On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 02:32:38PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> That won't help. The debuggable XFree86 X server in xserver-xfree86-dbg
> is also monolithic, and does not use the module loader.
>
> The good news is that this means that xserver-xfree86-dbg will probably
> just plain work.
Bra
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 02:32:38PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> That won't help. The debuggable XFree86 X server in xserver-xfree86-dbg
> is also monolithic, and does not use the module loader.
>
> The good news is that this means that xserver-xfree86-dbg will probably
> just plain work.
Bra
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:17:17PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > To my eyes the error seems to be with loadable modules. The following
> > two lines are repeated several thousand times in XFree86.0.log.
> >
> > Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 18
> > Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:17:17PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > To my eyes the error seems to be with loadable modules. The following
> > two lines are repeated several thousand times in XFree86.0.log.
> >
> > Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 18
> > Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:17:17PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
[..snip..]
> > To my eyes the error seems to be with loadable modules. The following
> > two lines are repeated several thousand times in XFree86.0.log.
> >
> > Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 18
> > Elf_RelocateEntry()
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:17:17PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
[..snip..]
> > To my eyes the error seems to be with loadable modules. The following
> > two lines are repeated several thousand times in XFree86.0.log.
> >
> > Elf_RelocateEntry() Unsupported relocation type 18
> > Elf_RelocateEntry()
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 04:01:39PM +0100, Martin Samuelsson scrawled:
> It seems like the xserver in this new version is impossible to start. My
> guess is that this is a platform specific bug to the alpha port.
>
> An identical configuration file and a few other tried worked with
> 4.2.1-3 (4.2.1
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 04:01:39PM +0100, Martin Samuelsson scrawled:
> It seems like the xserver in this new version is impossible to start. My
> guess is that this is a platform specific bug to the alpha port.
>
> An identical configuration file and a few other tried worked with
> 4.2.1-3 (4.2.1
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: normal
It seems like the xserver in this new version is impossible to start. My
guess is that this is a platform specific bug to the alpha port.
An identical configuration file and a few other tried worked with
4.2.1-3 (4.2.1-4 failed compilatio
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: normal
It seems like the xserver in this new version is impossible to start. My
guess is that this is a platform specific bug to the alpha port.
An identical configuration file and a few other tried worked with
4.2.1-3 (4.2.1-4 failed compilatio
10 matches
Mail list logo
