On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:21:09 +0200, Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> 2008/6/24 Jiri Palecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>> Last, would it be possible to make it also consider the maximum
>>> pixelclock of
>>> the
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:21:09 +0200, Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
2008/6/24 Jiri Palecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Last, would it be possible to make it also consider the maximum
pixelclock of
the CRT (for example, if you want the maximum pixelclock of the CRT, the
algorithm might get
2008/6/24 Jiri Palecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Tags: fixed-upstream
>
> On Monday 23 June 2008 21:55:21 Alex Deucher wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I prepared a new (better) version of the patch. Please consider applying
>> >
Tags: fixed-upstream
On Monday 23 June 2008 21:55:21 Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I prepared a new (better) version of the patch. Please consider applying
> > it or otherwise fixing the bug.
> >
> > Some comments
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I prepared a new (better) version of the patch. Please consider applying it
> or otherwise fixing the bug.
>
> Some comments:
>
> The first patch causes abort instead of hangs when PLL computation fails.
>
> The
Hello,
I prepared a new (better) version of the patch. Please consider applying
it or otherwise fixing the bug.
Some comments:
The first patch causes abort instead of hangs when PLL computation fails.
The second changes the algorithm so it doesn't miss any solution which
might be better t
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:58:38 +0100, Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
sorry that I mystified you in the last email, it seems that I've done
the
test with a different version if the driver (not 6.8.0).
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> sorry that I mystified you in the last email, it seems that I've done the
> test with a different version if the driver (not 6.8.0). The correct
> results are: 82 Hz works, 84 and 86 not.
The base problem here
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:44:28 +0100, Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:32:24 +0100, Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2008/2/27 Jiri Palecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> On Monday
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:32:24 +0100, Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
> > 2008/2/27 Jiri Palecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >> On Monday 25 February 2008 18:18:32 Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> >> > There's someth
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:32:24 +0100, Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
2008/2/27 Jiri Palecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Monday 25 February 2008 18:18:32 Alex Deucher wrote:
> There's something about 1400x1050 mode that the driver doesn't like.
> if you remove the preferred mode from you
2008/2/27 Jiri Palecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Monday 25 February 2008 18:18:32 Alex Deucher wrote:
> > 2008/2/21 Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:09:04 +0100, Brice Goglin
> > >
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Jiří Paleček wrote:
> > > >> Sorry, it
On Monday 25 February 2008 18:18:32 Alex Deucher wrote:
> 2008/2/21 Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:09:04 +0100, Brice Goglin
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Jiří Paleček wrote:
> > >> Sorry, it was my fault. I was doing it in a local copy of git, and
> > >>
2008/2/21 Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:09:04 +0100, Brice Goglin
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Jiří Paleček wrote:
> >> Sorry, it was my fault. I was doing it in a local copy of git, and
> >> there was a new include directory added which I didn't have in the
Jiří Paleček wrote:
> Sorry, it was my fault. I was doing it in a local copy of git, and
> there was a new include directory added which I didn't have in the
> makefiles... autoreconf did the job. Anyway, the patch didn't help.
Can you send the corresponding log? Alex Deucher (the author of the
pa
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:07:09 +0100, Brice Goglin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jiří Paleček wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:36:35 +0100, Brice Goglin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:30:22PM +0100, Ji??í Pale??ek wrote:
OK. The bad commit is
commit f3d2ec3a5ae61215c7920183
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:36:35 +0100, Brice Goglin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:30:22PM +0100, Ji??í Pale??ek wrote:
OK. The bad commit is
commit f3d2ec3a5ae61215c792018320158750e7aa937c
Author: Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED](none)>
Date: Tue Dec 11 11:57:27 2007 -0
Jiří Paleček wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:36:35 +0100, Brice Goglin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:30:22PM +0100, Ji??í Pale??ek wrote:
>>> OK. The bad commit is
>>>
>>> commit f3d2ec3a5ae61215c792018320158750e7aa937c
>>> Author: Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED](none
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:30:22PM +0100, Ji??í Pale??ek wrote:
> OK. The bad commit is
>
> commit f3d2ec3a5ae61215c792018320158750e7aa937c
> Author: Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED](none)>
> Date: Tue Dec 11 11:57:27 2007 -0500
>
> RADEON: rewrite PLL computation
Can you try the patch at htt
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:32:37 +0100, Brice Goglin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jiří Paleček wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
Version: 1:6.7.198~git20080203.f65e8dfa-1
Severity: important
Hello
when I start X, the computer freezes and doesn't react even to magic
SysRq. This happens with -
Jiří Paleček wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-video-ati
> Version: 1:6.7.198~git20080203.f65e8dfa-1
> Severity: important
>
> Hello
>
> when I start X, the computer freezes and doesn't react even to magic
> SysRq. This happens with -video-ati versions > 6.7.196.
>
> The log and the diff to normal sta
21 matches
Mail list logo
