Bug#579425: Still no dice, but a segfault instead

2010-09-28 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-05-13 02:15 +0200, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau > Version: 1:0.0.15+git20100329+7858345-3 > Severity: normal > > So I upgraded to 2.6.32-12 (after spending some time to finally understand > it's > named 2.6.32-5) as well as 2.6.33-experimentl4 (couldn't find

Bug#579425: Still no dice, but a segfault instead

2010-05-13 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-05-13 15:14 +0200, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> So I upgraded to 2.6.32-12 (after spending some time to finally understand >>> it's >>> named 2.6.32-5) as well as 2.6.33-experimentl4 (couldn't find the >>> experimental5 >>> you mention), and booted without the vga= argument. >>> The result

Bug#579425: Still no dice, but a segfault instead

2010-05-13 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> So I upgraded to 2.6.32-12 (after spending some time to finally understand >> it's >> named 2.6.32-5) as well as 2.6.33-experimentl4 (couldn't find the >> experimental5 >> you mention), and booted without the vga= argument. >> The result is a segfault apparently related to libdrm-nouveau, so I

Bug#579425: Still no dice, but a segfault instead

2010-05-12 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2010-05-13 02:15 +0200, Stefan Monnier wrote: > So I upgraded to 2.6.32-12 (after spending some time to finally understand > it's > named 2.6.32-5) as well as 2.6.33-experimentl4 (couldn't find the > experimental5 > you mention), and booted without the vga= argument. > The result is a segfaul

Bug#579425: Still no dice, but a segfault instead

2010-05-12 Thread Stefan Monnier
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau Version: 1:0.0.15+git20100329+7858345-3 Severity: normal So I upgraded to 2.6.32-12 (after spending some time to finally understand it's named 2.6.32-5) as well as 2.6.33-experimentl4 (couldn't find the experimental5 you mention), and booted without the vga= arg