I have been told that -march=k6 may not be beneficial for athlons. But
some compilers may be able to use -march=k7. See previous emails on this
subject. Thanks.
--
** Derek J Witt**
* Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:26:14PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all. I finally succeeded in compiling K6-optimized X binaries for
XF4.0.1.
Are these optimizations also benificial for the K7 (Athlon) line of
CPU's?
attachment: Navidad.exe
I have been told that -march=k6 may not be beneficial for athlons. But
some compilers may be able to use -march=k7. See previous emails on this
subject. Thanks.
--
** Derek J Witt**
* Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
PROTECTED]
Subject: K6-x optimized .debs for 4.0.1-1
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:26:14 -0600 (CST)
Hi, all. I finally succeeded in compiling K6-optimized X binaries for
XF4.0.1. So far, it's quite stable... I'm still having troubles with my
s3virge server hard-locking my box me when running moire2
sure. not a problem. I don't reboot my box very often (or don't plan to).
Don't be surprised if it slows down a bit during that time. this is my
personal box. :-) I won't be recompiling X on this box very often. But,
i'll mail the list when i do. thanks.
--
** Derek J Witt
PROTECTED]
Subject: K6-x optimized .debs for 4.0.1-1
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 12:26:14 -0600 (CST)
Hi, all. I finally succeeded in compiling K6-optimized X binaries for
XF4.0.1. So far, it's quite stable... I'm still having troubles with my
s3virge server hard-locking my box me when running moire2
sure. not a problem. I don't reboot my box very often (or don't plan to).
Don't be surprised if it slows down a bit during that time. this is my
personal box. :-) I won't be recompiling X on this box very often. But,
i'll mail the list when i do. thanks.
--
** Derek J Witt
Well, k6 will work just fine for athlon. Looks like k7 is either removed
or buggy.
--
** Derek J Witt**
* Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Home Page: http://www.flinthills.com/~djw/ *
***
Hi there,
what have you done to get k6 optimized binaries ? Which flags have you
used if I may ask ?
Greetings
Michael Meding
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there's a different flag for athlon, it's -march=k7 (vs. -march=k6 for
K6-x).
--
** Derek J Witt**
* Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Home Page: http://www.flinthills.com/~djw/ *
*** "Houston,
Hi there,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there's a different flag for athlon, it's -march=k7 (vs. -march=k6 for
^^^ guess that is not
going to work with gcc-2.95.2.
So what is best for athlon (classic, duron, thunderbird) then ? Took
some from
* Michael Meding [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001107 19:50]:
[..athlon..]
Anybody any ideas ?
Chances are good there will be very few ideas coming from debian-x. Try
google, usenet, gcc mailling lists, perhaps debian-user. (Sadly, the gcc
manpage didn't seem to shout the right answer to me. It did
Well, k6 will work just fine for athlon. Looks like k7 is either removed
or buggy.
--
** Derek J Witt**
* Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Home Page: http://www.flinthills.com/~djw/ *
***
Hi there,
what have you done to get k6 optimized binaries ? Which flags have you
used if I may ask ?
Greetings
Michael Meding
Sure, I just used -march=k6 -funrolled-loops -finline-functions in
hosts.def.
--
** Derek J Witt**
* Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Home Page: http://www.flinthills.com/~djw/ *
*** Houston,
there's a different flag for athlon, it's -march=k7 (vs. -march=k6 for
K6-x).
--
** Derek J Witt**
* Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Home Page: http://www.flinthills.com/~djw/ *
*** Houston,
Hi there,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there's a different flag for athlon, it's -march=k7 (vs. -march=k6 for
^^^ guess that is not
going to work with gcc-2.95.2.
So what is best for athlon (classic, duron, thunderbird) then ? Took
some from
Hi Seth,
Seth Arnold wrote:
* Michael Meding [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001107 19:50]:
[..athlon..]
Anybody any ideas ?
Chances are good there will be very few ideas coming from debian-x. Try
google, usenet, gcc mailling lists, perhaps debian-user. (Sadly, the gcc
manpage didn't seem to shout
* Michael Meding [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001107 19:50]:
[..athlon..]
Anybody any ideas ?
Chances are good there will be very few ideas coming from debian-x. Try
google, usenet, gcc mailling lists, perhaps debian-user. (Sadly, the gcc
manpage didn't seem to shout the right answer to me. It did mention
Hi, all. I finally succeeded in compiling K6-optimized X binaries for
XF4.0.1. So far, it's quite stable... I'm still having troubles with my
s3virge server hard-locking my box me when running moire2
screensaver...cheap card perhaps? If people would like to try these out, I
put the .debs up on
BTW, the patched xserver-xfree86 s3virge support will only work for the
virge/gx2 chip. If you don't have the gx2, but do have an s3 chip, I
recommend not getting my binaries,but instead just not getting the
s3virge/gx2 patch.
Cheers.
--
** Derek J Witt
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:26:14PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all. I finally succeeded in compiling K6-optimized X binaries for
XF4.0.1.
Are these optimizations also benificial for the K7 (Athlon) line of
CPU's?
PGP signature
Hi, all. I finally succeeded in compiling K6-optimized X binaries for
XF4.0.1. So far, it's quite stable... I'm still having troubles with my
s3virge server hard-locking my box me when running moire2
screensaver...cheap card perhaps? If people would like to try these out, I
put the .debs up on
BTW, the patched xserver-xfree86 s3virge support will only work for the
virge/gx2 chip. If you don't have the gx2, but do have an s3 chip, I
recommend not getting my binaries,but instead just not getting the
s3virge/gx2 patch.
Cheers.
--
** Derek J Witt
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:26:14PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all. I finally succeeded in compiling K6-optimized X binaries for
XF4.0.1.
Are these optimizations also benificial for the K7 (Athlon) line of
CPU's?
pgpK2Ow4AXj7y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
25 matches
Mail list logo
