On Wed, May 24, 2006 at 09:10:28AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:06:50PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magall?n wrote:
> > On 5/15/06, Marcelo E. Magall?n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Yes, sorry about that. My copy was still building when I sent that
> > >message. I'm waiting for
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 09:16 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 17:01 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> >
> > Do you mean the old xserver (1.0.2) will simply not build with the new
> > mesa 6.5?
>
> Yes, that's what I've been trying to say...
>
> > That surprises me. For my educati
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was trying to be cautious since I don't really understand which parts
> of Mesa are needed for the X bits build. My guess is the rasterizer.
Fair enough; it's definitely better to err on the side of inclusion.
At any rate, although I'm not
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 05:01:01PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 08:46 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 11:36 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > > How do you plan to coordinate the move to testing between mesa,
> > > > xorg-server and xprint? AFAICT the curre
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 17:01 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 08:46 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 11:36 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How do you plan to coordinate the move to testing between mesa,
> > > > xorg-server and xprint? AFAICT the cur
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 11:36 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Michel wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 21:08 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok, I've still got plenty of bugs in Xorg 7.0 to squash, so feel free to
> > > take your time getting 6.5 in to experimental. Once it's there, I'll get
>
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 10:54:21PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 02:25:29PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 21:08 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > > Ok, I've still got plenty of bugs in Xorg 7.0 to squash, so feel free to
> > > take your time getting 6.
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 02:25:29PM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 21:08 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> >
> > Ok, I've still got plenty of bugs in Xorg 7.0 to squash, so feel free to
> > take your time getting 6.5 in to experimental. Once it's there, I'll get
> > started on pu
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 08:46 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 11:36 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > >
> > > How do you plan to coordinate the move to testing between mesa,
> > > xorg-server and xprint? AFAICT the current versions of the latter two
> > > are missing something like
Hi Aaron,
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 03:01:07PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> backfires badly, yielding unusable binary packages. In addition, the
> new approach seems to be major overkill -- whereas 6.4.1-0.4 shipped
> 349 files totalling ~7.6M, 6.4.2-1 ships 1060 files totalling ~18.3M.
Ah,
Michel wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 21:08 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> >
> > Ok, I've still got plenty of bugs in Xorg 7.0 to squash, so feel free to
> > take your time getting 6.5 in to experimental. Once it's there, I'll get
> > started on putting Xorg 7.1 in, and we can coordinate the uplo
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 14:28 -0600, Marcelo E. Magallón wrote:
> In http://ksub.org/~marcelo/debian/mesa/ you'll find:
>
> mesa_6.4.2-1.diff.gz
> mesa_6.4.2-1.dsc
> mesa_6.5.0.cvs.20060524-1.diff.gz
> mesa_6.5.0.cvs.20060524-1.dsc
>
> These are my RC candidates. Please download these files and re
For the most part, your release candidates look good, and I'm pleased
to report that they build without errors on my amd64 box. However, I
found the autogenerated mesa-swx11-source.install files to be a bit
off. The main problem is one of formatting: dh_install always
interprets destination paths
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 21:08 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
>
> Ok, I've still got plenty of bugs in Xorg 7.0 to squash, so feel free to
> take your time getting 6.5 in to experimental. Once it's there, I'll get
> started on putting Xorg 7.1 in, and we can coordinate the upload to
> unstable then.
In http://ksub.org/~marcelo/debian/mesa/ you'll find:
mesa_6.4.2-1.diff.gz
mesa_6.4.2-1.dsc
mesa_6.5.0.cvs.20060524-1.diff.gz
mesa_6.5.0.cvs.20060524-1.dsc
These are my RC candidates. Please download these files and report
any trouble you have. I've been building these in a pbuilder chroot,
so
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 08:08:37AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 21:39 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> >
> > My current thinking is that 6.5 should be uploaded to unstable [...]
>
> And make xorg-server 1.0 FTBFS?
>
> It might be easier if the xorg-server source package just
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:26:10PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:39:14PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
>
> > Now that Xorg 7.1 is out, we need to work out some plan for actually
> > uploading 6.5 to the archive. My current plan is to stage 7.1 in
> > expe
Hi,
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:39:14PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> Now that Xorg 7.1 is out, we need to work out some plan for actually
> uploading 6.5 to the archive. My current plan is to stage 7.1 in
> experimental very soon, and then when it's stabilized move it to
> unstable. Since Br
On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 21:39 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
>
> My current thinking is that 6.5 should be uploaded to unstable [...]
And make xorg-server 1.0 FTBFS?
It might be easier if the xorg-server source package just included the
Mesa bits it needs...
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer |
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 09:35:41AM -0600, Marcelo E. Magall??n wrote:
> [ Please Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
>
> In http://ksub.org/~marcelo/debian/mesa/ I have put two .dsc and
> .diff.gz sets of files. One is for Mesa 6.4.2 which is probably
> boring for most people reading this. The other is for
20 matches
Mail list logo
