Hey,
Op 30-05-12 00:30, Yann Dirson schreef:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:45:45PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Even then, why this Depends of ati on all 3 drivers ? I can dpkg -r
--force-depends both mach64 and r128, and ati+radeon does startup
without complaining at all. Shouldn't this be
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 08:33:47AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
The current situation just makes some people (eg. me ;) break the
dependency link that's the weakest to get rid of useless drivers, with
the results described in my original report.
What are you gaining?
$ for f in $(dpkg
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 23:32:58 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:
The current situation just makes some people (eg. me ;) break the
dependency link that's the weakest to get rid of useless drivers, with
the results described in my original report.
That's good, then we can point and laugh.
Cheers,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:02:14AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
The dependency in squeeze (and in other suites) is:
ati→{mach64,r128,radeon}
there's no:
radeon→ati
OK, my bad - surely some confusion on my side.
But the result is, GLX is entirely disabled, and we can see a fail to
Yann Dirson ydir...@free.fr (29/05/2012):
OK I understand that there is no absolute requirement for -ati, and
thus a Depends is probably not a good idea for some users. But for
the vast majority, who will want to use it, what about adding a note
in package descriptions of {mach64,r128,radeon}
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:45:45PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Even then, why this Depends of ati on all 3 drivers ? I can dpkg -r
--force-depends both mach64 and r128, and ati+radeon does startup
without complaining at all. Shouldn't this be downgraded to a
Recommends as well ?
6 matches
Mail list logo
