On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 19:26, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 23:19, Dan Christensen wrote:
> >>> Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>>
> >>> > use the X11 Framebuffer drive
On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 19:26, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 23:19, Dan Christensen wrote:
> >>> Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>>
> >>> > use the X11 Framebuffer driv
Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 23:19, Dan Christensen wrote:
>>> Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> > use the X11 Framebuffer driver (with the radeonfb driver in Linux 2.4),
>>>
>>> ["modprobe rade
Dan Christensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 23:19, Dan Christensen wrote:
>>> Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> > use the X11 Framebuffer driver (with the radeonfb driver in Linux 2.4),
>>>
>>> ["modprobe rad
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 23:19, Dan Christensen wrote:
>> Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> Alternatively, is there any work-around I could use in the meantime?
>> >
>> > use the X11 Framebuffer driver (with the radeonfb driver in Linux 2.4
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 23:19, Dan Christensen wrote:
>> Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> Alternatively, is there any work-around I could use in the meantime?
>> >
>> > use the X11 Framebuffer driver (with the radeonfb driver in Linux 2.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 05:19:11PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> The first three times I tried to boot after this, my machine froze
> during the boot process or within a minute after. The fourth time it
> seems to be staying up.
But the FOURTH TIME, it STAYED UP!
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 23:19, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Alternatively, is there any work-around I could use in the meantime?
> >
> > Sure use the X11 Framebuffer driver (with the radeonfb driver in Linux
> > 2.4),
>
> Thanks, I just compiled 2.4.17
Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Alternatively, is there any work-around I could use in the meantime?
>
> Sure use the X11 Framebuffer driver (with the radeonfb driver in Linux 2.4),
Thanks, I just compiled 2.4.17 with radeonfb as a module. When I
ran startx, it complained about no
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 05:19:11PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> The first three times I tried to boot after this, my machine froze
> during the boot process or within a minute after. The fourth time it
> seems to be staying up.
But the FOURTH TIME, it STAYED UP!
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 23:19, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Alternatively, is there any work-around I could use in the meantime?
> >
> > Sure use the X11 Framebuffer driver (with the radeonfb driver in Linux 2.4),
>
> Thanks, I just compiled 2.4.17 with
Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Alternatively, is there any work-around I could use in the meantime?
>
> Sure use the X11 Framebuffer driver (with the radeonfb driver in Linux 2.4),
Thanks, I just compiled 2.4.17 with radeonfb as a module. When I
ran startx, it complained about no
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:05:00PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I wonder if you had time to provide that patch set you mentioned on
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2001/debian-x-200111/msg00033.html
> > to Branden yet ? I downloaded a 4.1.99.1
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:05:00PM -0500, Dan Christensen wrote:
> Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I wonder if you had time to provide that patch set you mentioned on
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2001/debian-x-200111/msg00033.html
> > to Branden yet ? I downloaded a 4.1.99.
Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wonder if you had time to provide that patch set you mentioned on
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2001/debian-x-200111/msg00033.html
> to Branden yet ? I downloaded a 4.1.99.1 binary package elsewhere and
> found the Mobility Radeon M6 2D support to
Lars Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wonder if you had time to provide that patch set you mentioned on
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2001/debian-x-200111/msg00033.html
> to Branden yet ? I downloaded a 4.1.99.1 binary package elsewhere and
> found the Mobility Radeon M6 2D support to
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [FYI: you guys KNOW I read debian-x, so take it easy with the private
> CC's.]
My bad. I should've checked the cc list before replying. Sorry :-)
> > Nope, not yet. I've been tied up with other issues (and RL), so the X
> > work has suffered. Do
[FYI: you guys KNOW I read debian-x, so take it easy with the private
CC's.]
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:11:41PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Lars Steinke wrote:
>
> > I wonder if you had time to provide that patch set you mentioned on
> > http://lists.debian.org/
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [FYI: you guys KNOW I read debian-x, so take it easy with the private
> CC's.]
My bad. I should've checked the cc list before replying. Sorry :-)
> > Nope, not yet. I've been tied up with other issues (and RL), so the X
> > work has suffered. D
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Lars Steinke wrote:
> I wonder if you had time to provide that patch set you mentioned on
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2001/debian-x-200111/msg00033.html
> to Branden yet ? I downloaded a 4.1.99.1 binary package elsewhere and
> found the Mobility Radeon M6 2D support to
[FYI: you guys KNOW I read debian-x, so take it easy with the private
CC's.]
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 12:11:41PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Lars Steinke wrote:
>
> > I wonder if you had time to provide that patch set you mentioned on
> > http://lists.debian.org
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Lars Steinke wrote:
> I wonder if you had time to provide that patch set you mentioned on
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2001/debian-x-200111/msg00033.html
> to Branden yet ? I downloaded a 4.1.99.1 binary package elsewhere and
> found the Mobility Radeon M6 2D support to
Hi Christopher,
I wonder if you had time to provide that patch set you mentioned on
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2001/debian-x-200111/msg00033.html
to Branden yet ? I downloaded a 4.1.99.1 binary package elsewhere and
found the Mobility Radeon M6 2D support to be sound, but to allow
accelerate
Hi Christopher,
I wonder if you had time to provide that patch set you mentioned on
http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2001/debian-x-200111/msg00033.html
to Branden yet ? I downloaded a 4.1.99.1 binary package elsewhere and
found the Mobility Radeon M6 2D support to be sound, but to allow
accelerat
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> If they're well-constrained, yes. If someone rolls up and tests a
> patch, then files it as a wishlist bug against xserver-xfree86, it's
> much more likely to happen.
Consider it on my "to-do" list for this weekend :-) Hopefully, the
changes neede
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Branden Robinson wrote:
> If they're well-constrained, yes. If someone rolls up and tests a
> patch, then files it as a wishlist bug against xserver-xfree86, it's
> much more likely to happen.
Consider it on my "to-do" list for this weekend :-) Hopefully, the
changes need
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 06:59:50AM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> Nope, at least not for the chip that I have in my TiBook (M6 LY). I
> believe the patches only exist in the XFree86 CVS repos.
>
> Branden, any hopes of checking into incorporating those changes? There
> seem to be a ton
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:35:44AM +0100, Roman Beigelbeck wrote:
> Does the latest DEBs of XFree (current version in unstable
> is 4.1.0-9pre10v5)
The version in unstable is 4.1.0-9. That people don't understand what
4.1.0-9pre10v5 is influences me to not make these builds available
anymore.
>
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Roman Beigelbeck wrote:
> Does the latest DEBs of XFree (current version in unstable
> is 4.1.0-9pre10v5) contain the patches for "ATI Mobility Radeon"
> support?
>
> I guess not because I found no information about that in the
> changelog file(s). :-(
Nope, at least not fo
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 06:59:50AM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> Nope, at least not for the chip that I have in my TiBook (M6 LY). I
> believe the patches only exist in the XFree86 CVS repos.
>
> Branden, any hopes of checking into incorporating those changes? There
> seem to be a ton
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:35:44AM +0100, Roman Beigelbeck wrote:
> Does the latest DEBs of XFree (current version in unstable
> is 4.1.0-9pre10v5)
The version in unstable is 4.1.0-9. That people don't understand what
4.1.0-9pre10v5 is influences me to not make these builds available
anymore.
>
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Roman Beigelbeck wrote:
> Does the latest DEBs of XFree (current version in unstable
> is 4.1.0-9pre10v5) contain the patches for "ATI Mobility Radeon"
> support?
>
> I guess not because I found no information about that in the
> changelog file(s). :-(
Nope, at least not f
Hi!
Does the latest DEBs of XFree (current version in unstable
is 4.1.0-9pre10v5) contain the patches for "ATI Mobility Radeon"
support?
I guess not because I found no information about that in the
changelog file(s). :-(
Bye and best wishes from Roman!
Hi!
Does the latest DEBs of XFree (current version in unstable
is 4.1.0-9pre10v5) contain the patches for "ATI Mobility Radeon"
support?
I guess not because I found no information about that in the
changelog file(s). :-(
Bye and best wishes from Roman!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
34 matches
Mail list logo
