If libraries need to be strictly synced with their protos, then, going
down the list of protos, we're still waiting in experimental (if not
unstable) for
libx11 1.0.1 (which I assume matches x11proto-core)
libxcomposite 0.3
libxdamage 1.0.3
libxevie1.0.1
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 14:37 +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
If we're happy to live without xf86rushproto, then can we now bring the
outstanding experimental proto packages across to unstable?
Not without dealing with at least one issue, I think: Anyone remember
what happened when David
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:37:20PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
All existing x11proto packages are up to date for X11R7.1, either in
unstable or in experimental. x11proto-core is ahead of schedule, at
latest v7.0.7 rather than 7.1's v7.0.5.
Debian does not contain a x11proto package for
All existing x11proto packages are up to date for X11R7.1, either in
unstable or in experimental. x11proto-core is ahead of schedule, at
latest v7.0.7 rather than 7.1's v7.0.5.
Debian does not contain a x11proto package for xf86rushproto,
applewmproto, or windowswmproto, the latter for obvious
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 02:37:20PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
Debian does not contain a x11proto package for xf86rushproto,
applewmproto, or windowswmproto, the latter for obvious reasons. I
gather we don't need xf86rushproto?
If we're happy to live without xf86rushproto, then can we now
5 matches
Mail list logo
