On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 00:55 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:35:07 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> > How can I overcome the problem on my system, since i have an
> > fglrx-driver that does work?
> >
> rename the fglrx package, or don&
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 11:40 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> severity 424975 wishlist
> kthxbye
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 01:42:52 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> > The recently added conflict with fglrx-driver shouldn't be there.
> > I have a patched fglr
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-4
Severity: important
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
The recently added conflict with fglrx-driver shouldn't be there.
I have a patched fglrx-driver, and it works fine, and there is no way with an
unversioned and unqualified c
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A workaround with the side-effect that anyone with a FontPath of
> /usr/lib/X11/fonts/foo will be unable to see those fonts in
> /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/foo, though.
Yes. It's not a perfect workaround, merely a solution to that one
problem, in one ca
I note that X11R7 has been released. It would be so nifty if this
could be in etch.
Unless I hear back shortly, I'll open a wishlist bug for it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug 295175 is tagged pending; can you give me some idea of the time
frame I should expect before the fix is in the archive? Also, how
long do the autobuilds of xfree86 take normally to get through the
process on the buildds (if you happen to know)?
I ask because a package of mine (gnucash) is st
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What the fuck is going on! When in this insane world did Branden become
> the polite well mannered one, and I become the asshole!
Uh oh, if we elect Branden DPL, is he going to switch back?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I share your hope, but I cannot help noticing that the number of
> available scalable fonts is currently the greatest weakness of the
> Free Software and Open Source community (communities?).
However, adding these fonts did nothing to help the prob
Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I share your hope, but I cannot help noticing that the number of
> available scalable fonts is currently the greatest weakness of the
> Free Software and Open Source community (communities?).
However, adding these fonts did nothing to help the pro
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Whether app-defaults files can be regarded as configuration files or not is
> an arbitrary decision. By moving them to /etc/X11 in the default
> configuration, XFree86 has indicated their opinion. I see no reason to
> differ with them.
In my soon-t
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Whether app-defaults files can be regarded as configuration files or not is
> an arbitrary decision. By moving them to /etc/X11 in the default
> configuration, XFree86 has indicated their opinion. I see no reason to
> differ with them.
In my soon-
11 matches
Mail list logo
