reassign 446851 hal
retitle 446851 Please package new upstream version which includes x11-input.fdi
thanks
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:45:11AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 19:16 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:46:54AM -0700, Warren Turkal wrote:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 446851 hal
Bug#446851: xserver-xorg-core: please copy (and improve) x11-input.fdi to
/usr/share/hal/fdi/policy/
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg-core' to `hal'.
> retitle 446851 Please package new upstream version which includes
> x
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 19:16 -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:46:54AM -0700, Warren Turkal wrote:
> > On 10/17/07, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Because it's not clearly in the domain of Xorg. x11-input makes sense,
> > > but then again, it's largely a syste
On 10/17/07, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you could open that as another bug, that'd be much preferrable to
> discussing it in this one.
Fair enough.
wt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:45:20PM -0700, Warren Turkal wrote:
> On 10/17/07, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think including it in our package until HAL gets it is probably the right
> > move. More package churn on the server is probably going to be a fact of
> > life for a while an
On 10/17/07, David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think including it in our package until HAL gets it is probably the right
> move. More package churn on the server is probably going to be a fact of
> life for a while anyway. The reason I haven't really put much work in to
> input hotplug i
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:46:54AM -0700, Warren Turkal wrote:
> On 10/17/07, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Because it's not clearly in the domain of Xorg. x11-input makes sense,
> > but then again, it's largely a system decision. OTOH, XKB can be used
> > in the console, not just i
On 10/17/07, Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because it's not clearly in the domain of Xorg. x11-input makes sense,
> but then again, it's largely a system decision. OTOH, XKB can be used
> in the console, not just in X (hence why it's namespaced input.xkb and
> not input.x11.xkb or so)
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 21:46 -0700, Warren Turkal wrote:
> On 10/16/07, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > AFAIK the reason it isn't installed by upstream is that it's just a stop
> > gap until HAL ships its own file(s) for this. Shipping it in X packages
> > now would go against this and
On 10/16/07, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK the reason it isn't installed by upstream is that it's just a stop
> gap until HAL ships its own file(s) for this. Shipping it in X packages
> now would go against this and might cause packaging churn down the road.
Why would hal ship a
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 23:30 -0700, Warren Turkal wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-core
> Version: 2:1.4-3
> Severity: important
>
> The file xorg-server-1.4/config/x11-input.fdi should be copied to
> /etc/hal/fdi/policy/. This will allow hotplug input to work as well as
> possible with the current
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 2:1.4-3
Severity: important
The file xorg-server-1.4/config/x11-input.fdi should be copied to
/etc/hal/fdi/policy/. This will allow hotplug input to work as well as
possible with the current version of xorg.
wt
-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/lib/x1
12 matches
Mail list logo
