Hi,
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:04:24AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2007 at 01:39:34 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I'm working on a patch to build vm86 and x86emu as two separate modules,
> int10 being a wrapper around them, which is pending testing with a 64bit
I've tested in
On Mon, Feb 5, 2007 at 01:39:34 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Indeed, this is a regression from the transition to modular X, the code
> implementing a fallback from vm86 to x86emu isn't getting built.
> In hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/int10/linux.c, this code is dependent on
> the DoSubModules ma
On Mon, Feb 5, 2007 at 01:39:34 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Indeed, this is a regression from the transition to modular X, the code
> implementing a fallback from vm86 to x86emu isn't getting built.
> In hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/int10/linux.c, this code is dependent on
> the DoSubModules ma
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 01:39:34AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I'm filing this as a serious bug against the Xorg server, because Debian
> ships 64bit kernels on i386
No, actually, we don't. Do you think it's fair to downgrade this bug then?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Severity: serious
On Mon, Feb 5, 2007 at 01:26:22 +0200, Martins Krikis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Having just tried to launch a 32-bit x86 Xorg X server with an
> x86_64 kernel, I was forced to spend a lot of time educating
> myself about why this doesn't work.
>
> The rel
5 matches
Mail list logo
