Re: Re: Re: Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?

2015-04-30 Thread Luca Boccassi
On 30 April 2015 at 16:53, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 20:55:29 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > >> There's also the problem that as soon as a new kernel release is >> uploaded to Sid, a few nasty bugs which are fixed on 2.99.x are going to >> appear, at least for Haswell users. >

Re: Re: Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?

2015-04-30 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 20:55:29 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > There's also the problem that as soon as a new kernel release is > uploaded to Sid, a few nasty bugs which are fixed on 2.99.x are going to > appear, at least for Haswell users. > Sounds to me like a bug that ought to get fixed in the

Re: Re: Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?

2015-04-29 Thread Luca Boccassi
On 28/04/15 15:28, Vincent Cheng wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: >> On 28/04/15 12:02, Vincent Cheng wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Now that jessie is out and the freeze is over, would anyone object if >>> I were to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel from experiment

Re: Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?

2015-04-28 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 28/04/15 12:02, Vincent Cheng wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Now that jessie is out and the freeze is over, would anyone object if >> I were to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel from experimental to sid >> now? 3.0 is supposed to be an "immine

Re: Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?

2015-04-28 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 15:28:51 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:02:37AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Now that jessie is out and the freeze is over, would anyone object if > > I were to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel from experimental to sid > > now? 3

Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?

2015-04-28 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:50:02PM +0200, Søren Holm wrote: > Probably, but why keep it in experimental just because the number scheme is a > little bit off. see previous discussions on this mailinglist. once there is a proper release I'm all for it. Ask intel why they don't!? -- maks -- To

Re: Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?

2015-04-28 Thread Søren Holm
Probably, but why keep it in experimental just because the number scheme is a little bit off. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?

2015-04-28 Thread maximilian attems
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 03:02:37AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Hi, > > Now that jessie is out and the freeze is over, would anyone object if > I were to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel from experimental to sid > now? 3.0 is supposed to be an "imminent release" [1] anyways. isn't this imminent s

Re: Bug#748753: Upload xxv-intel 2.99.x to sid?

2015-04-28 Thread Søren Holm
No - please do so. I've been using it from experimental since christmas with no issues. Xorg reports this : [ 4.086] (II) Module intel: vendor="X.Org Foundation" [ 4.088] (II) intel: Driver for Intel(R) Integrated Graphics Chipsets: [ 4.088] (II) intel: Driver for Intel(R) HD Graphic