Cyril Brulebois (02/06/2011):
> Looking into it, you only put there some drivers (no intel, btw?).
> Shouldn't we more or less have the same contents for armhf as for
> armel? Sorry for the oversimplification, but I thought it was just a
> port with better optimizations (and consequently a differe
Hi Konstantinos,
Konstantinos Margaritis (11/04/2011):
> Hi, any news about this bug report? Looking at it a second time and
> after the recent discussion in debian-arm [1], instead of -nv,
> -nouveau should be used -for those rare cases, an arm board with
> pci-e/agp is found and the user wants
Hi, any news about this bug report?
Looking at it a second time and after the recent discussion in
debian-arm [1], instead of -nv,
-nouveau should be used -for those rare cases, an arm board with
pci-e/agp is found and the
user wants to try an nvidia card. I can send a new patch if you'd
like, but
Source: xorg
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
The armhf port has reached a very good state (at 87%) at debian-ports.org,
and I'm now mass-filing bug reports to packages for armhf support.
Most packages just have to add armhf in the architecture field. The complete
list is in http://wiki.debian.
4 matches
Mail list logo
