Your message dated Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:14:01 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id 
<896650565.206546357.1372421641849.javamail.r...@zimbra13-e2.priv.proxad.net>
and subject line xbase-clients: [xhost] manpage implies that you can 'xhost 
+user@hostname'
has caused the Debian Bug report #79381,
regarding xbase-clients: [xhost] manpage implies that you can 'xhost 
+user@hostname'
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
79381: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=79381
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xbase-clients
Version: 4.0.1-11

The man page of xhost states in the OPTIONS section that
"[+]name     The given name (the plus sign is optional) is added to the
list allowed to connect to the X server. The name can be a host name or a
user name."
which simply doesn't work in Linux, right?


Oh, btw, this is interesting too:

$ xhost +user@localhost
user@localhost being added to access control list
X Error of failed request:  BadValue (integer parameter out of range for
operation)
  Major opcode of failed request:  109 (X_ChangeHosts)
  Value in failed request:  0xfe
  Serial number of failed request:  8
  Current serial number in output stream:  10


I'm using Debian woody(unstable), Linux 2.2.17, libc6 2.2-5 and X 4.0.1-11

Cheers,
Martin

============================================================
                       Martin Sjögren
   md...@mdstud.chalmers.se       ICQ : 41245059
   Phone: +46 (0)31 405242        Cell: +46 (0)739 169191
============================================================
 vi is [[13~^[[15~^[[15~^[[19~^[[18~^ a
 muk[^[[29~^[[34~^[[26~^[[32~^ch better editor than this
 emacs. I know I^[[14~'ll get flamed for this but the truth
 has to be said. ^[[D^[[D^[[D^[[D ^[[D^[^[[D^[[D^[[B^
 exit ^X^C quit :x :wq dang it :w:w:w :x ^C^C^Z^D
-- Jesper Lauridsen <rorsc...@daimi.aau.dk>
============================================================



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This bug is fixed for a long time.

-- 
Stéphane Aulery

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to