Re: Bug#234808: Updated patch for 4.3.0

2004-05-12 Thread Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
On Mon, 10 May 2004, Peter Naulls wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Fabio, should we add this to the -2 TODO? I take non-x86 architecture > > support pretty seriously and would vote +1 on this, myself. It doesn't > > look disrup

Bug#234808: Updated patch for 4.3.0

2004-05-10 Thread Peter Naulls
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fabio, should we add this to the -2 TODO? I take non-x86 architecture > support pretty seriously and would vote +1 on this, myself. It doesn't > look disruptive or mysterious. This looks correct, based upon m

Bug#234808: Updated patch for 4.3.0

2004-05-10 Thread Branden Robinson
tag 234808 - moreinfo thanks On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:10:40PM +0100, Wookey wrote: > Here is an updated version of the 4.1.0 patch that applies to 4.3.0. > > It replaces the existing 315_arm_* patch that was the result of the > partial bug223567 patch. > > I haven't yet proved that it works (b

Processed: Re: Bug#234808: Updated patch for 4.3.0

2004-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 234808 - moreinfo Bug#234808: xserver-xfree86: improve XFree86 X server's support for ARM Tags were: upstream moreinfo patch Tags removed: moreinfo > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking s

Bug#234808: Updated patch for 4.3.0

2004-05-07 Thread Wookey
Here is an updated version of the 4.1.0 patch that applies to 4.3.0. It replaces the existing 315_arm_* patch that was the result of the partial bug223567 patch. I haven't yet proved that it works (building now...), but I do think that this bug needs upgrading from wishlist - xfree86 doesn't work