On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 08:16:45PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Branden Robinson wrote:
> > So I stand by my decision that this question needs to be high priority
> > under *some* circumstances. Naturally I'm interested in minimizing
> > those.
>
> What do you think about skipping the question about
Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 05:46:46PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Package: xserver-xfree86
> > Version: 4.2.1-14
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > If my debconf priority is high, I do not want to be bothered by
> > questions that have a reasonable default.
>
> In my opinion, mon
retitle 226365 xserver-xfree86: [debconfage rewrite] selection-method question
should be displayed at high priority under fewer circumstances
thanks
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 05:46:46PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: xserver-xfree86
> Version: 4.2.1-14
> Severity: normal
>
> If my debconf prio
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 226365 xserver-xfree86: [debconfage rewrite] selection-method
> question should be displayed at high priority under fewer circumstances
Bug#226365: selection-method question should not be displayed at high priority
Changed Bug title.
&g
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-14
Severity: normal
If my debconf priority is high, I do not want to be bothered by
questions that have a reasonable default. This is the definition of the
priority. So it is annoying to have this package's
monitor/selection-method question displayed at high
5 matches
Mail list logo
