The list was broken, trying again.
--
Earthling Michel Dnzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
---BeginMessage---
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 05:01, Branden Robinson wrote:
Look, it's really simple.
Agreed.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 05:06:57PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
As I said before: If the utah-glx packages stop providing the virtual
packages, they must either move the conflicting files or C/R the virtual
packages. There is no realistic scenario where the relations on the
virtual packages
The list was broken, trying again.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer
Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
---BeginMessage---
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 05:01, Branden Robinson wrote:
Look, it's really simple.
Agreed.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 05:06:57PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
As I said before: If the utah-glx packages stop providing the virtual
packages, they must either move the conflicting files or C/R the virtual
packages. There is no realistic scenario where the relations on the
virtual packages
4 matches
Mail list logo