Is something wrong with the patch included in #513928?
Is there anything I could do to help?
Thanks,
wt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
+Brice Goglin
I am not sure if this message actually got onto the debian-x mailing
list or not.
wt
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Warren Turkal w...@penguintechs.org wrote:
I noticed that the 1.2.4 version of the radeonhd driver is stuck in
experimental since early February
I noticed that the 1.2.4 version of the radeonhd driver is stuck in
experimental since early February. Is there anything I can do to help
get it into sid?
Thanks,
wt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 10/17/07, Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because it's not clearly in the domain of Xorg. x11-input makes sense,
but then again, it's largely a system decision. OTOH, XKB can be used
in the console, not just in X (hence why it's namespaced input.xkb and
not input.x11.xkb or so), so
On 10/17/07, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think including it in our package until HAL gets it is probably the right
move. More package churn on the server is probably going to be a fact of
life for a while anyway. The reason I haven't really put much work in to
input hotplug is
On 10/17/07, David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you could open that as another bug, that'd be much preferrable to
discussing it in this one.
Fair enough.
wt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.4-3
Severity: important
The file xorg-server-1.4/config/x11-input.fdi should be copied to
/etc/hal/fdi/policy/. This will allow hotplug input to work as well as
possible with the current version of xorg.
wt
-- Package-specific info:
Contents of
On second thought, putting the file in /usr/share/hal/fdi/policy might
be more appropriate. Please see my patch below.
wt
--- rules 2007-10-15 22:27:29.0 -0700
+++ rules.new 2007-10-15 23:39:28.0 -0700
@@ -123,6 +123,8 @@
# # something funny going on with Xprinters,
On 10/16/07, Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK the reason it isn't installed by upstream is that it's just a stop
gap until HAL ships its own file(s) for this. Shipping it in X packages
now would go against this and might cause packaging churn down the road.
Why would hal ship a
://necrotic.deadbeast.net/var/lib/svn/xfree86/people/wt/4.4.0).
Please do not use the debian packaging files I have for 4.4, just copy the
ones from the latest 4.3 trunk.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
, they would have their advertising without changing the
licenses or impacting Xfree developers.
Cheers
(I really hope not to start a flame war ...)
They don't want people to be able to legally remove the advertisement.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
at for submitting this patch upstream. They all said that the
problem was fixed already.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Branden Robinson wrote:
Making patches smaller/more sane/etc. is good and valuable work, and I
appreciate your efforts to make the 4.4 cycle less user-angering than
4.3's has been. However, we must take care not to throw out the baby with
the bathwater. :)
I heard that.
wt
--
Warren
, ...) work ?
What kind of video card do you use, and at which color depth ?
Frank
I also have this happen after a period of time in foobillard.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
?
I disagree with your premise and your conclusion.
That is probably more sane than me :-). I was trying to make patches smaller
for the 4.4 cycle. Thanks for discussing this with me.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Benjamin Sher wrote:
I forgot to add that the glx module is indeed enabled in XF86Config-4.
Here is the relevant output:
*snip*
If you are using Nvidia's driver, the glx module should not be loaded.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:54:49AM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
Patch 004 is overkill for making the manpages appears with the right
names in the right places.
I need you to spend more time justifying this statement, please.
Short Description:
Okay, if you used
What is the version of svn running on necrotic? Is there any chance of
getting it bumped to a version that supports the blame command?
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
Hello,
I am loading an xmodmap using
*snip*
I don't think debian X packages respect .Xmodmap files by default. Please
see the Debian X Faq. I think there is something in there about this issue.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
MiscManSuffix 7x
+# define MiscManDir$(MANSOURCEPATH)7
+
# define DebianMaintainer YES
# ifdef DebianMaintainer
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
and config file and if applicable preferably
even a backtrace from xserver-xfree86-dbg.
Would a server crash leave the mouse cursor working. BTW, I use hardware
cursors.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
up the method for doing this
in the Linux Gazette a while back, actually.
I mean the following. When X crashes, would a hardware mouse cursor still
work? I am under the impression that the machine is locked, not that X has
crashed because my mouse continues to move after locking.
wt
--
Warren
Does the reporter of this bug have a Radeon or some type. Flightgear locks
my computer after some time, and I have a Radeon. The last version of
Flightgear locked my computer up on start.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
$(MANSOURCEPATH)7
+
# define DebianMaintainer YES
- *
- *
- */
# ifdef DebianMaintainer
# ifndef XFree86CustomVersion
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
I just wanted to write to let you know that this version of the patch works
as expected and can replace the imake manpage overhaul (004) and the debian
configuration change (900). I have just made it the 900 patch with the same
name.
wt
Warren Turkal wrote:
Here it is. Again, this replaces 900
Warren Turkal wrote:
I think that patch 004 is overkill. I think the XFree86 build system
already has the functionality we are looking for there. I have included a
patch that should replace 900 and 004.
*snip*
In regard to this, I would also like to submit the following patch to
XFree86
- *
- *
- */
# ifdef DebianMaintainer
# ifndef XFree86CustomVersion
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
+
+# define MiscManSuffix 7x
+# define MiscManDirManSourcePath
+
# define DebianMaintainer YES
- *
- *
- */
# ifdef DebianMaintainer
# ifndef XFree86CustomVersion
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
to
reopen
report.
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to
reopen
report.
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Sep 2003 20:03:29 -0500
Newsgroup: gmane.comp.xfree86.devel
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 06:30:21PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
Here is a patch from the Debian packages that fixes certain build configs.
$Id: 017_fix_Xlib_depend_target.diff 586 2003-09-25 19:31:35Z branden $
This patch by Ishikawa
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:55:47PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:08:23AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
Built successfully sans #017.
Sigh, ignore this message, as I'm way too tired. #017 was included, and I
really need to go to bed now.
I tried
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:55:47PM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:08:23AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
Built successfully sans #017.
Sigh, ignore this message, as I'm way too tired. #017 was included, and I
really need to go to bed now.
I tried
On Monday 22 September 2003 05:54 am, Michel Dnzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 04:11, Warren Turkal wrote:
In the meantime, David Dawes convinced me that this isn't very useful
for the traditional X libraries because pkg-config support for them
can't be relied upon anyway.
The only reason
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:40:37PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 13:18, Warren Turkal wrote:
On Monday 22 September 2003 05:54 am, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 04:11, Warren Turkal wrote:
In the meantime, David Dawes convinced me
are based on heuristics instead of actual data supplied by
these .pc files.
As David pointed out, shipping them now won't magically make them appear
in all X11 installtions past and present, so they can't be relied upon.
This is not a reason not to support them in the future.
wt
--
Warren
Is anyone opposed to removing patch 017? It is not needed in XF 4.3 as there
is already a depend:: target in the Imakefile in xc/lib/X11. This will
bring that Imakefile in sync with upstream, I believe.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Monday 22 September 2003 05:54 am, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 04:11, Warren Turkal wrote:
In the meantime, David Dawes convinced me that this isn't very useful
for the traditional X libraries because pkg-config support for them
can't be relied upon anyway.
The only reason
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:40:37PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 13:18, Warren Turkal wrote:
On Monday 22 September 2003 05:54 am, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 04:11, Warren Turkal wrote:
In the meantime, David Dawes convinced me
are based on heuristics instead of actual data supplied by
these .pc files.
As David pointed out, shipping them now won't magically make them appear
in all X11 installtions past and present, so they can't be relied upon.
This is not a reason not to support them in the future.
wt
--
Warren
Is anyone opposed to removing patch 017? It is not needed in XF 4.3 as there
is already a depend:: target in the Imakefile in xc/lib/X11. This will
bring that Imakefile in sync with upstream, I believe.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 01:36:38PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
Author: wt
Date: 2003-09-19 13:36:17 -0500 (Fri, 19 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 555
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/017_x11_pkg_config_enable.diff
Removed:
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:17:40PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 20:36, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
Log:
Enabling pkg-config for libX11. The main artifact is that
there is now a file called /usr/lib/pkgconfig/X11.pc.
Shouldn't we wait
Is there a sorting order to the MANIFESTS, or can I just add whatever
whereever? I am going to make the changes for the other archs for the
pkg-config stuff.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there any reason that I should not submit the patches for building
external Xcursor, Xft, and Xrender upstream?
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 01:36:38PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
Author: wt
Date: 2003-09-19 13:36:17 -0500 (Fri, 19 Sep 2003)
New Revision: 555
Added:
branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/017_x11_pkg_config_enable.diff
Removed:
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 02:17:40PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 20:36, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote:
Log:
Enabling pkg-config for libX11. The main artifact is that
there is now a file called /usr/lib/pkgconfig/X11.pc.
Shouldn't we wait
Is there a sorting order to the MANIFESTS, or can I just add whatever
whereever? I am going to make the changes for the other archs for the
pkg-config stuff.
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Is there any reason that I should not submit the patches for building
external Xcursor, Xft, and Xrender upstream?
wt
--
Warren Turkal
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Er, why include config.{guess,sub} and install.sh? Nothing in your
patch seems to call any of them...
Because Xft is designed that way. I am not really thinking much about the
design at this point. I will remove those files when I try to build next
time.
Warren
--
Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
Er, why include config.{guess,sub} and install.sh? Nothing in your
patch seems to call any of them...
Because Xft is designed that way. I am not really thinking much about the
design at this point. I will remove those files when I try to build next
time.
Warren
--
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:08:23AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
On a slightly realated note, I think Daniel is checking to see if the
current 017 is even needed for a proper build. It seems to be some legacy
from 4.2.
Built successfully sans #017.
In light
Warren Turkal wrote:
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:08:23AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
On a slightly realated note, I think Daniel is checking to see if the
current 017 is even needed for a proper build. It seems to be some
legacy from 4.2.
Built successfully sans #017
Here is a patch that enables pkg-config for libX11. I think that it has to
be applied before 017. My suggestion is to move 017 to 017a and put this
patch in as 017_x11-pkg-config-enable.diff. I will do this unless an
objection is posted on this list.
On a slightly realated note, I think Daniel is
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:08:23AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
On a slightly realated note, I think Daniel is checking to see if the
current 017 is even needed for a proper build. It seems to be some legacy
from 4.2.
Built successfully sans #017.
In light
Warren Turkal wrote:
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:08:23AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
On a slightly realated note, I think Daniel is checking to see if the
current 017 is even needed for a proper build. It seems to be some
legacy from 4.2.
Built successfully sans #017
I think this one is mainly for DanielS. What is up with the libglide3-dev
2002.04.10-3 build dep? The 2002.04.10-3 version is the latest in unstable.
Where is a newer version so that I can actually build 4.3?
wt
--
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
I think this one is mainly for DanielS. What is up with the libglide3-dev
2002.04.10-3 build dep? The 2002.04.10-3 version is the latest in unstable.
Where is a newer version so that I can actually build 4.3?
wt
--
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 08:57:29PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 08:15:19PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
If you want synaptics, I suggest you get branches/4.3.0/sid, and then
pull MANIFEST.*, xserver-xfree86.install
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 08:57:29PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 08:15:19PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
If you want synaptics, I suggest you get branches/4.3.0/sid, and then
pull MANIFEST.*, xserver-xfree86.install
at the
bottom. If I remove that file, it just brings up another file name. Maybe
it's a MANIFEST issue?
Warren Turkal
--
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Daniel Stone wrote:
I saw that, and I can't help but think it's a local issue: I've had no
issue on i386 and powerpc, chroot or no chroot, up-to-date sid. What
filesystem are you running? Do you have enough space? Are the permissions
all OK?
no chroot
my sid is up-to-date
ext3
16GB on the
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 08:15:19PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
If you want synaptics, I suggest you get branches/4.3.0/sid, and then pull
MANIFEST.*, xserver-xfree86.install.* and patch #066 from
people/daniel/synaptics.
I am building pre-464. The synaptics was added
at the
bottom. If I remove that file, it just brings up another file name. Maybe
it's a MANIFEST issue?
Warren Turkal
--
President, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Daniel Stone wrote:
I saw that, and I can't help but think it's a local issue: I've had no
issue on i386 and powerpc, chroot or no chroot, up-to-date sid. What
filesystem are you running? Do you have enough space? Are the permissions
all OK?
no chroot
my sid is up-to-date
ext3
16GB on the
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 08:15:19PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
If you want synaptics, I suggest you get branches/4.3.0/sid, and then pull
MANIFEST.*, xserver-xfree86.install.* and patch #066 from
people/daniel/synaptics.
I am building pre-464. The synaptics was added
Ananian, who earlier mailed this list
Hartwig Felger
Peter Osterlund
Emailed without reply:
S. Lehner
Stefan Gmeiner
Bruce Kall
Bounced Email:
Henry Davies - I think I have a phone number
Cheers, Warren Turkal
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
The sun type6 keyboard patch was accepted upstream so that everyone knows.
Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please apply this patch for the README. I has more info about the new dbs
build system.
Index: README
===
--- README (revision 380)
+++ README (working copy)
@@ -18,11 +18,17 @@
This package uses DBS, the Debian Build
Is there anyone out there that could set the svn:executable property on the
rules file so that it is executable update checkout? I am not going to
modify the 4.3.0 branch without prior perimission.
Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
, Warren Turkal
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 05:09:51PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
This patch forces the use of the gcc 3.2 c preprocessor since 3.3 did not
handle -traditional right.
Is this patch still needed with gcc 3.3.1?
Don't know. Would you like to find out? :)
Can I get
Branden Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 05:09:51PM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
This patch forces the use of the gcc 3.2 c preprocessor since 3.3 did not
handle -traditional right.
Is this patch still needed with gcc 3.3.1?
Don't know. Would you like to find out? :)
Can I get
, Warren Turkal
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Daniel Stone wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:24:45AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
The patch numbers are not being properly followed.
#003 should be merged upstream, so other people can build Debian packages;
the
only part is where we do #define DebianMaintainer YES, or such - that's
Is there anyone out there that could set the svn:executable property on the
rules file so that it is executable update checkout? I am not going to
modify the 4.3.0 branch without prior perimission.
Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
This patch forces the use of the gcc 3.2 c preprocessor since 3.3 did not
handle -traditional right.
Is this patch still needed with gcc 3.3.1?
Warren Turkal
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Everyone, please check this update for sanity. It changes the README to
document more of the new dbs features.
Warren Turkal
Index: README
===
--- README (revision 380)
+++ README (working copy)
@@ -18,11 +18,17
or maybe just refer to it
Warren Turkal
diff -uNr debian.20030726/control debian/control
--- debian.20030726/control 2003-07-26 00:03:15.0 -0500
+++ debian/control 2003-07-26 22:44:09.0 -0500
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uploaders: Branden
or maybe just refer to it
Warren Turkal
diff -uNr debian.20030726/control debian/control
--- debian.20030726/control 2003-07-26 00:03:15.0 -0500
+++ debian/control 2003-07-26 22:44:09.0 -0500
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Maintainer: Debian X Strike Force debian-x@lists.debian.org
Uploaders
On Friday 18 July 2003 06:00 am, Micha wrote:
Package: XFree86
Version: 4.1.0.1
I installed Linux Debian 3.0 (WOODY) (bf24 flavor) on Intel P4 1.8GHz
machine with
256Mb of RAM, graphics card NVIDIA GeForce2 MX/MX 400 (AGP) (BIOS version
3.11.0148), monitor Vobis Highscreen MS15AS.
On Friday 18 July 2003 06:00 am, Michał wrote:
Package: XFree86
Version: 4.1.0.1
I installed Linux Debian 3.0 (WOODY) (bf24 flavor) on Intel P4 1.8GHz
machine with
256Mb of RAM, graphics card NVIDIA GeForce2 MX/MX 400 (AGP) (BIOS version
3.11.0148), monitor Vobis Highscreen MS15AS.
4.2.1-9 version of the xfree packages don't allow ctrl-alt-f? sequences to
switch to the console. Is this supposed to happen?
Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4.2.1-9 version of the xfree packages don't allow ctrl-alt-f? sequences to
switch to the console. Is this supposed to happen?
Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Is there a list of what is pending for XFree 4.3.0 in order to get it into
unstable?
Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a list of what is pending for XFree 4.3.0 in order to get it into
unstable?
Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
Here is a patch for the xfree86-4.3.0/debian/ directory as of the June 21
nightly snapshot from the xsf svn that converts to the newest dbs building
scheme.
There are a few deleted files.
debian/
doogie-build-system
debian/scripts/
fix.source.patch
patch.apply
patch.unapply
On Monday 23 June 2003 03:54 am, Warren Turkal wrote:
Here is a patch for the xfree86-4.3.0/debian/ directory as of the June 21
nightly snapshot from the xsf svn that converts to the newest dbs building
scheme.
There are a few deleted files.
debian/
doogie-build-system
debian
Here is a patch for the xfree86-4.3.0/debian/ directory as of the June 21
nightly snapshot from the xsf svn that converts to the newest dbs building
scheme.
There are a few deleted files.
debian/
doogie-build-system
debian/scripts/
fix.source.patch
patch.apply
patch.unapply
On Monday 23 June 2003 03:54 am, Warren Turkal wrote:
Here is a patch for the xfree86-4.3.0/debian/ directory as of the June 21
nightly snapshot from the xsf svn that converts to the newest dbs building
scheme.
There are a few deleted files.
debian/
doogie-build-system
debian
Is there any interest in moving the current debian dir in the xfree stuff to
the current dbs that is available? It appears to have some useful patch
manipulation utilities that don't seem to be available in the version in the
X packages.
Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
On Friday 20 June 2003 02:25 am, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:57:56AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
Is there any interest in moving the current debian dir in the xfree stuff
to the current dbs that is available? It appears to have some useful
patch manipulation utilities
Is there any interest in moving the current debian dir in the xfree stuff to
the current dbs that is available? It appears to have some useful patch
manipulation utilities that don't seem to be available in the version in the
X packages.
Warren
--
Treasurer, GOLUM, Inc.
http://www.golum.org
On Friday 20 June 2003 02:25 am, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 01:57:56AM -0500, Warren Turkal wrote:
Is there any interest in moving the current debian dir in the xfree stuff
to the current dbs that is available? It appears to have some useful
patch manipulation utilities
I am using the debs from:
deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/i386/
deb http://hanzubon.jp/HANZUBON/ hanzubon/all/
Xlib-dev has the xcursor-config file in it where it should not. Also, the
fontconfig package appears not to work. It has killed any gtk2 programs that
I try to use.
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
