Bug#539705: can we proceed?

Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > Intel has all the paid developers in the world to look after that > particular issue with their driver. Meanwhile, the rest of X works > fine as it is. > Intel from testing doesn't work with Xserver 1.6. Brice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.

Bug#539705: can we proceed?

2009/9/12 Julien Cristau : > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 13:18:16 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:50:57 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> > >> >> Unless I'm mistaken, all the required components for this ne

Bug#539705: can we proceed?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:50:57 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > >> Unless I'm mistaken, all the required components for this new MESA and >> the new X.org to go into Testing are ready. Shall we remove this >> artificial RC bug then? >>

Bug#539705: can we proceed?

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 13:18:16 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:50:57 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > >> Unless I'm mistaken, all the required components for this new MESA and > >> the new X.org to g

Bug#539705: can we proceed?

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:50:57 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > Unless I'm mistaken, all the required components for this new MESA and > the new X.org to go into Testing are ready. Shall we remove this > artificial RC bug then? > Not unless we want to ignore xserver-xorg-video-intel bugginess

Bug#539705: can we proceed?

Unless I'm mistaken, all the required components for this new MESA and the new X.org to go into Testing are ready. Shall we remove this artificial RC bug then? Martin-Éric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-x-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@