Your message dated Fri, 23 Apr 2004 12:53:36 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#218614: Branden, please apply attached patch (Was Re:
Driver SDK.)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 10:59:51PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Shouldn't we start with the minimum required to build drivers, and add
> more as the need arises?
And you will provide the patch for it ?
Friendly,
Sven Luther
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 03:19:15AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> Eh? I mean a single package for all drivers (of which the admin can
> choose between last-released, current-cvs, ... flavours), in case that
> wasn't clear.
I don't really see that this buys us much advantage over the status quo.
--
[ I followed up to the OpenGL related problem to bug #218823 ]
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 18:42, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:22:28PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 07:40, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:59:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrot
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:22:28PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 07:40, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:59:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:35:53AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 06:01:22PM -0500,
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 07:40, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:59:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:35:53AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 06:01:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> > I like to test my packages before uploa
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:59:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:35:53AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 06:01:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Why should the DDK be restricted to only some architectures?
> >
> > Because the SDK is 170Mo
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 02:53, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 11:37:51PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 13:14, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > [...] proper driver packages, which should install and divert the
> > > xfree86 provided packages, a bit like Michel
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:29:06AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 01:07:14PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Keep in mind, though, that the SDK/DDK package is a post-4.3.0-1 issue.
>
> Ok too, as long as it can be released with sarge.
You should know better than to try to
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 09:35:53AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 06:01:22PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Why should the DDK be restricted to only some architectures?
>
> Because the SDK is 170Mo big, and the resulting tarball is 50Mo big, and
> since it is bzip2ed, it w
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 12:04:46PM +, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> For the sake of perhaps shortening the discussion I will insert a
> description, as I understand it.
>
> * prescriptive
> a variable you set manually before starting to build to change the way
> the build runs. A nice example i
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 11:37:51PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 13:14, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > [...] proper driver packages, which should install and divert the
> > xfree86 provided packages, a bit like Michel's DRI trunk package do.
>
> I think breaking out the drivers
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 04:23:10PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
>> > On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 05:11:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
>> > No, I don't have a DONT_BUILD_SERVER option.
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 11:37:51PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 13:14, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > [...] proper driver packages, which should install and divert the
> > xfree86 provided packages, a bit like Michel's DRI trunk package do.
>
> I think breaking out the drivers
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 01:07:14PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 12:55:02PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 04:51:59AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > I guess you decided to ignore my reply to you on debian-x. :(
> >
> > Huh ? Didn't see any r
-- and it looks like it might be.
> >
> > Upstream calls it SDK though, so it would be nice to have it in the
> > descritption so it shows up in apt-cache search or something.
>
> Good idea.
>
> > > Maybe the package should simply be called "xfree86-
is what i think a final version of the driver sdk.
> >
> > If it doesn't apply cleanly, it's your ass. :-P
>
> If it doesn't apply cleanly, i send a new one.
You'd better. :)
> > No, I don't have a DONT_BUILD_SERVER option. As I've explained
On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 13:14, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> [...] proper driver packages, which should install and divert the
> xfree86 provided packages, a bit like Michel's DRI trunk package do.
I think breaking out the drivers into their own package
(xserver-xfree86-drivers or something?) would be cle
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 12:55:02PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 04:51:59AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I guess you decided to ignore my reply to you on debian-x. :(
>
> Huh ? Didn't see any reply on debian-x, at least not prior to writting
> this mail, and i _do_ rea
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 04:51:59AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 05:11:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok, here attached is what i think a final version of the driver sdk. The
> > only remaining thing is to attach some documentation in the
> > RE
Ok, i have seen this mail now, but it didn't arrive before i send the
other one.
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 04:23:10PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 05:11:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok, here attached is what i think a final version of the driver s
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 05:11:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Ok, here attached is what i think a final version of the driver sdk. The
> only remaining thing is to attach some documentation in the
> README.Debian file, but i will first need to actually use the package to
> build
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 05:11:26PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Ok, here attached is what i think a final version of the driver sdk.
If it doesn't apply cleanly, it's your ass. :-P
> The only remaining thing is to attach some documentation in the
> README.Debian file, but i
Package: xfree86
Version: 4.3.0-0pre1v4
Severity: wishlist
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 04:14:15PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I attach here a draft of the smallish patch to enable the building of
> the driver SDK. The patch only patches the debian directory, and no
> up
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 04:14:15PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I attach here a draft of the smallish patch to enable the building of
> the driver SDK. The patch only patches the debian directory, and no
> upstream patch is needed anymore, since the 000_post430.diff
Hello,
I attach here a draft of the smallish patch to enable the building of
the driver SDK. The patch only patches the debian directory, and no
upstream patch is needed anymore, since the 000_post430.diff patch
already includes them.
For the rest, i have created a xfree86-driver-sdk package
26 matches
Mail list logo
