Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Die, 2002-12-31 at 10:31, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most
definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a
while.
It is, I assume.
Assumptions tend to be flawed. :)
On Don, 2003-01-02 at 01:54, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
There were no significant changes in the code either, as I saw in my
comparison. (Mesa is of the same version, too.)
I guess it's still possible that the interface between the common client
side DRI code and
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Die, 2002-12-31 at 10:31, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most
definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a
while.
It is, I assume.
Assumptions tend to be flawed.
On Don, 2003-01-02 at 01:54, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
There were no significant changes in the code either, as I saw in my
comparison. (Mesa is of the same version, too.)
I guess it's still possible that the interface between the common client
side DRI code and
Michel Dänzer wrote:
Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most
definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a
while.
It is, I assume. Otherwise how should one explain why just exchanging
sis_dri.so makes it work? The logical consequence can only be
On Die, 2002-12-31 at 10:31, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most
definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a
while.
It is, I assume.
Assumptions tend to be flawed. :) Have there been
On Die, 2002-12-31 at 10:31, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
Is SiS DRI even supposed to work in 4.2.x? I know that it most
definitely won't work in 4.3.0 because it hasn't been maintained in a
while.
It is, I assume.
Assumptions tend to be flawed. :) Have there been
I finally updated to 4.2.1 (-4) from 4.1.0.1 and found that DRI on the
SiS chipsets does not work anymore.
My box is running kernel 2.4.19 (with xfs patch, otherwise vanilla) and
the latest XFree 4.2.1-4 packages from unstable.
The (XFree) SiS driver enables DRI correctly, but glxgears says
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 16:13, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
I finally updated to 4.2.1 (-4) from 4.1.0.1 and found that DRI on the
SiS chipsets does not work anymore.
My box is running kernel 2.4.19 (with xfs patch, otherwise vanilla) and
the latest XFree 4.2.1-4 packages from unstable.
The
I finally updated to 4.2.1 (-4) from 4.1.0.1 and found that DRI on the
SiS chipsets does not work anymore.
My box is running kernel 2.4.19 (with xfs patch, otherwise vanilla) and
the latest XFree 4.2.1-4 packages from unstable.
The (XFree) SiS driver enables DRI correctly, but glxgears
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 16:13, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
I finally updated to 4.2.1 (-4) from 4.1.0.1 and found that DRI on the
SiS chipsets does not work anymore.
My box is running kernel 2.4.19 (with xfs patch, otherwise vanilla) and
the latest XFree 4.2.1-4 packages from unstable.
The
11 matches
Mail list logo
