This file does not come from xlibmesa-gl; it comes from either mesag3 or
from libgl1-mesa-glide3. Please indicate the versions of those packages
that you have installed on your system.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
bug does not affect comprehension of the sentence or mistranslate
the original, I consider this a minor bug, but it would be nice if the fix
could be included in -14.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--- xfree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1/debian/po/es.po.orig 2005-05-17 03:06:25.410077665
ng a transition path for the file, and the
impending freeze); so I don't really think this is release-critical, and
I also don't think it's a policy violation, strictly speaking.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: X11
Dear Debian,
please see attached log for my Cellink 15" L5AK5 monitor.
I'd be grateful for any feedback on this monitor type.
--
--
Thanks
Steve
capam:/var/log# cat XFree86.0.log | more
This is a pre-release version of XFree86, and is not supported in any
way. Bugs may b
f the xfree86-common
package's breakage.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reassign 290990 xserver-xfree86
thanks
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 08:24:36PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> forwarded 290990 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164512
> thanks
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Tue, Jan 18, 2005:
> > [ran fine until interrupted, wi
dware
combinations will be free of problems. I imagine the X maintainers will
want to ask you more specifics about exactly what hardware you are running.
It seems likely that this is related to bug #283001, but I'll let the X
maintainers make the determination whether to merge the two bugs.
Thanks,
nnot write,
Steve
3708818113151155331--
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 02:06:16AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 12:06:36PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > environment variables, at least, are trivial to accomplish using the
> > pam_env module. Properly setting a umask would call for something else
&g
refer to the corresponding PAM configuration files instead.
> > Maybe that's the direction we should head?
> I don't think everything in /etc/login.defs is provided by PAM yet,
> although I'm willing to be corrected on this. I agree that's the right
> place for programs l
e log and my config for XF86.
Steve Etzell
XFree86.0.log
Description: Binary data
XF86Config-4
Description: Binary data
lving
dependencies.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
id you know #241185? My system failed to
> boot at the time to detect SCSI controller.
Yes, but a) this bug first showed up in 2.4.21, and b) it was
Debian-specific.
In any case, the bug has been resolved. Could you upgrade to a current
2.4.27 kernel package and verify whether you still e
not heard of any problems with alpha that would require
continued use of a 2.2.25 kernel; but do the glibc packages even support
2.2 anymore on most archs?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
em to work.
(I am only pointing out these as I have no idea what the dri library
does !)
--
Steve
> Hi folks,
>
> I have the following in xserver-xfree86.config:
>
> # server modules to load
> # XXX: damnit, explicitly loading the dri module is broken for sunffb
> us
n't go in today, I expect that will be
> because of the new sppc upload, making it a transitive problem.
Yes, the sppc upload was impeccably timed. Rather than letting more
packages build up behind xfree86 in the queue for the next 10 days (X is
at the base of 3 of the 4 top bloc
run some applications, so I installed SuSE Linux on this box. But is it
not possible to find out which packages were on the ftp at 07. March 2004? I´m
really sorry that i forgot to attach this information.
With kind regards
Steve
r-dev 0.8.3-5
ii libxrender10.8.3-5
Sorry for my bad english :-) and, with kind regards
Steve
coffee and it maybe they light
up this time.
Versions:
ii xlibs 4.2.1-12.1
ii xlibs-dev 4.2.1-12.1
ii xlibs-pic 4.2.1-12.1
ii xfree86-common 4.2.1-12.1
ii libxrender-dev 0.8.3-5
ii libxrender10.8.3-5
Sorry for my bad english :-) and, with kind regards
Steve
> Particularly valuable in this particular case would probably be someone
> who is a known quantity to SGI.
I'm aware of one developer who is currently an SGI employee; I'll check
with him to see what approach he recommends.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgphq3bBU1B1w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
under DFSG-compatible terms, please let me know.
The script is my work and you may release it under the GPL.
Steve.
against Debian
kernels.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux broken 2.4.21-1-k7-smp #2 SMP Mon Jun 16 22:26:39 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
-- no debconf information
--
Steve
* moshez
against Debian
kernels.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux broken 2.4.21-1-k7-smp #2 SMP Mon Jun 16 22:26:39 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
-- no debconf information
--
Steve
* moshez
Should this bug be downgraded / reassigned back to licq, or does
fixed-in-experimental mean it will soon be fixed-in-testing?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgpIGbO1aVs5d.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Should this bug be downgraded / reassigned back to licq, or does
fixed-in-experimental mean it will soon be fixed-in-testing?
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
3 echo "$THIS_PACKAGE" >> "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER"
264 fi
PATCH
-
I suggest you add the line
mkdir -p `dirname $XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER`
between lines 262 & 263
Steve
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux guwush
3 echo "$THIS_PACKAGE" >> "$XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER"
264 fi
PATCH
-
I suggest you add the line
mkdir -p `dirname $XWRAPPER_CONFIG_ROSTER`
between lines 262 & 263
Steve
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux guwush
-- debconf information:
xfree86-common/experimental_packages:
--
Steve
* vorlon installs ntop to look at the copyright file, and finds that he
can't purge it because of a broken maintainer script. Heh.
vorlon: this is your punishmen
-- debconf information:
xfree86-common/experimental_packages:
--
Steve
* vorlon installs ntop to look at the copyright file, and finds that he
can't purge it because of a broken maintainer script. Heh.
vorlon: this is your punishmen
When I resubmitted the bug I forget to attach the appropriate files.
Here they are.
/**
* .88:.Steve Warner *
* 8.888. System Administrator *
* .88 Web Administrator
email
any problems. If there is a known workaround or fix please let me know.
/**
* .88:.Steve Warner *
* 8.888. System Administrator *
* .88 Web Adm
When I resubmitted the bug I forget to attach the appropriate files.
Here they are.
/**
* .88:.Steve Warner *
* 8.888. System Administrator *
* .88 Web Administrator
email
any problems. If there is a known workaround or fix please let me know.
/**
* .88:.Steve Warner *
* 8.888. System Administrator *
* .88 Web Adm
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
With all of the 4.2 versions of this package, my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4
file has been changed to include silly options that I made when I
initially set up the box. I don't know where it's getting these old
options from. I specif
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
With all of the 4.2 versions of this package, my /etc/X11/XF86Config-4
file has been changed to include silly options that I made when I
initially set up the box. I don't know where it's getting these old
options from. I specif
I to pick up at a later date.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Template: xserver-xfree86/autodetect_video_card
Type: boolean
Default: true
Description: Attempt to autodetect video hardware?
Accept this option if you would like to attempt to autodetect the recommended
X server and driver modul
I to pick up at a later date.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Template: xserver-xfree86/autodetect_video_card
Type: boolean
Default: true
Description: Attempt to autodetect video hardware?
Accept this option if you would like to attempt to autodetect the recommended
X server and driver modul
I upgraded from whatever is in Debian unstable to 4.2.0pre1v1.
Everything went smoothly, no problems. I can finally switch from the X
console to another virtual console and back without crashing the server
(Trident Cyberblade). Very nice.
Thanks,
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that
I upgraded from whatever is in Debian unstable to 4.2.0pre1v1.
Everything went smoothly, no problems. I can finally switch from the X
console to another virtual console and back without crashing the server
(Trident Cyberblade). Very nice.
Thanks,
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 10:45:40AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 12:20:25PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> That's the really annoying thing about this, though - the binaries in
>> question have man pages that worked just fine with the p
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 10:45:40AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 12:20:25PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> That's the really annoying thing about this, though - the binaries in
>> question have man pages that worked just fine with the p
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 10:57:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 12:51:56AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>[...]
>> This is really annoying - nas built just fine previously, but it looks
>> like there has been a significant change to the output of imake,
On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 10:57:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 12:51:56AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>[...]
>> This is really annoying - nas built just fine previously, but it looks
>> like there has been a significant change to the output of imak
xlibs-dev for this or just work
around the problem...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rpg-soc.ucam.org/curs/>CURS home page
"Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky, +--
"Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I..." |Finger for PGP key
xlibs-dev for this or just work
around the problem...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.rpg-soc.ucam.org/curs/>CURS home page
"Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky, +--
"Tongue-tied &
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:49:11PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 05:02:04PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>>Hmmm. None of the symbols mentioned show up in ytalk at all; this
>>would seem to be a bug somewhere else, at a guess the X libs. Does
>&g
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:49:11PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 05:02:04PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>>Hmmm. None of the symbols mentioned show up in ytalk at all; this
>>would seem to be a bug somewhere else, at a guess the X libs. Does
>&g
subscribed.
--
Steve
"I'm a sysadmin because I couldn't beat a blind monkey in a coding contest."
--Me
pgp1qbdxrFb9y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
subscribed.
--
Steve
"I'm a sysadmin because I couldn't beat a blind monkey in a coding contest."
--Me
PGP signature
;t know if
this helps fix the bug in mesag3-glide2... but it suggests that a workaround
may be to use xlibmesa3 instead of mesag3. (Isn't the integrated XFree4 code
the preferred GL driver anyway?)
HTH,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
> Both problems went away when I changed the colour depth
> from 24bpp to 16bpp.
>
> Might be worth a try ?
I'm only using 16bpp. I can't remember if I tried any other depth or not.
I'll give it a shot next time I look at it (may be a few days).
> Regards,
> P
>
> Both problems went away when I changed the colour depth
> from 24bpp to 16bpp.
>
> Might be worth a try ?
I'm only using 16bpp. I can't remember if I tried any other depth or not.
I'll give it a shot next time I look at it (may be a few days).
> Regards,
> P
o reboot. Unfortunately, I'm having problems
running gdb on X remotely and am not making much progress on this.
Yes, the problem does seem to be in the mode register save or restore
somewhere and definitely upstream.
>
> Has this been mentioned as a problem upstream?
Or should we
o reboot. Unfortunately, I'm having problems
running gdb on X remotely and am not making much progress on this.
Yes, the problem does seem to be in the mode register save or restore
somewhere and definitely upstream.
>
> Has this been mentioned as a problem upstream?
Or should we
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 12:17:50AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 08:18:00PM -0700, Steve Bowman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 12:56:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > > Please, please, please focus your efforts on XFree86 4.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 12:17:50AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 08:18:00PM -0700, Steve Bowman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 12:56:21AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > > Please, please, please focus your efforts on XFree86 4.
going to stick around for some
cards no longer supported by the 4.x crop of drivers. NV1, for example.
Steve
--
Steve Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (preferred)
Buckeye, AZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.goodnet.com/~sbowman/>
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd <http://www.debian.org>
going to stick around for some
cards no longer supported by the 4.x crop of drivers. NV1, for example.
Steve
--
Steve Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (preferred)
Buckeye, AZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.goodnet.com/~sbowman/>
Pow
401 - 484 of 484 matches
Mail list logo
