Re: 4.2.0pre1v1 debs, dri support, intel i810

2002-07-31 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 22:26, Michael Cardenas wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:57:48PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > ... > > > I just wanted to ask if there's a reason that the 4.2.0 pre1v1 debs > > > weren't compiled against the updated 1.2.0 kernel modules? > > > > It's not a matter of compil

Re: 4.2.0pre1v1 debs, dri support, intel i810

2002-07-31 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 01:26:01PM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote: > Are you saying that the dri modules in xfree86 need to be compiled > against the headers of the running kernel? No, the DRI modules in XFree86 need to be *written* against the new version of the interface. This is not a compliati

Re: 4.2.0pre1v1 debs, dri support, intel i810

2002-07-31 Thread Michael Cardenas
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:57:48PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: ... > > I just wanted to ask if there's a reason that the 4.2.0 pre1v1 debs > > weren't compiled against the updated 1.2.0 kernel modules? > > It's not a matter of compiling against the kernel modules, on the > contrary the source for

Re: 4.2.0pre1v1 debs, dri support, intel i810

2002-07-31 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 19:00, Michael Cardenas wrote: > > We're trying to use your pre1v1 debs here at lindows, and our qa dept > found that the intel i810 card is not accelerated for 3d. > > I found in /var/log/XFree86.0.log that the i810 X module wanted > version 1.2.0 of the i810 kernel modul

4.2.0pre1v1 debs, dri support, intel i810

2002-07-30 Thread Michael Cardenas
Hello everyone. We're trying to use your pre1v1 debs here at lindows, and our qa dept found that the intel i810 card is not accelerated for 3d. I found in /var/log/XFree86.0.log that the i810 X module wanted version 1.2.0 of the i810 kernel module, and I found the kernel patch on xfree86.org fo