On Mon, 10 May 2004, Peter Naulls wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Fabio, should we add this to the -2 TODO? I take non-x86 architecture
> > support pretty seriously and would vote +1 on this, myself. It doesn't
> > look disrup
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabio, should we add this to the -2 TODO? I take non-x86 architecture
> support pretty seriously and would vote +1 on this, myself. It doesn't
> look disruptive or mysterious.
This looks correct, based upon m
tag 234808 - moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:10:40PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> Here is an updated version of the 4.1.0 patch that applies to 4.3.0.
>
> It replaces the existing 315_arm_* patch that was the result of the
> partial bug223567 patch.
>
> I haven't yet proved that it works (b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 234808 - moreinfo
Bug#234808: xserver-xfree86: improve XFree86 X server's support for ARM
Tags were: upstream moreinfo patch
Tags removed: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
Here is an updated version of the 4.1.0 patch that applies to 4.3.0.
It replaces the existing 315_arm_* patch that was the result of the
partial bug223567 patch.
I haven't yet proved that it works (building now...), but I do think that
this bug needs upgrading from wishlist - xfree86 doesn't work
5 matches
Mail list logo