Hi, Julien.
2011/9/25 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 23:40:42 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
Hi, Kibi.
On Feb 23 2011, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (28/09/2010):
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 06:24:40 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (28/09/2010):
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 06:24:40 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
What happens with the Debian kernel currently in unstable?
It has 8xx blacklisted from kms, so won't work with that driver.
2.6.32-24 (to be uploaded today) should work though.
Hi, Kibi.
On Feb 23 2011, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (28/09/2010):
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 06:24:40 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
What happens with the Debian kernel currently in unstable?
It has 8xx blacklisted from kms, so won't work with that driver.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 00:30:07 +0400, Dmitry Semyonov wrote:
Cyril,
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 18:29, you wrote:
You may want to try a newer version
It had some changes related to shadow, not sure what their impact is.
Indeed the performance degradation is fixed in 2.13 version. And
Hello Julien,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 13:01, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 00:30:07 +0400, Dmitry Semyonov wrote:
Condensed noteworthy differences between old and new Xorg.0.log:
(==) intel(0): Shadow buffer enabled, GPU acceleration disabled.
(II) intel(0): direct
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:07:03 +0400, Dmitry Semyonov wrote:
Hello Julien,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 13:01, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 00:30:07 +0400, Dmitry Semyonov wrote:
Condensed noteworthy differences between old and new Xorg.0.log:
(==) intel(0): Shadow
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:18, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:07:03 +0400, Dmitry Semyonov wrote:
(Note however that
'man intel' suggests shadow option is disabled by default.)
We're turning it on for i8xx in the debian package to avoid hangs. I
should fix the manpage to
Hi Dmitry,
Dmitry Semyonov linu...@gmail.com (20/10/2010):
After today's testing upgrade of xserver-xorg-video-intel (2:2.9.1-4
- 2:2.12.0+shadow-2) 2D performance dropped to hardly usable state.
Page scrolling in Iceweasel and windows movements became very
sluggish. Any ideas how to work
Hello Cyril,
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 15:37, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Dmitry Semyonov linu...@gmail.com (20/10/2010):
After today's testing upgrade of xserver-xorg-video-intel (2:2.9.1-4
- 2:2.12.0+shadow-2) 2D performance dropped to hardly usable state.
which kernel are you
Dmitry Semyonov linu...@gmail.com (20/10/2010):
The one that comes with Squeeze:
linux-image-2.6.32-5-686 (Version: 2.6.32-25)
OK, just checking.
Attached.
Thanks, will look into that later. You may want to try a newer version
of the driver, which you'll find here:
Cyril,
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 18:29, you wrote:
You may want to try a newer version
It had some changes related to shadow, not sure what their impact is.
Indeed the performance degradation is fixed in 2.13 version. And
although it is still not perfect (e.g. smooth scrolling of Gmail
threads
Dmitry Semyonov linu...@gmail.com (21/10/2010):
Indeed the performance degradation is fixed in 2.13 version. And
although it is still not perfect (e.g. smooth scrolling of Gmail
threads takes nearly 100% CPU, which IIRC was the same with a bunch
of last releases), at least the driver is usable
Hi!
After today's testing upgrade of xserver-xorg-video-intel (2:2.9.1-4
- 2:2.12.0+shadow-2) 2D performance dropped to hardly usable state.
Page scrolling in Iceweasel and windows movements became very
sluggish. Any ideas how to work this around?
lspci reports Intel Corporation 82865G
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 06:24:40 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
What happens with the Debian kernel currently in unstable?
It has 8xx blacklisted from kms, so won't work with that driver.
2.6.32-24 (to be uploaded today) should work though.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital
notfound 597993 2:2.12.0+shadow-2~noshadow0
found597993 2:2.12.0+shadow-1
thanks
Hi,
Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br (24/09/2010):
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.12.0+shadow-2~noshadow0
please report bugs against versions we actually have in the archive.
After having
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfound 597993 2:2.12.0+shadow-2~noshadow0
Bug #597993 [xserver-xorg-video-intel] xserver-xorg-video-intel: [865GM]
shadowfb makes moving windows way too slow
There is no source info for the package 'xserver-xorg-video-intel' at version
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.12.0+shadow-2~noshadow0
Severity: normal
Hi there.
After having upgraded to 2.12.0+shadow-1, I noticed that the shadow
framebuffer makes moving windows very slow (sometimes, up to 1 minute
for moving a single window).
I use an own compiled kernel
17 matches
Mail list logo
