Hello David,
> All of that said, it's very likely that we will downgrade the depends
> to recommends, just not right now. We have actual important bugs like
> totally broken installs that we want to deal with first.
It's been 5 months since then, could you please give us an update on
this?
I'm s
Hi,
Just following up to David Nusinow comment (not directed at him but
this seems to be where the main defencive stance on this seems to be):
> X.org not only runs on fat workstations but also on embedded device
> where you as less abstraction layers and diskspace used as possible.
> Debian
Axel Beckert wrote:
I really can't understand how someone can suggest to fake packages
using equivs instead of using the "Recommends:" header as it's
thought.
The Policy says in 7.2 very clearly "in all but unusual
installations", so nobody can't use users "who just want it work" as
argument. De
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 20:24 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> I herewith vote for demoting hal (#515214) and console-setup (#523960)
> to recommends.
THIS IS NOT A FUCKING VOTE.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
4 matches
Mail list logo
