On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:21:25PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 01:14:17AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 08:27:18PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > > grep'ing the code, I see some special case in wcwidth.c (the built-in
> > > flavor)
> > > whic
PROTECTED]
Asunto: Bug#418324: xterm: baffling weirdness with 9x15 font and some
Unicode glyphs
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 08:27:18PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> grep'ing the code, I see some special case in wcwidth.c (the built-in
> flavor) which may be related - makes xterm treat tho
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 08:27:18PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> grep'ing the code, I see some special case in wcwidth.c (the built-in flavor)
> which may be related - makes xterm treat those codes as double-width. I
> expect
> they're being scaled.
xterm does treat them as double-width in all t
Package: xterm
Version: 222-3
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
This is an upstream issue, I'll wager.
The root of my complaint is that the Unicode glyphs LEFT-POINTING ANGLE
BRACKET (U+2329) and RIGHT-POINTING ANGLE BRACKET (U+232A) don't render
when I size my xterms up to the "Large" font. This
4 matches
Mail list logo