Le 21/05/2012 21:17, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
It looks to me like a separate build is better as far as d-i is concerned.
Ok, the question is rather "can we add 45k worth of udeb to make working
on GTK3 easier in Debian" (i.e reduce the build time a lot by building
it only once), the extra ram
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 21:21:47 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 21/05/2012 21:17, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> >That means more udebs, more stuff in the d-i image/initramfs. I'm not
> >sure it's worth the trouble. Quite the contrary, in fact.
> >
> >It looks to me like a separate build is bet
Le 21/05/2012 21:17, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
That means more udebs, more stuff in the d-i image/initramfs. I'm not
sure it's worth the trouble. Quite the contrary, in fact.
It looks to me like a separate build is better as far as d-i is concerned.
How "costy" would those udeb be? Those are s
Sebastien Bacher (21/05/2012):
> Currently gtk is doing a second build pass with different configure
> option for its udeb flavor because libxrandr, libxcomposite and
> libxdamage don't have udebs. It would be nice if you could add an udeb
> to libxrandr so we could bring gtk into a single pass bu
4 matches
Mail list logo
